NSAIDS Versus Opioids in Acute SER II Ankle Fractures

July 11, 2017 updated by: University of California, Davis

Pain Management With NSAIDS in Acute Ankle Fractures Type Supination, External Rotation (SER) II: A Prospective Randomized, Single Blinded Controlled Study

This study is being conducted to evaluate whether NSAIDS are more or less effective in bone healing than opioids in acute fracture pain. Participants will be randomized to one of three groups for first line treatment of pain related to the fracture.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Pain management in acute fractures is challenging and influenced by several factors contributing to pain perception. These factors include but are not limited to tissue damage by the local impact, mechanical stress at the fracture ends, and central perception of the noxious stimulus. Tissue damage and mechanical stress leads to inflammation and further to local swelling. Swelling itself is significant contributor in pain development.

Ideal pain management would attack pain development at most sites possible. The current clinical practice in the US applies a derivate of an opioid analgesic combined with acetaminophen, thereby influencing pain development at central perception by the opioid analgesic and acetaminophen and a peripheral analgesic effect of acetaminophen. The exact mechanism of the peripheral effect is not known.

This clinical practice disregards the positive effect of medications influencing the peripheral inflammatory response, namely nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). NSAIDs affect pain development by blocking the synthesis of arachidonic acid metabolites, inhibiting peripheral inflammatory response and central pain perception. The major reason for not applying NSAIDs in the treatment of acute fracture pain is an experimental animal study showing decreased bone healing in relation to NSAID usage.

However, clinical data thus far is inconclusive, whether bone healing is affected in humans and whether NSAIDs should be avoided in the setting of bone fractures.

This proposed study will give an answer whether the usage of NSAIDs in acute fractures has a negative effect on bone healing.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • University of California Davis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 to < 60
  • Isolated ankle fracture type SER II
  • Ability to speak and understand English
  • BMI< 35

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA>3
  • Previous or acute gastric bleeding
  • Renal insufficiency (Creatinine: >1.27mg/dl)
  • Liver insufficiency (Child-Pugh-Wert: 10-15)
  • Malignant tumor
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Heart failure (NYHA III-IV)
  • High frequency absolute arrhythmia
  • Patients with known psychiatric illness
  • Coagulopathy
  • Asthma
  • Function limiting disease of the lower extremity, besides what is mentioned in the inclusion criteria
  • Adults unable to consent
  • Pregnant women
  • Prisoners
  • Workers Comp patient
  • Early fracture displacement (within first 2 weeks) indicating need for surgery
  • Polytrauma
  • Concurrent participation in another clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ibuprofen 400 mg
Ibuprofen 400 mg po q 8 hours as needed (PRN) for pain. Subjects will receive Norco, 5/525 mg po q 6 hours PRN if pain relief with Ibuprofen is not sufficient.
Ibuprofen 400 mg and 800 mg
Other Names:
  • Motrin
Active Comparator: Ibuprofen 800 mg
Ibuprofen 800 mg po q 8 hours PRN pain. Subjects will receive Norco, 5/525 mg po q 6 hours PRN if pain relief with Ibuprofen is not sufficient.
Ibuprofen 400 mg and 800 mg
Other Names:
  • Motrin
Active Comparator: Norco
Norco (acetaminophen/hydrocodone) 10/325 mg po q 6 hours PRN pain. If pain is not relieved, physician should be contacted.
Norco 5/325 mg and 10/325 mg
Other Names:
  • Norco

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
fracture healing as measured by radiographic evaluation
Time Frame: 12 weeks
fracture healing at 12 weeks followup
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain level improvement as measured by VAS score
Time Frame: 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks and 12 weeks
VAS score
1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks and 12 weeks
functional improvement as measured by AAOS score
Time Frame: 1 weeks, 2 weeks 6 weeks, 9 weeks and 12 weeks
AAOS scale
1 weeks, 2 weeks 6 weeks, 9 weeks and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert J Steffner, MD, University of California, Davis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 26, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Fracture

Clinical Trials on Ibuprofen

3
Subscribe