Comparing the Hemodiafiltration On-line and Conventional Hemodialysis in Terms of Cost-benefit (PHARMACO-$)

Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Hemodiafiltration On-line and Conventional Hemodialysis in Terms of Cost-benefit

The site where the clinical trial will be conducted is at the St-Luc hospital from the CHUM. This is a prospective randomized study that will compare the two treatment modalities, HD and HDF, through economics and pharmaco-economics parameters.

Patients, who had previously been randomized in the CONTRAST study, will remain in their respective group and monitoring will continue. The next patients will be randomized in the same way (1: 1) using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. HDF randomized patients will receive post-dilution standard reinjection (at least 100ml/min or 6 liter/hr). In rare cases, HDF patients can briefly have reinjection on a pre-dilution mode (if heparin need to be avoided for example) and the reinjection flow should be adjusted accordingly (200ml/min).

Length and frequency of sessions will be the same in the 2 groups. Blood tests will not change and will be the same than those used as routine assessments. Metabolic control of patients will be maintained according to the guidelines. Patients will be monitored for a minimum of 3 years. A set of demographic and clinical data will be collected from patient medical records and throughout the study.

Biochemical data as part of the usual blood tests of dialysis patients will be collected each month as well as will be stored and analyzed information about the annual cardiac ultrasounds.

All events will be scored (hospitalizations, patterns, duration) and the list and cost of drugs will be compiled every three months. These data will be useful in the economic analysis comparing the two treatment modalities.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 3J4
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • more than 18 years old,
  • able to consent,
  • patient needs to be on hemodialysis more than 8-12 hours a week (2-3 sessions)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe none compliance (often missing sessions without good reasons),
  • life expectation less than 3 months,
  • treated with high-flux filters in the last 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: conventional hemodialysis
Active Comparator: hemodiafiltration On-line

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
compare the medication cost between the 2 groups (HD and HDF)
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
demonstrate lower cost of erythropoietin in HDF, with same control of anemia to HD group
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
demonstrate lower cost of phosphate binder in HDF, with same control of phospho calcium balance to HD group
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
demonstrate lower need of Erythropoietin and best control of anemia in HDF
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
demonstrate lower need of phosphate binder and best control of phospho-calcique balance in HDF
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
demonstrate less hospitalization stay and cost related in HDF group
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
stabilisation or regression of left ventricular hypertrophy
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemodialysis

Clinical Trials on conventional hemodialysis

Subscribe