Pneumatic Reversible Portal Vein Diameter Modulation After Major Hepatectomy (MODHEP1)

April 15, 2019 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Pneumatic Reversible Portal Vein Diameter Modulation After Major Hepatectomy in Non Cirrhotic Patient

This ring aimed to preserve an intra-hepatic porto-caval gradient inferior to 5 mm Hg during and after major hepatectomy (48h) to protect the liver during the initial phases of liver regeneration. Morphological features of MID-AVRTM allow its intra corporeal opening and percutaneously removal after an balloon inflation with 5 ml of physiological serum. MID-AVRTM had been developed in pig where it had proved its efficiency to improve liver function after 75% hepatectomy and its capacity to be removed percutaneously. Aim of this feasibility study (Phase I/II) is to prove in series of 3 evaluable patients (Phase A) then 6 evaluable patients (Phase B) that MID-AVRTM could be used in human without deleterious consequence. In phase A, MID-AVRTM is dispose around the portal vein before and during a major hepatectomy performed on healthy liver and removed before abdominal closure. If phase A results confirmed that MID-AVRTM well modulates portal pressure and is easily opened and removed by acute inflation, the phase B will be started. In phase B, MID-AVRTM will be dispose around the portal vein before major hepatectomy on healthy liver and conserved 48 hours before to be removed percutaneously at the operating room.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Preserving liver function is vital, especially after hepatectomy, the main curative treatment of liver tumor. An hepatectomy that preserved a remnant liver volume < 0.5% of the body weight is associated with a very high risk of post-operative liver failure. In such situation, liver volume is not sufficient to support local hemodynamic consequences of the hepatectomy that is responsible of intrahepatic endothelial cell injury that impaired liver function and regeneration. To date, preoperative vein embolization (PVE) associated or not to liver transection (ALPSS procedure) that increased future remnant liver from 20% to 90% is the only method to prevent this complication. Even this preparation is necessary for the moment, PVE increased cancer cell proliferation and is associated with lower recurrence free survival than without PVE. Despite a potential PVE, POLF occurred in 5% to 7% after major hepatectomy and stayed the first cause of death after hepatectomy. It has been demonstrated that portal pressure superior to 20 mm Hg and/or porto-caval gradient superior to 12 mm Hg at the end of hepatectomy was associated to the occurrence of POLF. Aim to avoid this acute intra hepatic portal hypertension associated to major hepatectomy that is associated with an early liver endothelial cell injury, we had developed an silicon ring to dispose around the portal vein that contained an circular inflatable balloon to narrow precisely the portal vein lumen (MID-AVRTM).

Phase A: Tolerance and functionality of MID-AVR during surgery Each procedure will be filmed. Phase B: Tolerance and functionality of MID-AVR after surgery Each procedure will be filmed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

12

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Villejuif, France, 94
        • Recruiting
        • AP-HP, Paul Brousse Hospital, Centre Hepato-Biliaire
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eric VIBERT, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • French resident affiliated to Social Insurance
  • Major hepatectomy (Phase A)
  • Major hepatectomy that preserved only one hepatic vein (Phase B)
  • Remnant liver volume > 0.5% of the body weight

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 80 (Phase A) and Age > 70 (Phase B)
  • Cirrhotic patient (F4)
  • Repeat hepatectomy
  • Patient who required a portal vein resection
  • History of deep venous thrombosis
  • History of portal thrombosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MID-AVR
Tolerance and functionality of MID-AVR during surgery (Phase A) and after surgery (Phase B)

Phase A (4 patients): After laparotomy and dissection of hepatic pedicle, feasibility of MID-AVR positioning around the portal vein by hepato-biliary surgeon and visual evaluation of potential spatial conflict with hepatic artery and choledochal. Mid-AVR is removed at the end of surgery. Each procedure will be filmed.

Phase B (12 patients): Mid-AVR is maintained at the end of surgery, and during 48 hours to evaluate the persistence of an hepatopetal portal flow without portal vein thrombosis upstream MID-AVR during the 48 hours after the liver surgery at bi-daily ultrasonography.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success of MID-AVR positioning
Time Frame: intraoperative
Phase A: Feasibility of MID-AVR positioning around the portal vein by hepato-biliary surgeon and visual evaluation of potential spatial conflict with hepatic artery and choledochal. Each procedure will be filmed.
intraoperative
Persistence of an hepatopetal portal flow at bi-daily ultrasonography
Time Frame: during the 48 hours after the liver surgery
Phase B: Persistence of an hepatopetal portal flow without portal vein thrombosis upstream MID-AVR
during the 48 hours after the liver surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Portal pressure measured upstream and downstream the MID-AVR
Time Frame: intraoperative
Phase A
intraoperative
Portal flow measured downstream the MID-AVR
Time Frame: intraoperative
Phase A
intraoperative
Liver perfusion assessed by intraoperative contrast enhanced ultrasonography
Time Frame: intraoperative
Phase A
intraoperative
Reliability of MID-AVR opening by balloon inflation and removal from the portal vein by smooth traction on the tube that is connected to MID-AVR.
Time Frame: intraoperative
Phase A Each procedure will be filmed.
intraoperative
Occurrence of POLF (Bilirubin > 50 µmol/L and PT < 50% )
Time Frame: at postoperative day 3
Phase B
at postoperative day 3
Occurrence of post-operative hemorrhage (decrease in haemoglobin that required red pack cell transfusion)
Time Frame: at postoperative day 3
Phase B
at postoperative day 3
Occurrence of Post-operative biliary fistulae (Bilirubin concentration in fluid drainage greater than 3 fold the plasmatic bilirubin rate)
Time Frame: at postoperative day 3
Phase B
at postoperative day 3
Reliability of MID-AVR opening by balloon inflation and percutaneously removal from the portal vein by smooth traction on the tube that is connected to MID-AVR.
Time Frame: at postoperative day 3
Phase B Removal will be done at the operating room under neurolept analgesia and local anesthesia under radiological control. Each procedure will be filmed.
at postoperative day 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric VIBERT, MD, PhD, AP-HP, Paul Brousse Hospital, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 18, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 17, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Failure

Clinical Trials on MID-AVR

3
Subscribe