Efficacy of Radium 223 in Radioactive Iodine Refractory Bone Metastases From Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (RAD-THYR)

Single Arm Phase II Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Radium 223 in Radioactive Iodine Refractory Bone Metastases From Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

The purpose of this Phase II single-arm study is to evaluate the efficacy of Radium-223 in treating bone lesions from differentiated thyroid cancer that are I-131 refractory. Based on the results of the phase III trial, the protocol using an injection of Radium-223 activity of 50 kBq/kg b.w. given 6 times at 4 weeks interval will be applied. The end point of this study will be the evaluation of Radium-223 efficacy one month after 3 administrations, i.e. at 3 months after the first injection. If disease progression at that time is excluded, patients will be treated with 3 further injections for a total of 6 administrations of Radium-223. The principal response criterion at 3 and 6 months will be the metabolic response on FDG PET/CT, but other imaging techniques will also be performed: axial skeleton MRI, 99mTc-HMDP bone scan and FNa PET/CT. Axial skeleton MRI is the reference for soft tissue study. 99mTc- HMDP bone scan is the most used and available routine tool to detect bone metastases in cancer patients, but its sensitivity in patients with bone metastases from thyroid cancer is low, because most lesions are lytic [23]. 18FNa PET/CT shows higher sensitivity than 99mTc-HMDP bone scan to detect bone lesions in cancer patients and is able to detect micrometastases that are not seen on bone scan [24] [25]. Preliminary results show some interest of using this tracer to evaluate the sclerotic component of bone metastases from thyroid cancer [26]. Furthermore preliminary data show that FNa PET/CT can be useful to quantify response to Radium-223 in prostate cancer. In only five patients evaluated by FNa PET/CT at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks after 100 KBq/Kg of Radium-223, semiquantitative analysis by SUV max showed a relationship between PSA and SUV max level decrease in 3 patients (-44%, -31%, -27% vs -52%, -75, and -49% respectively) [27].

Finally bone metastases that are visible on morphological imaging (CT scan or on RI) are frequently submitted to local treatment modalities, and this may induce fibrosis and recalcification. Therefore, already treated metastases and not treated metastases will be studied separately as two separate subgroups of target lesions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Val De Marne
      • Villejuif, Val De Marne, France, 94805
        • Gustave Roussy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Affiliated to a social security regimen ;
  2. Patients with histologically confirmed differentiated thyroid cancer (papillary, follicular including Hurthle cell or poorly differentiated) ;
  3. Iodine refractory disease defined by the absence of radioiodine uptake in at least one lesion or progression of the disease within 14 months after a radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment or persistent disease after the administration of a cumulative activity of 22GBq I 131 ;
  4. Age ≥18 years ;
  5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 ;
  6. Life expectancy longer than 3 months ;
  7. Presence of at least one bone metastasis visible on CT scan or axial skeleton (AS) MRI and not requiring urgent locoregional treatment ;
  8. Presence of at least one bone metastasis with uptake on FDG PET/CT ;
  9. Presence of at least one bone metastasis with increased uptake on 99mTc HMDP bone scintigraphy or FNa PET/CT
  10. Low likelihood of an indication for systemic treatment within the next 6 months, as defined by the absence of soft tissue distant metastases or by the presence of only small (<1cm) soft-tissue metastases, or larger (>1 cm) but stable soft tissue metastases within 6 months prior to inclusion in the present protocol ;
  11. Adequate haematological (neutrophils ≥1,5×109/L; platelets ≥100×109/ L; haemoglobin > 9g/dL), renal (creatinine <1,5×upper limit of normal range), and hepatic (total bilirubin < 1.5 institutional upper limit of normal), aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase <2,5×upper limit of normal range in the absence of liver metastases or <5×upper limit of normal range in case of liver metastases) functions ;
  12. Patients receiving bisphosphonates or anti-RANK ligand (Denosumab) are allowed but patients should have received at least 2 administrations prior to Radium-223 administration and these treatments will be continued during Radium-223 treatment ;
  13. Blood negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing potential within 30 days prior to treatment initiation. Both men and women (of childbearing potential) who are sexually active must use adequate contraception during and for at least 6 months post-treatment ;
  14. Patient who is fully informed, able to comply with the protocol and who signed the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with another malignancy that is not in remission for at least 2 years (except for in situ cervix uterine cancer, basocellular skin cancer) ;
  2. Treatment with any investigational drug or with a TKI within the previous 4 weeks, or planned during the treatment period ;
  3. Treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy within the previous 4 weeks, or planned during the treatment period, or failure to recover from adverse events due to cytotoxic chemotherapy administered more than 4 weeks before the study initiation ;
  4. Previous systemic therapy with radionuclides, including strontium-89, samarium-153, rhenium-186, rhenium-188 or radium-223 ;
  5. Patients with imminent or established spinal cord compression based on clinical findings and/or MRI and/or immediate need for local radiotherapy ;
  6. Patients with progressive visceral metastases according to RECIST 1.1 criteria assessed by CT scan and/or symptomatic brain metastases within 6 months prior to study initiation ;
  7. Patient already included in other clinical trial ;
  8. Pregnant or breast feeding women ;
  9. Fecal or urinary unmanageable incontinence ;
  10. Bone marrow dysplasia, uncontrolled diabetes or infection, NYHA Class III or IV cardiac disorders, fecal incontinence and symptomatic intestinal disease (such as Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Radium 223
Radium-223 (Xofigo®) will be supplied in vials as a ready-to-use solution for intravenous administration. The activity (administered radioactivity) will be 50 kBq/kg b.w., and multiple treatment activities up to 6 injections will be administered at intervals of 4 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Xofigo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Metabolic response (PERCIST criteria)
Time Frame: Assessed 1 months after 3 monthly injections of Radium 223
Metabolic response according to PERCIST criteria in up to five lesions on FDG PET/CT performed 1 month after 3 monthly injections of Radium 223
Assessed 1 months after 3 monthly injections of Radium 223

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain response (numerical rating scale)
Time Frame: Assessed every 30 days following the first Radium 223 up to 7 months
evaluated on a 0-to-10 numerical rating scale completed by the patients
Assessed every 30 days following the first Radium 223 up to 7 months
Partial pain response (improvement ≥30% and <50% pain score)
Time Frame: Assessed every 30 days following the first Radium 223 up to 7 months
Partial pain response is defined as an improvement ≥30% and <50% of the worst pain compared to score at baseline. Complete pain response is defined as an improvement ≥50% of the worst pain score compared to score at baseline
Assessed every 30 days following the first Radium 223 up to 7 months
ECOG performance status
Time Frame: Assessed every 30 days following the first Radium 223 up to 7 months
Assessed every 30 days following the first Radium 223 up to 7 months
Changes in Quality of life (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BM22 questionnaires)
Time Frame: Assessed every 30 days following the first Radium 223 up to 7 months
evaluated with the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BM22 questionnaires
Assessed every 30 days following the first Radium 223 up to 7 months
Time to occurrence of first skeletal-related events
Time Frame: Assessed every 30 days following the first Radium 223 up to 7 months
) confirmed by imaging defined as: (i) local progression with indication for local treatment such as surgery, thermoablation, cement injection, external beam radiation, or (ii) pathological fracture, spinal cord compression (iii) appearance of new bone lesions.
Assessed every 30 days following the first Radium 223 up to 7 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: Assessed every 30 days following the first Radium 223 up to 7 months
Assessed every 30 days following the first Radium 223 up to 7 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 2, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 2, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thyroid Cancer

Clinical Trials on Radium 223

3
Subscribe