- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02391818
The Effect of Taxane Chemotherapy on Balance in Breast Cancer Patients (IPMR Balance)
August 26, 2019 updated by: Catherine Horst, OSF Healthcare System
The purpose of this study is to quantify the balance impairments during and after taxane chemotherapy.
Disability due to balance impairments caused by chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) can cause falls, injury, and a decline in independence.
This results in poor treatment outcomes such as greater morbidity and mortality, inability to complete treatment protocols, self-limitation of activity, and diminished quality of life.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to describe the balance deficits prior to the initiation of taxane therapy and through the duration of treatment and compare balance to a cohort of women without taxane therapy.
To our knowledge, a study like this has not been done yet it is a necessary next step in order to evaluate whether balance deficits resolve independent of treatment or if the balance deficits require targeted therapy.
Other studies evaluating balance in taxane patients, have used cross-sectional study designs that are limited to observation at one point in time.
Further, other evaluations have been limited in the measurement of balance using only self-report questionnaires, with no performance measurements of functional balance.
Previous studies of other conditions have shown poor concordance between self-report questionnaires and performance measures.
Therefore, our proposed longitudinal study improves the current knowledge about balance deficits during taxane therapy by quantifying the impact of taxane chemotherapy on balance during and after treatment using standardized and validated self-report and performance functional balance assessment tools.
The results of this study will improve the treatment of balance deficits in women with taxane therapy by identifying the type, onset, duration, and severity of the deficits within each balance system.
From these findings, targeted interventions, if required, could be developed.
In addition, establishing feasibility and utility for quantifying balance impairments is necessary for the development of larger studies assessing the effects of rehabilitation interventions on functional disability due to CIPN.
Such a study would be worthy of influencing changes in clinical practice to minimize disability from balance dysfunction before, during, and after chemotherapy, and thus maximizing function and quality of life during and after cancer treatment.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
19
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Pekin, Illinois, United States, 61554
- Illinois CancerCare
-
Pekin, Illinois, United States, 61554
- OSF Radiation Oncology
-
Peoria, Illinois, United States, 61615
- Illinois CancerCare
-
Peoria, Illinois, United States, 61615
- OSF Radiation Oncology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients from cancer treatment clinic and radiation oncology clinics
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women with breast cancer (stage 0-III)
Scheduled to receive any of the following individual treatment protocols:
- ACT
- Radiation only
Exclusion Criteria:
- Required assistive device for ambulation in the 6 months prior to starting treatment
- Previous taxane or platinum chemotherapy (paclitaxel/Taxol®, docetaxel/Taxotere®, cabazitaxel/Jevtana®, cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin)
- Inability to stand or walk without assistance
- BMI >40 (see chart below)
- Pre-existing vestibular, visual, somatosensory, orthopedic, and neurologic disease before entering the study including but not limited to being legally blind (ICD9 368.3, 369.0-369.2 lower extremity amputation (ICD9 895.0-897.7), and Diabetes (ICD9 249.0-250.93, 257.2)
- Evidence of central nervous system metastasis
- Cognitive difficulties or medical conditions that, in the opinion of the study investigators, will affect testing protocols
- Enrollment in other trial aimed at treating CIPN.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Breast Cancer Patients receiving ACT
Adraimycin/Cytoxan/Taxol
|
|
Breast Cancer patients receiving RT only
radiation therapy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration of Balance at 9 months.
Time Frame: An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
|
assessment of static balance under conditions eyes open on firm surface, eyes closed on firm surface, eyes open on foam surface, and eyes closed on foam surface
|
An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline Five Times Sit to STand
Time Frame: An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
|
Time in seconds it takes to stand up and sit down from a standard height chair
|
An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
|
|
Change from baseline Visual Contrast Sensitivity
Time Frame: An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
|
Using the Mars Letter Chart, a contrast sensitivity score is calculated
|
An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
|
|
Change from baseline Touch Detection Threshold
Time Frame: An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
|
The lightest Von Frey Filament able to be detected using the up/down method is recorded on 3 places of each foot
|
An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
|
|
Change from baseline Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire
Time Frame: An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
|
Likert scale describing the level of intensity of lower extremity neuropathy symptoms and their interference with functional activities
|
An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
|
|
Change from baseline Patient Neuropathy Function Questionnaire
Time Frame: An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
|
number of falls are recorded, as well as Likert scales for various functional activities
|
An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
|
|
Change from baseline Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale
Time Frame: An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
|
Quality of life scale validated for the breast cancer population
|
An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Carl Asche, PhD, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria
- Study Director: Jinma Ren, PhD, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria
- Principal Investigator: Catherine Horst, DPT, IPMR
- Study Director: Nguyet Le-Lindqwister, MD, Illinois CancerCare
- Study Director: Anthony Zalduendo, MD, OSF Radiation Oncology
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Whitney SL, Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Gee MA, Redfern MS, Furman JM. Clinical measurement of sit-to-stand performance in people with balance disorders: validity of data for the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test. Phys Ther. 2005 Oct;85(10):1034-45.
- Hausheer FH, Schilsky RL, Bain S, Berghorn EJ, Lieberman F. Diagnosis, management, and evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Semin Oncol. 2006 Feb;33(1):15-49. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.12.010.
- Tofthagen C, Overcash J, Kip K. Falls in persons with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Support Care Cancer. 2012 Mar;20(3):583-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1127-7. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
- Wampler MA, Topp KS, Miaskowski C, Byl NN, Rugo HS, Hamel K. Quantitative and clinical description of postural instability in women with breast cancer treated with taxane chemotherapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Aug;88(8):1002-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.007.
- Winters-Stone KM, Torgrimson B, Horak F, Eisner A, Nail L, Leo MC, Chui S, Luoh SW. Identifying factors associated with falls in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors: a multi-disciplinary approach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Apr;92(4):646-52. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.10.039. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
- Lord SR, Menz HB. Visual contributions to postural stability in older adults. Gerontology. 2000 Nov-Dec;46(6):306-10. doi: 10.1159/000022182.
- Shimozuma K, Ohashi Y, Takeuchi A, Aranishi T, Morita S, Kuroi K, Ohsumi S, Makino H, Mukai H, Katsumata N, Sunada Y, Watanabe T, Hausheer FH. Feasibility and validity of the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire during taxane chemotherapy in a phase III randomized trial in patients with breast cancer: N-SAS BC 02. Support Care Cancer. 2009 Dec;17(12):1483-91. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0613-7. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
- Dougherty BE, Flom RE, Bullimore MA. An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Nov;82(11):970-5. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000187844.27025.ea.
- Mancini M, Horak FB. The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Jun;46(2):239-48.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 16, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
June 16, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 12, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
March 18, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 28, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 26, 2019
Last Verified
August 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 599231-1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgRecruitingQuality of Life | Postoperative Quality of Recovery | Health-Related Quality-of-LifeBelgium
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaCompletedImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
Children's National Research InstituteCompletedProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Mattu UniversityCompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life ofEthiopia
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Institute of Oncology LjubljanaUnknownHealth-related Quality of LifeSlovenia
-
Oslo University HospitalNorwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in PhysiotherapyCompletedHealth-Related Quality of LifeNorway