The Effect of Taxane Chemotherapy on Balance in Breast Cancer Patients (IPMR Balance)

August 26, 2019 updated by: Catherine Horst, OSF Healthcare System
The purpose of this study is to quantify the balance impairments during and after taxane chemotherapy. Disability due to balance impairments caused by chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) can cause falls, injury, and a decline in independence. This results in poor treatment outcomes such as greater morbidity and mortality, inability to complete treatment protocols, self-limitation of activity, and diminished quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to describe the balance deficits prior to the initiation of taxane therapy and through the duration of treatment and compare balance to a cohort of women without taxane therapy. To our knowledge, a study like this has not been done yet it is a necessary next step in order to evaluate whether balance deficits resolve independent of treatment or if the balance deficits require targeted therapy. Other studies evaluating balance in taxane patients, have used cross-sectional study designs that are limited to observation at one point in time. Further, other evaluations have been limited in the measurement of balance using only self-report questionnaires, with no performance measurements of functional balance. Previous studies of other conditions have shown poor concordance between self-report questionnaires and performance measures. Therefore, our proposed longitudinal study improves the current knowledge about balance deficits during taxane therapy by quantifying the impact of taxane chemotherapy on balance during and after treatment using standardized and validated self-report and performance functional balance assessment tools. The results of this study will improve the treatment of balance deficits in women with taxane therapy by identifying the type, onset, duration, and severity of the deficits within each balance system. From these findings, targeted interventions, if required, could be developed. In addition, establishing feasibility and utility for quantifying balance impairments is necessary for the development of larger studies assessing the effects of rehabilitation interventions on functional disability due to CIPN. Such a study would be worthy of influencing changes in clinical practice to minimize disability from balance dysfunction before, during, and after chemotherapy, and thus maximizing function and quality of life during and after cancer treatment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Pekin, Illinois, United States, 61554
        • Illinois CancerCare
      • Pekin, Illinois, United States, 61554
        • OSF Radiation Oncology
      • Peoria, Illinois, United States, 61615
        • Illinois CancerCare
      • Peoria, Illinois, United States, 61615
        • OSF Radiation Oncology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients from cancer treatment clinic and radiation oncology clinics

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Women with breast cancer (stage 0-III)
  2. Scheduled to receive any of the following individual treatment protocols:

    1. ACT
    2. Radiation only

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Required assistive device for ambulation in the 6 months prior to starting treatment
  2. Previous taxane or platinum chemotherapy (paclitaxel/Taxol®, docetaxel/Taxotere®, cabazitaxel/Jevtana®, cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin)
  3. Inability to stand or walk without assistance
  4. BMI >40 (see chart below)
  5. Pre-existing vestibular, visual, somatosensory, orthopedic, and neurologic disease before entering the study including but not limited to being legally blind (ICD9 368.3, 369.0-369.2 lower extremity amputation (ICD9 895.0-897.7), and Diabetes (ICD9 249.0-250.93, 257.2)
  6. Evidence of central nervous system metastasis
  7. Cognitive difficulties or medical conditions that, in the opinion of the study investigators, will affect testing protocols
  8. Enrollment in other trial aimed at treating CIPN.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Breast Cancer Patients receiving ACT
Adraimycin/Cytoxan/Taxol
Breast Cancer patients receiving RT only
radiation therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration of Balance at 9 months.
Time Frame: An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
assessment of static balance under conditions eyes open on firm surface, eyes closed on firm surface, eyes open on foam surface, and eyes closed on foam surface
An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Five Times Sit to STand
Time Frame: An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
Time in seconds it takes to stand up and sit down from a standard height chair
An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
Change from baseline Visual Contrast Sensitivity
Time Frame: An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
Using the Mars Letter Chart, a contrast sensitivity score is calculated
An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
Change from baseline Touch Detection Threshold
Time Frame: An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
The lightest Von Frey Filament able to be detected using the up/down method is recorded on 3 places of each foot
An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
Change from baseline Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire
Time Frame: An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
Likert scale describing the level of intensity of lower extremity neuropathy symptoms and their interference with functional activities
An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
Change from baseline Patient Neuropathy Function Questionnaire
Time Frame: An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
number of falls are recorded, as well as Likert scales for various functional activities
An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
Change from baseline Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale
Time Frame: An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.
Quality of life scale validated for the breast cancer population
An average of 5 months for the controls, and 9 months for the cases.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Carl Asche, PhD, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria
  • Study Director: Jinma Ren, PhD, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria
  • Principal Investigator: Catherine Horst, DPT, IPMR
  • Study Director: Nguyet Le-Lindqwister, MD, Illinois CancerCare
  • Study Director: Anthony Zalduendo, MD, OSF Radiation Oncology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 16, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 16, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 599231-1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Subscribe