Central Venous Catheter Insertion Train the Trainer

September 5, 2019 updated by: Jeffrey Barsuk, Northwestern University

Dissemination of a Simulation-based Mastery Learning Curriculum for Central Venous Catheter Insertion at Veterans Affairs Hospitals: A Quantitative Study

The investigators previously successfully implemented a central venous catheter (CVC) simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) curriculum at Northwestern University. As a result, trainee skill improved, complications, including central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) decreased and the curriculum was proven cost-effective. Therefore the Veterans Administration Medical Centers (VAMC) decided to implement this training at some of their sites as a quality improvement project. The investigators will train faculty at these locations to implement the same curriculum at their individual sites. Outcome data will be collected to evaluate the outcomes of the quality improvement (QI) project (complications, infections, skills).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Beginning in 2006, Northwestern University Internal Medicine and Emergency Medicine residents completed simulation-based mastery learning in central venous catheter (CVC) insertion before clinical rotations in the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU). This comprehensive program in central line training used repetitive practice and simulation technology to train residents to mastery standards. This study had important patient safety implications. This program resulted in improved trainee skill and reduced CVC insertion complications, including a significant decrease in the rate of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). In addition, the investigators showed that the in CVC insertion was highly cost-effective suggesting that investment in simulation training can produce significant medical care cost savings.

This curriculum has now been successfully implemented at a few other sites. Due to the investigators' success, the VA has requested that Medical Error Reduction and Certification, Inc.(MERCI) along with Northwestern University, implements the curriculum at its sites across the county as a quality improvement project. Using a train the trainer course in CVC placement, the investigators are interested in analyzing the data that the VAMC will provide to MERCI and studying the outcomes.

Four Northwestern faculty completed a CVC insertion Master trainer curriculum. One master trainer travels to each VA facility in the program to facilitate a two-day train-the-trainer course on CVC insertion SBML. Each VA facility selects one or two "faculty champions" who complete CVC insertion SBML course and learn how to teach the curriculum on day 1 and are observed training and assessing peer healthcare providers at their institution on day 2. Course materials include standardized videos and lectures, role-playing and practice with sample learners and CVC insertion assessments. In addition to the onsite master trainer, each VA facility receives necessary training materials (standardized video lectures, data collection forms, assessment tools) and equipment (CentralLineMan simulators, ultrasound) to implement the curriculum at their institution. All participants complete pre and post testing and a course evaluation questionnaire. Quantitative outcome data on learner skills and CVC insertion quality measures are collected to measure the overall success of the project.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

226

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  1. Trainees undergoing simulation-based mastery learning for CVC insertion
  2. De-identified patient information from patients with a CVC.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Previously (or prospectively) collected de-identified data on trainee skill and experience
  2. Previously (or prospectively) collected de-identified data on patients in the VA ICU with CVCs
  3. Previously (or prospectively) collected de-identified data on mechanical complications in the ICUs

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Data not de-identified
  2. Data on pts on non-ICU units
  3. Data on pts without CVCs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Traditionally-trained
Patients who undergo CVC procedures by traditionally-trained providers who have not undergone simulation-based mastery learning. This could be retrospective (before the study started) or at a site where the training was not implemented.
CVC Train the Trainer
Patients who undergo CVC procedures by providers who have participated in simulation-based mastery learning.
Trainees receive a simulation-based mastery learning intervention and train-the-trainer program on central venous catheter insertion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The effectiveness of simulation based mastery learning for CVC insertion on CLABSIs
Time Frame: 3 years
Data from infection control on central line associated bloodstream infections will be reported for all sites each month. The investigators plan to compare the trained ICU's infection rates with other ICUs at other sites in addition to comparing the trained period versus the untrained period while trainees were rotating through the MICU.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The effectiveness of simulation based mastery learning for CVC insertion on mechanical complications
Time Frame: 3 years
ICUs will collect information on actual CVC insertions including complications (need for line adjustment, arterial puncture, pneumothorax). The investigators plan to compare the trained ICU's complication rates with other ICUs at other sites in addition to comparing the trained period versus the untrained period while trainees were rotating through the MICU.
3 years
The effectiveness simulation based mastery learning for CVC insertion at the learner level using simulated checklist data and trainee surveys
Time Frame: 2 years
Using simulated checklist data and trainee surveys, the investigators will assess the effectiveness of our intervention at the learner level.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey H Barsuk, MD, MS, Northwestern University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on CVC Train the Trainer

Subscribe