Apps to Reduce the Impact That Adverse Events Among Health Professionals (ASV)

January 2, 2016 updated by: José Joaquín Mira, Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche

Designing Guides and Tools to Reduce the Impact That Adverse Events Also Have Among Professionals and Health Institutions

Adverse events are also the cause of suffering in health professionals involved (second victims). This study has the aim of design and evaluates two applications for staff of hospital and primary care settings with the intention of improving their capacity to conduct Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and to help them introducing patient safety certification (PSC).

A single-blind randomized controlled trial shall conduct with a control and an experimental group (N=84) in both cases. The characteristics of both apps shall specify based on the suggestions of health professionals and shall design for Android and IOS (for iPhone or Ipad).

The randomly subjects in the control group shall receive oral and written information and the experimental group used App for two months. Pre- and post- measures shall include: patient safety knowledge and culture and self-perceived capacity to enhance RCA or follow-up PSC. In the experimental group, data shall also collect on their previous experience with information and communication technologies, their rating of each App. The inter-group intervention effects shall calculate by univariate linear models and ANOVA, with the pre- to post-intervention differences as the dependent variables.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Adverse events (AEs) are the cause of harm and suffering in patients and may also markedly affect the work, family and personal life of health professionals involved, second victims, as well as damaging the reputation of affected health organizations (third victims), by undermining people's trust in these institutions. Between 28 and 57% of physicians (79-89% in the case of residents) recognize having being involved in medical error with serious consequences for one or more patients at some point in their career, while 90% believe that in their hospital there is insufficient help and support for professionals following an AE. In Spain, extrapolating from national AE data in hospitals and primary care, it has been estimated that 15% of healthcare professionals are involved in this type of event per year.

Guidelines and recommendations of the role of staff directive of health institutions in the field of the safety of patients have been developed with the aim to reduce the impact of adverse events in the second and third victims. The root causes analysis (RCA) and the patient safety certification (PSC) systems following the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) rules are two examples of these interventions in which staff has direct responsibility.

In this study the investigators design and assess two apps designed for Android and IOS (for iPhone or Ipad) to help staff conducting RCA or implementing PSC. To evaluate these Apps the investigators opted for a single-blind experimental design with two groups (control and experimental) and pre- and- post assessments. Subjects shall be randomly assigned to the control or experimental group. The control group shall compose of subjects who did not use experimental devices, and the experimental group of people used this tool for two months. To maintain the single-blind and be able to link the pre- and post- measurements, subjects shall assign codes as a function of their date of birth and initials. The investigators randomly select 84 subjects from health districts in Spain who develop directive function. Exclusion criteria: less than 3 years of professional experience. The sample size was calculated to detect a difference between means of at least of 10 points with a statistical power of 90% at a level of significance of α = 0.05 (in a two-tailed test). The investigators requested the informed consent of patients from both control and experimental groups. All the participating shall complete a questionnaire to assess patient safety knowledge and culture as well as self-efficacy.

Those in the control group received oral and written information regarding patient safety certification or Root Cause Analysis. Participants in the experimental group were given the apps installed and personalized according to their institution. Two months later, the measurements made pre-intervention shall repeat. Additionally, subjects from the experimental group also shall ask to evaluate apps (its performance, functionality, usability, reliability, acceptability, usefulness, design, simplicity, accessibility, and problem-solving power as well as overall satisfaction with the tool). In order to assess the effectiveness of the apps, we shall build various univariate linear models and, where there were inter-group differences in pre-intervention measurements, performed univariate linear models and ANOVA, using as the dependent variables the differences between the pre- and post-intervention measurements.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alicante
      • Elche, Alicante, Spain, 03202
        • FISABIO

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • staff

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a experience in health institutions of less than 3 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
Information package about patient safety certification or how to conduct Root Cause Analysis
Information on PSC and RCA
Experimental: Experimental
Apps: Root Cause Analysis or patient safety ISO certification
Apps for conducting RCA or PSC
Other Names:
  • Root Cause Analysis or patient safety certification Apps

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants improving their capacity to conduct Root Cause Analysis
Time Frame: two months
Effectiveness of the App to improve knowledge and skills to conduct RCA
two months
Number of participants improving their capacity to lead patient safety ISO certification review
Time Frame: two months
Effectiveness of the App to improve knowledge and skills to assure necessary task to achieve patient safety ISO certification
two months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: José Mira, PhD, FISABIO/Universidad Miguel Hernández

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15/310

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Occupational Diseases

Clinical Trials on information package

Subscribe