Pemetrexed Disodium in Treating Patients With Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and ECOG Performance Status 3

October 5, 2023 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

A Pilot Study Evaluating Pemetrexed in ECOG Performance Status 3 Patients With Stage IV Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

This pilot phase II trial studies how well pemetrexed disodium works in treating patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 3. Performance status means how well patients are able to perform daily activities and care for themselves. Patients with a performance status of 3 have a limited ability to move around. Currently, only patients who are able to perform most of their daily activities may receive chemotherapy, due to the side effects it may cause. Pemetrexed disodium causes fewer side effects than many chemotherapy drugs and may help treat patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer and a lower performance status.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate the effect of single agent pemetrexed (pemetrexed disodium) on tumor progression in ECOG performance status 3 patients with stage IV non-squamous histology non-small cell lung cancer in a single arm pilot study.

II. To evaluate the effect of single agent pemetrexed on quality of life in ECOG performance status 3 patients with stage IV non-squamous histology non-small cell lung cancer in a single arm pilot study.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate toxicity associated with single agent pemetrexed on tumor progression in ECOG performance status 3 patients with stage IV non-squamous histology non-small cell lung cancer in a single arm pilot study.

OUTLINE:

Patients receive pemetrexed disodium intravenously (IV) over 10 minutes on day 1. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for at least 30 days and then every 6 weeks thereafter.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have histologically confirmed Stage IV non-squamous histology non-small cell lung cancer
  • ECOG performance status of 3
  • Sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK) and ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS-1) mutations are either negative or unknown
  • Absolute neutrophil count >= 1,500/mcL
  • Platelets >= 100,000/mcL
  • Creatinine clearance >= 45 mL/min
  • Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation; should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent document
  • Ability to understand and complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life (QOL) instruments

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have previously received chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer, or have received radiotherapy within 2 weeks prior to entering the study, or who have not recovered from adverse events due to treatment more than 2 weeks earlier
  • Patients whose tumors are positive for the sensitizing EGFR mutation
  • Patients whose tumors are positive for the sensitizing ALK fusion
  • Patients whose tumors are positive for the sensitizing ROS-1 fusion
  • Patients may not be receiving any other investigational agents
  • Patients with symptomatic or recurrent brain metastases should be excluded from this clinical trial
  • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to pemetrexed
  • Pregnant women are excluded from this study; breastfeeding should be discontinued

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment (pemetrexed disodium)
Patients receive pemetrexed disodium IV over 10 minutes on day 1. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Quality-of-Life Assessment and Laboratory Biomarker Analysis.
Correlative studies
Given IV
Other Names:
  • Alimta
  • LY231514
  • N-[4-[2-(2-Amino-4,7-dihydro-4-oxo-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-5-yl)ethyl]benzoyl]-L-glutamic Acid Disodium Salt
QOL studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quality of Life (QOL), Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30) and QLQ-Lung Cancer 13-item (LC13)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Quality of life will be assessed at each treatment time (i.e. every three weeks). A longitudinal mixed models analysis will be used to look at QOL over the time course. A paired t-test will also be calculated to see if the average change is more than 0 (worsening) versus a two-sided alternative that the difference is 0 or better. Score range from 0-100 (1 = not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = quite a bit, or 4 = very much). The higher the score, the greater the change in the quality of life for the worse.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Time to Tumor Progression
Time Frame: The duration of time from the start of treatment to the time of progression, death, or date of last contact, assessed up to 2 years
It will be determined whether each patient has a progression (or dies) before or after 12 weeks. A 95% exact (Clopper Pearson) confidence interval will then be around the proportion with PFS greater than or equal to 12 weeks. If this confidence interval includes 50% then that would provide evidence that the therapy is potentially promising. If the upper bound of the confidence interval does not include 50% then this would indicate that the treatment may not be promising for patients. In addition, a Kaplan Meier survival curve will be constructed to describe the time to progression data.
The duration of time from the start of treatment to the time of progression, death, or date of last contact, assessed up to 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Hematologic Toxicity, Graded According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
The number and type of toxicities observed during this protocol will be estimated, focusing on unexpected grade 3 or higher toxicities. No formal statistical tests will be done on these estimates.
Up to 30 days
Overall Survival
Time Frame: The duration of time from the start of treatment to date of death or date of last contact, assessed up to 2 years
Examined by estimating a Kaplan-Meier survival curve using all patients enrolled.
The duration of time from the start of treatment to date of death or date of last contact, assessed up to 2 years
Response Rate
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Response rate will be estimated every 6 weeks for patients, and these estimates will be presented with confidence intervals.
Up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stefan Grant, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 19, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 7, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

April 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00032417
  • P30CA012197 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2015-00596 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • CCCWFU 62115
  • CCCWFU # 62115 (Other Identifier: Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Subscribe