An Investigation Into the Effects of a Wild Blueberry Powder and a Wild Blueberry Extract on Cognition in Older Adults

June 24, 2019 updated by: Prof Claire Williams, University of Reading

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Investigating the Effects of a Wild Blueberry Powder and a Wild Blueberry Extract on Cognition in Older Adults

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a 6 month dietary intervention with wild blueberry powder and extract stabilised with L-cysteine and L-glutathione have an effect on cognitive performance in participants aged between 65 - 80.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Interventions: A placebo and two different wild blueberry products will be used in this study (see Table 1). A wild blueberry powder at two different doses and a single wild blueberry extract. The wild blueberry powder will be used at a 450 mg-dose, to which 45 mg of L-Cysteine and 5 mg of L-Glutathione will be added (wild blueberry powder-450), as well as at a 900 mg-dose, to which 90 mg of L-Cysteine and 10 mg of L-Glutathione will also be added (wild blueberry powder-900). The wild blueberry extract will consist of 100 mg of wild blueberry extract supplemented with 10 mg of L-Cysteine and 1 mg of L-Glutathione. Participants will be asked to consume two capsules daily with their normal breakfast. The capsules will be packed in blister packs with 4 capsules per blister. Each box contains 4 blisters (or a total of 16 capsules) in order to provide for 1 week of study medication, with 2 capsules remaining. Participants will be instructed to return the left-over investigational product weekly (i.e two capsules) using stamped addressed envelopes supplied by the experimenters. Weekly assessment of left-over investigational product will allow for continued compliance verification.

Procedure: The study comprises of a telephone screen and then six visits, including a familiarization visit (week T-1), three test visits (week 0, 12 and 24), and two control visits (week 6 and 18). Participants may stop the study treatment without stating any reason at any time during the study. In addition, a participant will be withdrawn from the study if: a subject requests discontinuation, he/she exhibits a serious adverse event to any component of the test product, the participant significantly violates the inclusion or exclusion criteria, an intercurrent illness emerges and/or the investigator's opinion is that withdrawal is appropriate and in the best interest of the participant. If a participant withdraws from the study, he/she will be encouraged to make a final visit as soon as possible, irrespective of the reason for withdrawal, to complete a final battery of cognitive tasks.

  1. Screening: once a participant has indicated that they wish to join the trial they will be contacted by telephone for a brief screening session. The research associate (RA) will give a brief overview of the study and will ascertain that each interested volunteer is willing to participate for the entire duration of the study and to check that they fulfill our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Once confirmation of suitability for the study is confirmed, the RA will schedule their familiarization visit.
  2. Familiarization Visit: Volunteers will be asked to attend the Nutritional Psychology Unit at the University of Reading where they will receive a detailed explanation on the study by the participating research associate and will be asked to sign the informed consent form before any study procedure starts. A log will be kept identifying all participants having signed the informed consent form (ICF) and the participant will be allocated a participant number. Once consent has been given, the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be checked once again and vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate) and anthropometric measurements (height, weight, BMI) will be taken. The participants will then be asked to complete a number of questionnaires and cognitive tasks comprising: (i) Yale Physical Activity Questionnaire; (ii) Frequency of Forgetting Questionnaire to give a baseline assessment of their memory performance; and (iii) Computerized Global Cognitive Health Assessments (NART, CERAD, MMSE, letter and category fluency; unless as a member of the Older Adult Panel these data have been collected from them in the preceding 3 months). Finally, participants will be given training on the cognitive test battery (tasks outlined below) that will be used during the study to reduce the chances of 'practice' adversely effecting performance on subsequent test days. Before leaving the laboratory, participants will be asked to keep a 72 hour food diary (consisting of 2 week days & 1 weekend day) so that background flavonoid intakes can be measured prior to the start of the intervention.
  3. Test Visits (Weeks 0, 12 and 24): All of these sessions will be held in the morning (typically 8am-10am arrival time to suit participants individual needs). Participants will attend the laboratory in a fasted state and on arrival at the laboratory we will check participants still fulfill our inclusion/exclusion criteria, their general well-being, notification of any adverse events, any issues with compliance, and to check whether there have been changes to any concomitant medication. Blood pressure and heart rate will also be measured, and the food diary will be collected (week 0 and 24 only). They will then receive a standard low-flavonoid breakfast and will complete the battery of cognitive tasks (see below). Subjects will then be given their intervention (sufficient quantity until their next test session, in blister packs, weeks 0 and 12 only), and will then be requested to consume 2 capsules each day. At week 24 only, the Yale Physical Activity and Frequency of Forgetting questionnaires will also be administered, and weight will be measured.
  4. Control Visits (weeks 6 & 18): These sessions can take place at any time of day to suit the participant. Participants will attend the laboratory at the University of Reading to collect the next 6 week supply of their intervention. During these visits we will check that participants still fulfill our inclusion/exclusion criteria, informally check their well-being, inquire whether there have been any adverse events, and confirm that there have not been any changes to their concomitant medication. At week 18 only participants will be given another copy of the 72 hour food diary (consisting of 2 week days & 1 weekend day and asked to complete this before they return for their test visit in week 24.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

122

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Berkshire
      • Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom, RG6 6AH
        • University of Reading

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 80 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Overall healthy volunteers as proven by medical history and/or physical examination and of all ethnicity and socioeconomic status
  • Free-living
  • Subjects with subjective memory complaints
  • MMSE: 24-30
  • Subjects are willing to maintain their normal eating habits and exercise habits to avoid changes in body weight over the duration of the study
  • Being willing to complete the food diaries and questionnaires
  • Able to give signed written informed consent
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of complementary and alternative medicine
  • History of metabolic disorder, diabetes, substance abuse
  • Subjects diagnosed with psychiatric or neurological conditions
  • Subjects using medications that might affect the outcome measures (such as antidepressant and sleeping medication), or planned changes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Formulation containing inert artificially colored maltodextrin, once daily, in a 2-hard capsule regimen
Formulation containing inert artificially colored maltodextrin, once daily, in a 2-hard capsule regimen
Experimental: Wild Blueberry Powder - 450mg
Formulation containing 225 mg wild blueberry powder + 22.5 mg L-Cysteine + 2.5 mg L-Glutathione + 250 mg placebo powder, once daily, in a 2-hard capsule regimen
Formulation containing 225 mg wild blueberry powder + 22.5 mg L-Cysteine @ 2.5 mg L-Glutathione 250 mg placebo powder, once daily, in a 2-hard capsule regimen
Experimental: Wild Blueberry Powder - 900 mg
Formulation containing containing 450 mg wild blueberry powder + 45 mg L-Cysteine + 5 mg L-Glutathione once daily, in a 2-hard capsule regimen
Formulation containing 450 mg wild blueberry powder = 45 mg L-Cysteine + 5 mg L-Glutathione once daily, in a 2-hard capsule regimen
Experimental: Wild Blueberry extract 100mg
Formulation containing containing 100 mg wild blueberry powder + 10 mg L-Cysteine + 1 mg L-Glutathione + 389 mg of placebo, once daily, in a 2-hard capsule regimen
Formulation containing 100 mg wild blueberry powder + 10 mg L-Cysteine + 1 mg L-Glutathione + 389 mg of placebo, once daily, in a 2-hard capsule regimen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Words Correctly Recognised.
Time Frame: 12, and 24 weeks
Participants indicate whether words presented on a monitor are from a list of 15 words previously presented auditorily (via headphones), or if they are novel foils.
12, and 24 weeks
Total Number of Correct Sequences Recalled
Time Frame: 12, and 24 weeks
Participants view an array of 9 white squares on a monitor which light up red in sequences of between 2 and 9. They are then required to press the correct squares in the sequence they were presented.
12, and 24 weeks
Combined Z Score of Delayed Words Recalled, Words Recognised, and Pictures Recognised.
Time Frame: 12, and 24 weeks
Combined Z score of proportion of words recalled, proportion of words recognised, and proportion of pictures recognised. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the mean and positive numbers indicate values higher than the mean. A negative change value reflects a decrease in memory or a worse outcome and a positive change value reflects an increase in memory or a better outcome
12, and 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Combined Z Score of Mean Reaction Time Scores for Incongruent Attention Network and Stroop Task Trials.
Time Frame: 12, and 24 weeks
Combined Z Score of Mean Reaction Time Scores for Incongruent Attention Network and Stroop Task Trials. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the mean and positive numbers indicate values higher than the mean. A negative change value reflects a decrease in memory or a worse outcome and a positive change value reflects an increase in memory or a better outcome.
12, and 24 weeks
Combined Z Score of Proportion of Immediate Words Recalled, Number of Correct Serial 3 and Serial 7 Subtractions, Sternberg Task Coefficent of the Line
Time Frame: 12, and 24 weeks
Combined Z Score of Proportion of Immediate Words Recalled, Number of Correct Serial 3 and Serial 7 Subtractions, and the Coefficient of the Line for Reaction Time by Length of Sting During Probe Recall. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the mean and positive numbers indicate values higher than the mean. A negative change value reflects a decrease in memory or a worse outcome and a positive change value reflects an increase in memory or a better outcome
12, and 24 weeks
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 12, and 24 weeks.
LMM analysis of intervention group x 12 and 24 wk test session. Baseline blood pressure entered as a covariate.
12, and 24 weeks.
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 12, and 24 weeks
LMM analysis of intervention group x 12 and 24 wk test session. Baseline blood pressure entered as a covariate.
12, and 24 weeks
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 12, and 24 weeks.
LMM analysis of intervention group x 12 and 24 wk test session. Baseline heart rate entered as a covariate.
12, and 24 weeks.
Positive Affect Score
Time Frame: 12, and 24 weeks
As measured by the positive mood scale derived from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. This measure consists of 10 words relating to positive affect. The participants is asked to rate how they feel about each word from 1 (very slightly/not at all) to 5 (extremely) with a minimum score of 5 and maximum of 50. A higher score relates to higher positive affect.
12, and 24 weeks
Negative Affect Score
Time Frame: 12, and 24 weeks.
As measured by the negative mood scale derived from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. This measure consists of 10 words relating to negative affect. The participants is asked to rate how they feel about each word from 1 (very slightly/not at all) to 5 (extremely) with a minimum score of 5 and maximum of 50. A higher score relates to higher negative affect.
12, and 24 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Claire M Williams, PhD, University of Reaiding
  • Study Director: Emilie Fromentin, PhD, NATURIEX-DBS,, LLC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RDG-001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Decline

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe