Apparently Balanced Chromosomal Translocation/ Next-generation Sequencing/ Intellectual Disability (ANI)

March 22, 2017 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Molecular Characterization of Apparently Balanced Chromosomal Rearrangements by Next-generation Sequencing in 55 Patients With Intellectual Disability and/or Multiple Congenital Anomalies

Apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangement (ABCR) associated with an abnormal phenotype is a rare but problematic event. It occurs in 6% of de novo reciprocal translocations and 9% of de novo inversions. Abnormal phenotype, including intellectual disability and / or multiple congenital anomalies (ID/MCA) may be explained either by associated cryptic genomic imbalances detectable by array-CGH or by gene disruption at the breakpoint. However, breakpoint cloning using conventional methods (i.e., fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), Southern blot) is often laborious and time consuming and cannot be performed routinely. Without complete investigation of these rearrangements, genetic counseling is a real challenge. Recently, the investigators and others showed that Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) is a powerful and rapid technique to characterize ABCR breakpoints at the molecular level.

The ANI project (ABCR NGS ID) aims at characterizing at the molecular level ABCR in 55 patients presenting with intellectual disability and/or multiple congenital anomalies (ID/MCA) using NGS. The investigators make the hypothesis that ABCR account for the patient phenotype, either by gene disruption or position effect, since genomic imbalance would have been previously excluded by array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH).

The ANI project is a 3-year-long study that will be conducted by a consortium of 21 partners, including 19 french hospital cytogenetics laboratories, a research team (TIGER), and a cellular biotechnology center. Patients will be recruited by each Cytogenetics laboratory. ABCR breakpoints will be molecularly characterized by NGS and a first bio-informatics analysis. The results will be verified by amplification of junction fragments by polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) followed by Sanger sequencing, allowing the localization of breakpoints at the base-pair level. In some complex cases, FISH experiment will be necessary to clarify the results. A second bio-informatics analysis will then determine breakpoints' characteristics (sequence, repeated elements, gene and regulatory elements). Finally, for each breakpoint, gene expression studies will be performed including the gene disrupted by the breakpoint and two neighboring genes. All these data, together with those already available in the literature and databases will be integrated to determine if the gene could account for the patient's phenotype, allowing an appropriate genetic counseling.

This project will identify new candidate genes involved in ID and developmental anomalies. It will also contribute to the development and evaluation of NGS as a diagnostic tool for ABCR and ID/MCA. It will also allow unraveling mechanisms and functional consequences of ABCR, in particular in term of position effect.

In conclusion, the ANI project will contribute to the improvement of diagnostic management and genetic counseling of patients with ID/MCA and ABCR. It will also contribute to the understanding of ABCR physiopathology and to the unraveling of pathway involved in development and brain function, thus improving genetic counseling for ID/MCA patients in general.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bron, France, 69677
        • laboratoire de Cytogénétique Constitutionnelle - Centre de Biologie et Pathologie Est

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients presenting intellectual disability and/or multiple congenital anomalies

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Abnormal phenotype: intellectual disability and/or multiple congenital anomalies.
  • Post-natal cases
  • ABCR diagnosed by standard karyotype, including reciprocal translocation, inversion, insertion and Complex Chromosomal Rearrangement (CCR).
  • de novo ABCR. Inherited ABCR could be included if the transmitting parent shows also an abnormal phenotype or if the rearrangement involves an imprinted chromosome.
  • Array-CGH results normal that mean absence of pathogenic imbalances. Identification of Variant Of Unknown Significance (VOUS) does not prevent from inclusion.
  • Information and written consent of patient or his legal representative (information and consent form available on request).
  • Covered by a Health System

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pathogenic genomic imbalance demonstrated by array-CGH.
  • Identification of an independent etiology (i.e. monogenic disease, environment,…).
  • Rejection to participate ton the study
  • Weight inferior to 6 kg

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Sequencing
Blood sampling will be carried out in all patients ; molecular analysis and sequencing will be performed on these samples

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of candidate genes and genes responsible for the phenotype disrupted at the breakpoints
Time Frame: At the end of the study (36 months)
Blood samples will be collected at inclusion ; analysis wil be performed at the end of the study (between 30 and 36 months)
At the end of the study (36 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development of a routine bio-informatic protocol for analysis of ABCR by NGS
Time Frame: At the end of the study (36 months)
Ratio between the number of breakpoints detected by both karyotype ans NGS and the number of breakpoints detected by karyotype alone.
At the end of the study (36 months)
Number of patients presenting at least one disrupted gene
Time Frame: At the end of the study (36 months)
This outcome will help us ti confirm the NGS performance for the detection of breakpoints of ABCR.
At the end of the study (36 months)
Number of patients for which a diagnosis could be performed
Time Frame: At the end of the study (36 months)
Number of patients for which a diagnosis could be performed (responsible gene) compared to the total number of patients. This ration will be compared to a reference raio of 10% by a unilateral test. This will allow us to evaluate a next-generation sequencing strategy in clinical context (diagnostic yield)
At the end of the study (36 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Congenital Abnormalities

Clinical Trials on Blood sampling

3
Subscribe