Photodynamic Therapy for PDA in NV AMD

November 8, 2021 updated by: Duke University

Adjunctive Photodynamic Therapy for Persistent Disease Activity in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

The purpose of this prospective observational study is to assess the potential clinical effects of adjunctive verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) for persistent disease activity among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV AMD). No specific interventions will occur as part of the study; participating subjects undergoing PDT as part of standard-of-care will be asked to consent to prospective collection of data from their medical records for up to five years from the date of consent, including results from ophthalmologic exams, imaging, and treatments. The primary study outcome will be the percentage of subjects with resolution of persistent disease activity at six months post-PDT treatment. Aside from a small risk of loss of confidentiality, risks associated with this study are no greater than those related to standard of care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

NV AMD remains the leading cause of vision loss among people over 65. Intravitreal injections with drugs that block vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a major protein mediator of angiogenesis and vascular leakage, have revolutionized treatment of NV AMD. However, less than 40% of treated patients have clinically significant improvement in vision. Further, in spite of continuous monthly anti-VEGF therapy, up to 40-50% of patients demonstrate persistent disease activity (PDA), defined as (1) unresolved intraretinal, subretinal, or sub-retinal pigment epithelium fluid; (2) progressive lesion enlargement and fibrosis; and/or (3) persistent or new hemorrhage, assessed after either loading dose therapy or after sustained treatment with anti-VEGF. Since affected patients are at increased risk for long-term vision loss, PDA remains a vital clinical unmet need.

Verteporfin PDT (Visudyne®, Bausch+Lomb) was approved over 10 years ago by the FDA for treatment of NV AMD, prior to the advent of anti-VEGF therapy. As a monotherapy, PDT is much less effective than anti-VEGF therapy in improving vision for NV AMD patients. Furthermore, in general, PDT in combination with anti-VEGF therapy does not offer benefit over anti-VEGF therapy alone, when assessed among previously treatment-naïve NV AMD patients. However, it is unknown whether adjunctive PDT may be effective for the treatment of PDA. The investigators have performed several retrospective studies of PDA and adjunctive PDT among NV AMD patients in the Duke Medical Retina practice. Preliminary results indicate that moderate to severe PDA occurs in over 40% of NV AMD patients, and that adjunctive verteporfin PDT may be effective in improving PDA and vision for affected patients.

The present study will assess potential clinical benefits of adjunctive PDT for NV AMD patients with PDA in spite of anti-VEGF therapy in a prospective observational clinical case series.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke Eye Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with NVAMD with evidence of PDA in spite of loading dose intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of NV AMD
  • Evidence of PDA in spite of loading dose intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy. PDA is defined as (1) unresolved intraretinal, subretinal, or sub-retinal pigment epithelium fluid; (2) progressive lesion enlargement and fibrosis; and/or (3) persistent or new hemorrhage.
  • Undergoing adjunctive verteporfin PDT for the treatment of PDA
  • Able to give written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior PDT treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
NVAMD Patients with PDA
No Intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of subjects with resolution of PDA
Time Frame: Six months post-PDT treatment
Six months post-PDT treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean change in best-corrected ETDRS visual acuity from baseline
Time Frame: Six months post-PDT treatment
Six months post-PDT treatment
Percentage of subjects with 2-line ETDRS visual acuity gain from baseline
Time Frame: Six months post-PDT treatment
Six months post-PDT treatment
Percentage of subjects with 2-line ETDRS visual acuity loss from baseline
Time Frame: Six months post-PDT treatment
Six months post-PDT treatment
Mean change in central foveal thickness by SD-OCT from baseline
Time Frame: Six months post-PDT treatment
Six months post-PDT treatment
Mean change in choroidal neovascularization lesion size by fluorescein angiography from baseline
Time Frame: Six months post-PDT treatment
Six months post-PDT treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Scott Cousins, MD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 11, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 25, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on No Intervention

3
Subscribe