Impact of a Data-driven Monitor Alarm Reduction Strategy Implemented in Safety Huddles

June 1, 2017 updated by: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
This is a pragmatic, paired, cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a safety huddle-based intervention on physiologic monitor alarm rates on pediatric inpatient units.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Hospital physiologic monitors can alert clinicians to early signs of physiologic deterioration, and thus have great potential to be life-saving. However, monitors generate frequent alarms, most of which are non-actionable.

When clinicians become overburdened with alarms, they begin to exhibit alarm fatigue: responding more slowly to alarms or ignoring alarms entirely. In this protocol the investigators outline the methods they will use to evaluate the impact of a safety huddle-based intervention on physiologic monitor alarm rates using a pragmatic, paired, cluster-randomized controlled trial with the intervention delivered at the unit level. This work is considered quality improvement research, and some of the approaches described in this protocol are from the field of quality improvement.

Currently, at most hospitals data like this on the numbers of alarms that patients generate are only available to researchers with the software tools needed to interrogate and record data from the monitor network. The goal of this proposal is to bring this data to the safety huddles occurring daily on inpatient units in an accessible format to help teams make informed decisions about monitoring and minimize the potential of harm from alarm fatigue.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

77280

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria: Any nurse, physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant caring for a patient whose alarms are discussed in a safety huddle on an intervention unit.

Exclusion criteria: none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Arm
Usual care.
Experimental: Intervention Arm
Safety huddle alarm intervention.
The intervention consists of a monitor alarm dashboard that displays the numbers and types of alarms for each patient, and an accompanying checklist to guide data-driven discussion of 2-4 patients with high alarm rates.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in the unit-wide rate of alarms per patient-day at 44 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 44 weeks
Baseline and 44 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pre-post huddle patient-level difference in differences of alarm rates
Time Frame: The 24 hours before a safety huddle opportunity versus the 24 hours before a safety huddle opportunity
The difference in the rate of alarms in individual patients in the 24 hours after discussion in a huddle compared with themselves in the 24 hours before the huddle, patients on the same unit as the huddle but whose alarms are not discussed, and patients on units without the alarm huddle intervention.
The 24 hours before a safety huddle opportunity versus the 24 hours before a safety huddle opportunity
Implementation outcomes
Time Frame: Within 4 hours after the huddle intervention occurred
Proportion of huddles in post-implementation data collection period that included discussion of at least 1 patient's alarms, proportion of patients in whom a change in monitor delay time was recommended who had delay time changed in a direction consistent with the recommendations within 4 hours
Within 4 hours after the huddle intervention occurred

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15-011896

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hospitalization

Clinical Trials on safety huddle alarm intervention

3
Subscribe