Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes After the Use of SYSTANE® HYDRATION

May 31, 2018 updated by: Alcon Research

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes Following the Use of SYSTANE® HYDRATION in Subjects With Dry Eye

The purpose of this study is to compare SYSTANE® HYDRATION to Hyabak 0.15% based on total ocular surface staining scores (TOSS) at Day 42.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Subjects will first be dispensed preservative-free 0.9% saline eye drops (saline eye drops) to be used during the Run-in phase between Screening Visit and Day 0 (Visit 1). Subjects who qualify will be randomized in a 1:1 manner to receive either treatment with SYSTANE® HYDRATION Lubricant Eye Drops or Hyabak 0.15% Eye Drops.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

114

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing and able to attend all study visits;
  • Use of non-BAK (Benzalkonium Chloride) artificial tears at least once a day, for at least 3 months prior to Screening Visit;
  • Diagnosis of Dry Eye (by a health care professional) for at least 3 months prior to Screening Visit;
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant or breast feeding;
  • Any hypersensitivity to the use of the study products or an allergy to any ingredient(s) contained within study products;
  • Ocular abnormalities in either eye that could adversely affect the safety or efficacy outcome;
  • Active ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal) or active inflammation not associated with dry eye;
  • Use of chronic systemic medications: (prescription, over the counter, vitamins/supplements) on a stable dose for less than 30 days prior to Screening Visit, or any anticipated change in dosing regimen during the course of the study;
  • History of ocular or intraocular surgery or serious ocular trauma in either eye within 6 months prior to Screening Visit;
  • Any medical condition (systemic or ophthalmic) that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, preclude the safe administration of study products or safe participation in the study;
  • Use of any topical ocular over-the-counter or prescribed medications in either eye (with the exception of artificial tears/gels/ lubricants) 2 weeks prior to Screening Visit;
  • Contact lens use within 2 weeks prior to Screening Visit and unwilling to avoid contact lens use during the course of the study;
  • Unwilling to avoid the use of additional artificial tears (other than the study products) throughout the study;
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SYSTANE HYDRATION
SYSTANE HYDRATION lubricant eye drops, 1 drop 4 times per day (QID) in each eye for 42 days
Preserved with POLYQUAD (polidronium chloride) 0.001%
Other Names:
  • SYSTANE® HYDRATION
Preservative-free, one drop 4 times a day in each eye (run-in period)
Active Comparator: Hyabak 0.15%
Hyabak 0.15% eye drops, 1 drop 4 times per day (QID) in each eye for 42 days
Preservative-free, one drop 4 times a day in each eye (run-in period)
Preservative-free
Other Names:
  • Hyabak 0.15%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Total Ocular Surface Staining (TOSS) Score at Day 42
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 42
The TOSS score is a cumulative cornea and conjunctival staining score. After instilling ophthalmic dye in the eye, the investigator graded 3 areas of the ocular surface for dryness on a scale from 0 to 5, where 0=Absent and 5=Severe. The 3 scores were summed for a resultant overall 0-15 score. A more negative change value indicates greater efficacy. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Day 0), Day 42

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in IDEEL Treatment Effectiveness Score at Day 42
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 42
The IDEEL is 10-question patient-reported outcome questionnaire that assesses the subject's general satisfaction with treatment use. A resultant overall 0-100 satisfaction score was calculated, with a higher score indicating greater satisfaction and less treatment-related bother.
Baseline (Day 0), Day 42
Change From Baseline in IDEEL Treatment Inconvenience Score at Day 42
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 42
The IDEEL is 10-question patient-reported outcome questionnaire that assesses the subject's general satisfaction with treatment use. A resultant overall 0-100 satisfaction score was calculated, with a higher score indicating greater satisfaction and less treatment-related bother.
Baseline (Day 0), Day 42
Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT) at Day 42
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 42
TFBUT is defined as the time elapsed from the last blink until 1 or more dry spots appeared in the precorneal tear film. A longer tear film break-up time indicates a more stable tear film and may lead to improvement in dry eye symptoms. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Day 0), Day 42

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Global Trial Leader, Global Development Operations, Alcon, A Novartis Division

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 17, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 26, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 26, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 12, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye

Clinical Trials on SYSTANE HYDRATION lubricant eye drops

3
Subscribe