Predetermination for Gingival Recession

Predetermınatıon of Root Coverage for Recessıons Treated wıth Coronally Advanced Flap wıth Connectıve Tissue Graft: An Exploratıve Study

Background: The aim of present clinical study was to evaluate the predictive values of baseline inter-dental papilla height (IPH), avascular exposed root surface area (AERSA) and inter-dental clinical attachment loss (CAL) measurements on complete root coverage (CRC) of single gingival recession (GR) defects treated with coronally advanced flap and connective tissue graft technique (CAF+CTG).

Material and Methods: The study group included 65 females and 57 males, aged between 20 and 42 years. A total of 122 recession defects without CAL and with an amount of CAL equal or smaller to the buccal CAL , located at upper and lower incisors and canines were treated with CAF+CTG. IPH, AERSA and CAL parameters were analyzed for possible correlation with CRC after 6 months.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Gingival Recessions
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft

Detailed Description

The coronally advanced flap (CAF) with connective tissue graft (CTG) has been confirmed as the gold standard for treatment of gingival recessions ). CTG-based procedures provide the best outcomes with superior percentages of mean root coverage (MRC) and complete root coverage (CRC) and keratinized tissue (KT) gain. Data in previous reports show CRC range from 18% to 83% after CAF+CTG in Miller Classes I and II defects which are associated with no inter-dental clinical attachment loss (interdental-CAL) (Recession Type 1-RT1)

The use of CTG under CAF significantly enhances the probability to achieve CRC (%57) in recessions in which interdental-CAL is equal or smaller than the buccal attachment loss (Recession Type 2-RT2). It has been emphasized that CRC percentage was very similar to the result (60%) of a multicentre study on the treatment of RT1 recessions (Cortellini et al. 2009). Moreover, CRC was higher than most of the reports on treatment of RT1 or Miller I and II defects (more than 80%) when baseline interdental-CAL was between 1 and 3 mm Therefore, various CRC outcomes of the literature indicate that there is need for additional defect defining criteria for predicting the outcomes of root coverage (RC) in RT 1 and RT2 (interdental-CAL≤ 3mm) recession defects.

Predetermination of final RC which is important for distinguishing 'expected versus actual' amount of RC was found to be related to inter-dental papilla height (IPH) and inter-dental clinical attachment level (ICAL) by the clinical studies which reported correlation between these two anatomical characteristics and CRC. Recently a new predictive classification of gingival recessions using the baseline avascular exposed root surface area (AERSA) as an identification criterion has been proposed. AERSA resulted as a strong predictor of final RC after laterally positioned flap (LPF) leading to a prognostic model with AERSA explaining 86% of the mean root coverage. In addition, due to anatomic variations, some Miller Class I defects may have larger AERSA than Miller Class II and III defects or there may be smaller Miller Class III defects than Miller Class I and II defects which may significantly influence the treatment results. These results could help to explain the outcome variations among previous studies.

The prognostic anticipation of a certain amount of RC is a complex process including patient-related, tooth/site-related (GRD, root abrasion, ICAL, tooth type, the dimension of inter-dental papilla, AERSA) and technique-related (e.g. quality of the CTG) factors and operator's skill. It is essential to define the most potent prognostic factors' combination which can increase the success and predictability rates, to make CAF+CTG the most convenient RC technique for patients and clinicians. Therefore the aim of this study was to explore the predictive values of baseline IPH, AERSA and ICAL measurements on the final RC outcomes after CAF+CTG in RT1 and RT2 class GR defects.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 122
• Phase: Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 20 years to 42 years (ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Presence of isolated RT1 and RT2 class gingival recessions with an AERSA ˃9mm2 on upper and lower incisors,
• Presence of identifiable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ); presence of a step ≤1mm at the CEJ level and/or the presence of a root abrasion, but with an identifiable CEJ,
• Full-mouth plaque score and Full-mouth bleeding score of <15%,
• No occlusal interferences;

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria were:

• Patients with a history of periodontitis or abscess formation,
• Mucogingival or periodontal surgery at the experimental site in the last 1 year,
• Presence of systemic disease or taking medication known to interfere with periodontal tissue health,
• Smokers, pregnant patients.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
• Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
• Masking: SINGLE

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: gingival recession type 1; recession defects without CAL intervention:Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft	Other: Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft; Two oblique, divergent releasing incisions extending beyond the mucogingival junction were performed. An intra-sulcular incision was performed at the buccal aspect of the involved tooth. Subsequently, a partial-thickness flap was raised beyond the MGJ. The papilla adjacent to the involved tooth were then de-epithelialized. The CTG was harvested using a single incision approach from the palate. The graft was positioned on the instrumented root surface immediately apical of the CEJ and then stabilized using a sling compressive crossing suture. The flap was coronally displaced 1-2 mm above the CEJ. A sling suture was placed to stabilize the flap in a coronal position, followed by interrupted sutures on the releasing incisions with an apico-coronal direction.; Other Names: CAF+CTG
OTHER: gingival recession type 2; gingival recession with an amount of CAL equal or smaller to the buccal CAL. Intervention: Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft	Other: Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft; Two oblique, divergent releasing incisions extending beyond the mucogingival junction were performed. An intra-sulcular incision was performed at the buccal aspect of the involved tooth. Subsequently, a partial-thickness flap was raised beyond the MGJ. The papilla adjacent to the involved tooth were then de-epithelialized. The CTG was harvested using a single incision approach from the palate. The graft was positioned on the instrumented root surface immediately apical of the CEJ and then stabilized using a sling compressive crossing suture. The flap was coronally displaced 1-2 mm above the CEJ. A sling suture was placed to stabilize the flap in a coronal position, followed by interrupted sutures on the releasing incisions with an apico-coronal direction.; Other Names: CAF+CTG

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
values of baseline interdental papill height	in mm	1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
avascular exposed root surface area	.n mm2	1 year
interdental clinical attachment level	in mm	1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Cukurova University
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Onur Ozcelik, Prof. Dr, Professor

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: January 1, 2013
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): January 1, 2014
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: June 17, 2015
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 19, 2015
• First Posted (ESTIMATE): June 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE): June 24, 2015
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 19, 2015
• Last Verified: June 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: prognostic factors
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Stomatognathic Diseases; Periodontal Diseases; Mouth Diseases; Gingival Diseases; Periodontal Atrophy; Gingival Recession
• Other Study ID Numbers: CukurovaU5