Quality of Life in Patients With Double Loop Ureteral Stent (JJ Silicone Hydrogel Study)

July 1, 2015 updated by: Coloplast A/S

Effect of a Silicone Hydrocoated Double Loop Ureteral Stent on Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing F-URS for Kidney Stone; a Comparative Randomized Multicenter Clinical Study.

This study is a prospective, randomized multicenter study conducted in Europe. It is designed to compare two double loop ureteral stents in terms of the quality of life in patients operated on a kidney stone and requiring the placement of a double loop ureteral stent at the end of the operation.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

  • The double loop stents are used for both prevention and treatment of ureteral obstruction: They permit the interim internal bypass drainage of urine when obstruction in the ureter especially in cases of lithiasis or after surgical intervention on the upper urinary tract.
  • There are many indications for double loop stent placement and population chosen for this study are adult patients with intra-renal calcium calculi of 7-20 mm in diameter for whom the treatment indication is a flexible ureterorenoscopy.
  • The aims of the use of a double loop stent are to

    • prevent complications (pain, infection) associated with the ureteral obstruction by any residual stone fragments, blood clot or local oedema generated by the intervention.
    • preserve the renal function.
    • facilitate healing process while limiting the risk of stenosis and probably reduce the rate of readmission after patients' discharge.
  • Double loop Stent-related symptoms have a high prevalence and may affect over 80% of patients.
  • Assessment tools are important to determine the symptoms intensity and allow for comparisons at different times. The Urinary Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) is the most adapted tool designed for this purpose.
  • An ideal ureteral stent is expected to drain well, to be easy to insert and to be comfortable for the patients. The investigators designed a hydro-coated Silicone JJ stent with additional properties for improving patient's comfort.
  • The investigators decided to perform a randomized clinical investigation to evaluate the Coloplast Hydrocoated Silicone JJ in comparison to the Boston Percuflex Plus JJ stent on patients' comfort.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

140

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75020
        • Recruiting
        • Service de Chirurgie Urologique de l'Hôpital Tenon
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male and female patients
  2. Aged > 18 years
  3. Unilateral renal non-infection stone for whom the treatment indication is a flexible ureterorenoscopy (multiple kidney stones are acceptable provided that only one side is currently symptomatic)
  4. Index stone of 5-25 mm (measured on plain abdomen X-Ray KUB or CT)
  5. Without any currently implanted JJ stent
  6. Patient agreed to participate to the study and having signed the consent form
  7. Able to complete self-rated questionnaires.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute ureteric/nephritic colic (residual pain is acceptable)
  2. Any type of chronic pain
  3. Large stones > 25 mm
  4. Infection renal stone already diagnosed and documented
  5. Malformation of urinary tract (e.g. Horseshoe kidney, duplicity or, ureterocele, mega ureter)
  6. Diverticulum stone
  7. Urogenital tumor
  8. Any significant neurological disease or injury impacting sensation
  9. JJ stents already implanted
  10. Patients with long-term indwelling urethral catheter
  11. No indication for JJ insertion (e.g. spontaneous stone passage)
  12. Untreated urinary tract infection
  13. Ureteral obstruction (stenosis, compression, calculi)
  14. Neurogenic bladder
  15. Overactive bladder
  16. Bladder stone
  17. Chronic prostatitis
  18. BPH treated (recent initiation of 5 alpha-Reductase Inhibitor or Phytotherapeutic agents)
  19. Ongoing Alpha-Blocker or Anticholinergic medication
  20. Pregnancy
  21. Any event discovered during the endoscopy which is not compatible with the study design and objective

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Coloplast Hydrocoated silicone JJ stent
Double loop ureteral stent endoscopic placement
A JJ stent placement may be indicated at the end of the endourological removal of kidney stones to ensure urine drainage and cicatrisation
Active Comparator: Boston Percuflex Plus JJ stent
Double loop ureteral stent endoscopic placement
A JJ stent placement may be indicated at the end of the endourological removal of kidney stones to ensure urine drainage and cicatrisation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
USSQ scale (Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire)
Time Frame: at day 20
at day 20

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evaluate impact on quality of life via the USSQ questionnaire assessing 5 other scores and adverse event reporting at all visits.
Time Frame: Day 2, 7 and 35
Day 2, 7 and 35

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Encrustation of double loop ureteral stents
Time Frame: after 20 days (JJ stent removal)
Encrustation of double loop ureteral stents is evaluated by a score of integer values ranging from 0 to 6
after 20 days (JJ stent removal)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Olivier PJ Traxer, Professor, Service de Chirurgie Urologique de l'Hôpital Tenon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 3, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Calculi

Clinical Trials on Double Loop Ureteral stent endoscopic placement.

Subscribe