IVM for Patients With Low Ovarian Response. Does it Improve IVFoutcomes and Does it Improve the Following IVF Cycle?

November 26, 2019 updated by: Sheba Medical Center

IVM Treatment in Patients With Low Ovarian Response. Does it Improve IVF Outcome or May it Cause Activation of Ovarian Follicles and Increase the Chances of Success in the Following IVF Cycle?

Poor ovarian response (POR) is one of the major therapeutic challenges in in vitro fertilization. Several therapeutic approaches for POR have been explored; yet, a single effective strategy has not yet been established. Recently, a live birth was reported after ovarian cortex fragmentation and in vitro disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway and activation of Akt signaling. During IVM procedure increased mechanical stimulation of the ovarian cortex takes place. , with the consequent disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway. Our aim is to investigate whether the mechanical manipulation and triggering of ovarian cortex caused by IVM can cause ovarian follicular activation and recruitment by the mechanisms mentioned above. Thus stimulation in the following regular IVF cycle will result in improved ovarian response and increased oocytes yield

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

IVM treatment in patients with low ovarian response. Does it improve IVF outcome or may it cause activation of ovarian follicles and increase the chances of success in the following IVF cycle?

Scientific background:

Poor ovarian response (POR) is one of the major therapeutic challenges in in vitro fertilization. The prevalence of poor responders patients varies in the literature between 9 and 24%, however due to the increase in childbearing age it is expected to be one of the main infertility cause. Failure to respond adequately to standard protocols and to recruit adequate follicles results in decreased oocyte production, cycle cancellation and, overall, it is associated with a significantly diminished probability of pregnancy Several therapeutic approaches for POR have been explored; yet, a single effective strategy has not yet been established. Previously it was shown that mechanical manipulation on ovarian cortex such as ovarian wedge resection or ovarian "drilling" by diathermy or laser, induced follicle growth in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patient.

Recently, a live birth was reported after ovarian cortex fragmentation and in vitro disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway and activation of Akt signaling. The treated ovarian fragments were grafted back to the patient and after follicle growth, retrieval of mature eggs, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer; a healthy baby was delivered. The Hippo signaling pathway is essential to maintain optimal organ size and is conserved in all metazoan animals [6-8]. In this study it was shown that ovarian fragmentation increased actin polymerization and disrupted Hippo signaling by decreasing phosphorylated Yes-associated protein (pYAP) levels together with increased nuclear localization of YAP, leading to increased expression of CCN growth factors genes and BIRC apoptosis inhibitors. Secreted CCN2 and related factors promoted follicle growth

Genes involved in ovarian fragmentation, Hippo signaling, and follicle growth is important for ovarian physiology and pathophysiology. Ovarian fragmentation led to changes in intercellular tension and facilitated the conversion of G-actin to F-actin. Subsequent disruption of Hippo signaling decreased pYAP to total YAP ratios, leading to increased expression of downstream CCN growth factors and BIRC apoptosis inhibitors

In vitro maturation (IVM) has been practiced in a clinical setting for over a decade. It has been suggested as an alternative to conventional IVF for minimizing the risk of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients with the PCOS. Recently, IVM has been proposed as the method for patients undergoing anticancer treatment, particularly for women who require rapid fertility preservation [9] or face the risk of estrogen-sensitive cancer recurrence involve. Although IVM has been applied to IVF poor responders with equivocal results, several researchers have shown benefits in IVM in women who have low ovarian response.

For the purpose of IVM, oocytes are retrieved from ovarian follicles as small as 4-5mm in diameter, under ultrasound guidance with a single-lumen thinner aspiration needle. The aspiration pressure is reduced compared to regular IVF. Therefore, multiple needle punctures are needed because lower aspiration pressures are used and bloody aspirates may block the thin needle lumen. Because immature oocytes are enclosed in tightly packed cumulus cells, curettage of the follicle wall is needed to dislodge the cumulus oocyte complex. All leads to the fact that during IVM procedure increased mechanical stimulation of the ovarian cortex takes place, with the consequent disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway.

Hypothesis and aims Our aim is to investigate whether the mechanical manipulation and triggering of ovarian cortex caused by IVM can cause ovarian follicular activation and recruitment by the mechanisms mentioned above. Thus stimulation in the following regular IVF cycle will result in improved ovarian response and increased oocytes yield.

Materials and Methods Patients Prospective cohort study on POR patients. Twenty five POR patients will be selected based on the bologna criteria and all patients will have at least one documented POR cycle.

IVM protocol POR patients will be treated in IVM cycle according to our IVF unit protocol, using FSH-priming . Briefly, a baseline evaluation that included a hormonal profile and an ultrasound scan was performed on day 3 of the menstrual cycle. On day 3, 150 IU/day recombinant FSH was added for 3 days. A second evaluation was performed on day 6 of the menstrual cycle. An injection of 10,000 IU hCG (Pregnyl; Organon, Oss, Holland) was administered subcutaneously when the endometrial thickness will be ≥6 mm and the leading follicle will be at least 12 mm. Oocyte retrieval will be performed under ultrasound guidance with a 19G single-lumen aspiration needle (Cook; Queensland, Australia) with a reduced aspiration pressure of 7.5 kPa. The follicular fluid will be collected in culture tubes containing follicle flush buffer (Cook) with 2 IU/ml heparin. Because of the difficulty in identifying compacted oocyte complexes, all aspirates were filtered to identify the additional oocytes.

In-Vitro Oocyte Maturation Germinal vesicles and M1 oocytes will be cultured in IVM medium (Sage; CT, USA) supplemented with 75 IU FSH and 75IU luteinizing hormone (LH; Ferring, Keil, Germany) and checked for maturity between 24-48 hours after culture. Mature oocytes were will be denuded of the granulosa cells and fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). After ICSI, the oocytes will be transferred into IVF medium. Fertilization will be assessed 18 hours after ICSI by examining the oocytes for the appearance of two distinct pronuclei (2PN) and the extrusion of two polar bodies.

IVF protocol Following the IVM treatment, if the patient failed to conceive, she will be offered a conventional IVF treatment, using the same controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol, as in her previous IVF treatment (prior to the IVM cycle). Each patient will serve as her own control.

Outcome measurements Outcome measurements will include controlled ovarian hyperstimulation variables, number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes on the day of the aspiration, fertilization rate, embryos quality and number of embryos transferred.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Israel
      • Kiryat Ono, Israel, 5229910
        • Recruiting
        • Sheba Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Poor ovarian response IVF cycle

Exclusion Criteria:

Normal ovarian response

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IVF after IVM

If the patients will not concive during the IVM cycle . results of this following IVF cycle will be compared to the initial IVF preformance

Intervention : In Vitro Maturation Procedure
Other: In Vitro Maturation Procedure
POR patients will be treated in IVM cycle. After baseline evaluation on day 3, 150 IU/day recombinant FSH or HMG will be added for 3 days. A second evaluation will be performed on day 6 of the menstrual cycle. An injection of 10,000 IU hCG (Pregnyl; Organon, Oss, Holland) or Ovitrelle 250mcg (Merck Serono ) will be administered subcutaneously when the endometrial thickness will be ≥6 mm and the leading follicle will be at least 12 mm. Oocyte retrieval will be performed under ultrasound guidance with a 19G single-lumen aspiration needle (Cook; Queensland, Australia). The follicular fluid will be collected in culture tubes containing follicle flush buffer (Cook) with 2 IU/ml heparin. All aspirates were filtered to identify additional oocytes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of oocytes
Time Frame: 3 month
IVF cycle after IVM results will be compared to the IVF cycle with poor ovarian response
3 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sheba Medical Center

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ettie Maman, MD, Sheba Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 15, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SHEBA-14-1604-EM-CTIL

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infertility Female

Clinical Trials on In Vitro Maturation Procedure

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Sweden

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe