Does Sweet Taste Potentiate Nicotine Cue Reactivity? (FNC-nicotine)

March 4, 2020 updated by: Yale University
The investigators' aim is to test the prediction that sweet taste perception enhances the ability of nicotine to induce neural plastic changes in brain reward circuits to increase the saliency, liking and brain reactivity to the sight and vaporized flavor of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Alternative tobacco products are becoming increasingly available in the US market and are promoted as potentially less deleterious compared to cigarettes. These products are increasing in usage as either a substitution for cigarette smoking or in addition to smoking. One particular appeal is that they often combine nicotine with sweet taste and flavors, which are themselves reinforcing. The primary goal of this project is to determine if sweet taste can potentiate the reinforcing properties of nicotine. Similar to nicotine, cues predicting the availability of carbohydrates can stimulate intake, even in the absence of hunger. The investigators have developed a novel flavor-nutrient conditioning paradigm to study the reinforcing properties of carbohydrates. Novel flavors are paired with 0 or 113 kcal carbohydrate and increases in flavor-cue reactivity (change in liking and brain response) when later sampled in the absence of the carbohydrate provide a measure of the reinforcing potency. For smokers, the aroma of tobacco is a potent cue that can promote smoking behavior. Using a modified version of our conditioning paradigm, our specific aim is to test the prediction that sweet taste perception enhances the ability of nicotine to induce neural plastic changes in brain reward circuits to increase the saliency, liking and brain reactivity to the sight and vaporized flavor of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). Participants will smoke e-cigarettes that contain nicotine and an unsweetened vaporized flavor, nicotine and a sweet vaporized flavor or only a sweet vaporized flavor (no nicotine). The investigators predict that response in the nucleus accumbens and hypothalamus to the sight and vaporized flavor of the e-cigarette that was paired with nicotine and sweet taste will be greater than the responses to the sight and vaporized flavors associated with the other e-cigarettes. The investigators further predict that liking and wanting will increase more for the sight and vaporized flavor associated with both nicotine and sweet taste. This finding would provide strong evidence that sweet taste potentiates the reinforcement potency of nicotine and could therefore promote use.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06519
        • The John B Pierce Laboratory

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • right handed
  • non-daily smoker
  • english speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • serious or unstable medical illness (e.g., cancer);
  • past or current history of alcoholism or consistent drug use;
  • current and history of major psychiatric illness as defined by the DSM-IV criteria including eating disorders,
  • medications that affect alertness (e.g., barbiturates, benzodiazepines, chloral hydrate, haloperidol, lithium, carbamazepine, phenytoin, etc.) and any psychoactive drugs or anti-obesity agents;
  • history of major head trauma with loss of consciousness;
  • ongoing pregnancy;
  • known taste or smell dysfunction;
  • a diagnosis of diabetes;
  • any known allergies or sensitivity, including to food, vapors or odors;
  • pregnant or nursing women,
  • history of metalworking, injury with shrapnel or metal slivers, and major surgery;
  • history of pacemaker or neurostimulator implantation m) asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchitis or any other lung disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: flavor and sweetener
E-cigarette with a novel flavor and sweetener added
maltol added as sweetener to e-cigarette with flavor
Experimental: flavor and nicotine
E-cigarette with a novel flavor and 12 mg nicotine added
12 mg of nicotine added to e-cigarette with flavor
Experimental: flavor, nicotine and sweetener
E-cigarette with a novel flavor, sweetener, and 12 mg nicotine added
12 mg nicotine and maltol (sweetener) added to e-cigarette with flavor
Experimental: flavor
E-cigarette with a novel flavor: without a sweetener and 12 mg nicotine added
flavored e-cigarette stand alone without added nicotine and maltol (sweetener)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline on Rating: Liking
Time Frame: 2 days
At baseline and 2 days post exposure, subjects will rate 'liking' using the general Labeled Hedonic Scale (LHS). The LHS is a vertical line scale with quasi-logarithmic spaced, with the label 'most imaginable dislike' in the bottom to 'most imaginable like' in the top, with the label 'neutral' in the middle (recoded to range of -100 to +100).
2 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
percent signal change of nucleus accumbens from fMRI
Time Frame: on average 2 weeks
brain response in nucleus accumbens and hypothalamus (in percent signal
on average 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dana M Small, The John B. Pierce Laboratory

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 16, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on flavor and sweetener

Subscribe