, "Mucosal Injury During Nasotracheal Intubation for Dental Procedures in Children-does the Tube Design Matter?"

January 23, 2024 updated by: Nemours Children's Clinic

"Mucosal Injury During Nasotracheal Intubation for Dental Procedures in Children-does the Tube Design Matter?"

Comparison is made between standard nasotracheal tubes and a specially designed nasotracheal tube during nasotracheal intubation in children undergoing general anesthesia for dental surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Parker flex-tip, midline-beveled nasotracheal tube theoretically slides past obstruction in the nasopharynx causing less mucosal damage than standard nasotracheal tubes.

The investigators aim to test whether mucosal injury during nasotracheal intubation in children undergoing general anesthesia for dental procedures can thus be minimized taking into consideration adenoid size, and differences in nasopharyngeal diameter.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

73

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207
        • Wolfson Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • children between the ages of 3-11, ASA 1-3, presenting to Wolfson Children's Hospital (WCH) for dental procedures requiring general anesthesia with nasotracheal intubation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA >3
  • known bleeding disorders
  • recent or ongoing treatment with blood-thinning medicines
  • frequent epistaxis
  • active URI/congestion/rhinorrhea
  • craniofacial abnormalities prohibiting NTI
  • known difficult airway
  • prior nasal surgery/trauma
  • allergies to any of the medicines used in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: standard nasotracheal tube
Nasotracheal intubation using 'standard' side-beveled nasotracheal tubes
standard nasotracheal tube for nasotracheal intubation assess nasopharynx for severity of bleeding grade adenoid size
Active Comparator: Parker flex-tip nasotracheal tube
Nasotracheal intubation using 'experimental' flex-tip midline-beveled nasotracheal tubes
specially designed nasotracheal tube used for nasotracheal intubation assess nasopharynx for severity of bleeding grade adenoid size

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Epistaxis
Time Frame: within approximately 4hrs of surgery (day of surgery)
Mucosal damage as quantified by presence and severity of bleeding immediately after passage of the NTT through the nasopharynx.
within approximately 4hrs of surgery (day of surgery)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Nasotracheal Tube Impingement
Time Frame: perioperative, immediate during intervention - expected 2hrs (day of surgery)
Presence and degree of severe impingement of the nasotracheal tube during nasotracheal intubation
perioperative, immediate during intervention - expected 2hrs (day of surgery)
Number of Participants With Postoperative Epistaxis
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected average of 6 hours
ongoing nasal bleeding in the recovery unit
Participants will be followed for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected average of 6 hours
Number of Participants With Postoperative Croup
Time Frame: end of surgery until time of discharge, approximately 4hrs
evidence of glottic edema/injury in the immediate postoperative time frame
end of surgery until time of discharge, approximately 4hrs
Time to Discharge in Minutes
Time Frame: emergence from anesthesia to meeting discharge criteria, approximately 4hrs
emergence from anesthesia to meeting discharge criteria, approximately 4hrs

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert B Bryskin, MD, Nemours Children's Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

August 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epistaxis

Clinical Trials on Standard nasotracheal tube

3
Subscribe