Evaluation of Regional Distribution of Ventilation During Labor With or Without Epidural Analgesia

December 5, 2016 updated by: Veerle Van Mossevelde, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Evaluation of Regional Distribution of Ventilation in Spontaneous Breathing Patients During Labor With or Without Epidural Analgesia Using EIT (Electrical Impedance Tomography)

With an efficient epidural analgesia the physiological effects of pain are disabled during labor. Pain may cause an increase of minute volume, oxygen consumption and a decrease of paCO2 (Arterial CO2 pressure). The study will evaluate the lung function before and after labor with and without epidural analgesia. With more efficient breathing, the occurence of atelectasis should be reduced; this effect will be investigated in these settings for the first time with the electrical impedance tomography, which is a completely non-invasive measure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The bedside efficacy of the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in intensive care settings during mechanical ventilation is known. However, no studies demonstrate its utility during epidural analgesia for labor.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate lung function and atelectasis in pregnant women with or without epidural analgesia, during labor and after delivery.

Only adult consenting patients ASA I & ASA II (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) are included in the study. According to institutional protocols lumbal epidural catheter is inserted and tested at the start of the labor, while patients' parameters are monitored.

Refusal to epidural analgesia, technical difficulties to insert the epidural catheter or any medical contraindication will result in inclusion of these patients in the control group.

Measurement with EIT is not invasive and harmful neither for the mother nor for the child.

It consists of putting a belt around the chest; this belt is linked to a monitor which measures the impedance of the different lung regions.

Electrical impedance measurements will be done for short periods of maximum 5 min. each as follows:

  1. Placement before injection of local anesthetics through the epidural catheter in the study goup; in the control subset placement of the belt will be done when an epidural anesthetic would have been considered.
  2. 1 hour after placement of the belt
  3. 1 hour after delivery

These periods will be compared.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Vlaams Brabant
      • Jette, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium, 1090
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I
  • ASA II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Caesarian
  • < 18 years
  • Expulsions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Epidural analgesia Ropivacaine
Placement of an epidural catheter to achieve pain relief
Measurement of regional distribution as assessed by EIT before and after injection of local anesthetics
Measurement of regional distribution as assessed by EIT before and after delivery
Sham Comparator: Absence of epidural analgesia
No placement of an epidural catheter either because of patient refusal or contraindication
Measurement of regional distribution as assessed by EIT before and after injection of local anesthetics
Measurement of regional distribution as assessed by EIT before and after delivery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Better lung function after labor with epidural analgesia
Time Frame: 24h
Using EIT we will map the degree of atelectasis
24h

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maxim Doutreluigne, MD, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
  • Study Chair: Laszlo L Szegedi, Prof., Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 14, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy

Clinical Trials on Epidural analgesia Ropivacaine

Subscribe