Impact of the Persistence of Inflammation at Doppler Ultrasound Level on the Structural Evolution of Erosion in Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biotherapy

Since biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are available in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) strategy an emerging question is the definition of remission in RA. Today some criteria were already proposed and the last one was proposed in 2011.

All these criteria integrated only clinical criteria without imaging assessment. In this context, ultrasound joint is daily performed without definition of remission. A discrepancy exists between clinical remission and persistence of active disease with ultrasound joint presence of a Doppler effect indicating inflammation and the risk of progression of joint damage. A definition of remission in RA could include erosions regression in subchondral bone (at best measured by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT)).

The main hypothesis is that the reduction of erosion size assessed by HR-pQCT will be observed only in the absence of local inflammation measured by Doppler ultrasound in the erosion.

Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) blockers have strongly improved RA therapy outcome in terms of clinical improvement and structural damage (progression of radiographic lesions). Recent data showed that there could be joint bone rebuilt in case of inflammation suppression. HR-pQCT is a new technique emerging for bone erosions assessment in RA. Erosions size and volume could be reduced with anti-TNF, but with a large interindividual variability. There was no correlation between the activity of clinical or ultrasound synovium and evolution of erosion HR-pQCT.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France
        • HCL - Hôpital Edouard Herriot
      • Saint-Etienne, France, 42055
        • CHU Saint-Etienne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Initial medical examination performed,
  • RA diagnosis according to the criteria of the ACR / EULAR 2010
  • Low or moderate disease activity with a DAS28 ≤ 4 since at least for 6 months
  • Patients with bDMARDs (Remicade®, Enbrel®, Humira®, Cimzia®, Simponi®, Ro-Actemra®, ou Orencia®) since at least 6 months and no change planned by the investigator,
  • Patient with at least one erosion on the head of the 2nd or 3rd metacarpal right or left,
  • Stable corticosteroids dose since at least 3 months less than or equal to 10 mg of prednisone equivalent,
  • Medical care and monitoring in the rheumatology department of the CHU of Saint-Etienne or the Edouard Herriot Hospital in Lyon,
  • written consent of patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other diagnosis than RA,
  • Intravenous or intra-articular injection at the 2nd or 3rd metacarpophalangeal left or right during the 3 months prior to inclusion,
  • Surgery provided at the 2nd or 3rd metacarpophalangeal right or left within a year of inclusion,
  • Concomitant treatment with zoledronic acid (Aclasta) or denosumab (Prolia®)
  • Refusal of blood collection,
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding women,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: active erosion
HR-pQCT for measure bone parameters in "active erosion" group. The "active erosion" group will be defined by grades 2 and 3, ie by the presence of Doppler signals confluence in less than 50% of the synovial surface (grade 2) and in over 50% of the surface synovial for grade 3

The Xtrem CT scanco device is a HR-pQCT. It was initially used to measure bone density and quantify the bone architecture to 3D at the extremities of the human body.

For the study, the device will be used to measure changes in erosion at the 2nd or 3rd metacarpal head. Only the patient's hand will be in contact with the medical device, the acquisition time will be 3 minutes.

Other Names:
  • Xtrem CT scanco
Experimental: inactive erosion
HR-pQCT for measure bone parameters in "active erosion" group. The "inactive erosion" group will be defined by grades 0 and 1, ie the absence of Doppler signal for grade 0 and the presence of some non confluence Doppler signals for the grade 1

The Xtrem CT scanco device is a HR-pQCT. It was initially used to measure bone density and quantify the bone architecture to 3D at the extremities of the human body.

For the study, the device will be used to measure changes in erosion at the 2nd or 3rd metacarpal head. Only the patient's hand will be in contact with the medical device, the acquisition time will be 3 minutes.

Other Names:
  • Xtrem CT scanco

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in depth of the erosion
Time Frame: baseline from 1 year
compare the change in the depth of the erosion of the second or third metacarpal head right or left at 12 months between patients with "active erosion" and those with "inactive erosion" in RA patients with low disease activity treated with bDMARD since at least 6 months (Remicade®, Enbrel®, Humira®, Cimzia®, Simponi®, Ro-Actemra®, or Orencia®).
baseline from 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in volume of erosion
Time Frame: baseline from 1 year
compare the change in volume of erosion of the second or third metacarpal head right or left at 12 months between patients with "active erosion" and those with "inactive erosion" in RA patients with low disease activity treated with bDMARD since at least 6 months (Remicade®, Enbrel®, Humira®, Cimzia®, Simponi®, Ro-Actemra®, or Orencia®).
baseline from 1 year
Change in width of erosion
Time Frame: baseline from 1 year
compare the change in width of erosion of the second or third metacarpal head right or left at 12 months between patients with "active erosion" and those with "inactive erosion" in RA patients with low disease activity treated with bDMARD since at least 6 months (Remicade®, Enbrel®, Humira®, Cimzia®, Simponi®, Ro-Actemra®, or Orencia®).
baseline from 1 year
Change in density parameter of bone microarchitecture
Time Frame: baseline from 1 year
compare the change in density parameter of bone microarchitecture of erosion of the second or third metacarpal head right or left at 12 months between patients with "active erosion" and those with "inactive erosion" in RA patients with low disease activity treated with bDMARD since at least 6 months (Remicade®, Enbrel®, Humira®, Cimzia®, Simponi®, Ro-Actemra®, or Orencia®). Density parameter of bone microarchitecture is a composite outcome : Total mineral volumetric density (mg/ccm HA), Trabéculaire mineral volumetric density (mg/ccm HA), Cortical mineral volumetric density (mg/ccm HA), Trabecular Number (1/mm), Trabecular thickness (mm), Trabecular Separation (mm), Mean distance between trabeculae (mm), Presence of new erosions and volume
baseline from 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hubert MAROTTE, PhD, CHU Saint-Etienne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 29, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 29, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 21, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on HR-pQCT

Subscribe