Neurocognitive Effectiveness in Treatment of First-episode Non-affective Psychosis: 1-year Follow-up (PAFIP2_nc1Y)

March 13, 2017 updated by: Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Fundación Marques de Valdecilla

Neurocognitive Effectiveness in Treatment of First-episode Non-affective Psychosis: a Randomized Comparison of Aripiprazole, Quetiapine and Ziprasidone Over 1 Year

Cognitive enhancement is a primary goal in treating individuals with schizophrenia. Cognitive deficits are already present at the first break of the illness, seem to remain stable during early phases and noticeably influence daily functioning. Differences among antipsychotics in terms of cognitive effectiveness have turned out to be a topic of increasing research interest. The initially postulated superior neurocognitive effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) compared to first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) is currently under debate. Long-term studies would be of great value to evaluate the differential benefits exerted by antipsychotic drugs on cognitive performance. The aim of this study is to investigate the cognitive effects of aripiprazole, quetiapine and ziprasidone in first-episode psychosis at 1 year.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study setting and financial support: data for the present investigation were obtained from an ongoing epidemiological and three-year longitudinal intervention program of first-episode psychosis (PAFIP) conducted at the outpatient clinic and the inpatient unit at the University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Spain. Conforming to international standards for research ethics, this program was approved by the local institutional review board. Patients meeting inclusion criteria and their families provided written informed consent to be included in the PAFIP. The Mental Health Services of Cantabria provided funding for implementing the program. No pharmaceutical company supplied any financial support.

Study design: this is a prospective, randomized, flexible-dose, open-label study. Investigators used a simple randomization procedure: a computer-generated randomization list was drawn up by a statistician. Dose ranges were 5-30 mg/day Aripiprazole, 40-160 mg/day Ziprasidone and 100-600 mg/day Quetiapine. Rapid titration schedule (5-day), until optimal dose was reached, was as a rule used unless severe side effects occur. At the treating physician's discretion, the dose and type of antipsychotic medication could be changed based on clinical efficacy and the profile of side effects during the follow-up period. Antimuscarinic medication, Lormetazepam and Clonazepam were permitted for clinical reasons. No antimuscarinic agents were administered prophylactically. Antidepressants (Sertraline) and mood stabilizers (lithium) were permitted if clinically needed.

Clinical assessment: the severity scale of the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scale for the Assessment of Positive symptoms (SAPS), the Scale for the Assessment of Negative symptoms (SANS), the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) were used to evaluate symptomatology. To assess general adverse event experiences, the Scale of the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU), the Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) and the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) were used. The same trained psychiatrist (BC-F) completed all clinical assessments. These clinical data are described at AZQ2005 study.

Neuropsychological assessment. Cognitive functioning was assessed in patients at 2 points: baseline and 1 year after the initialization of antipsychotic treatment. The cognitive assessment at baseline was carried out at 12 weeks after recruitment because this time is considered optimal for patients' stabilization. The evaluation required approximately 2 h and was carried out in the same day by the same neuropsychologist (R.A.-A and E.G.-R). The neuropsychological battery comprises 9 cognitive domains: information processing speed, motor dexterity, working memory, verbal learning, visuospatial abilities, delayed memory, attention, executive function and theory of mind.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

136

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cantabria
      • Santander, Cantabria, Spain, 39008
        • University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients followed in the First Episode Psychosis Clinical Program (PAFIP II) from October 2005 to January 2011.
  • Experiencing their first episode of psychosis (First Episode of Psychosis is defined as that psychopathological state in which for the first time and regardless of its duration, the patient has enough severe psychotic symptoms to allow a diagnosis of psychosis, having received no specific psychiatric treatment for him).
  • Living in the catchment area (Cantabria).
  • No prior treatment with antipsychotic medication or, if previously treated, a total life time of adequate antipsychotic treatment of less than 6 weeks.
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for brief psychotic disorder, schizophreniform disorder, schizophrenia, or schizoaffective disorder.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Meeting DSM-IV criteria for drug dependence.
  • Meeting DSM-IV criteria for mental retardation.
  • Having a history of neurological disease or head injury with loss of consciousness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Aripiprazole & cognitive battery
Aripiprazole 5-30 mg/day. Cognitive battery at baseline and at 1 year.
Oral, dose range 5-30 mg/day, once or twice a day, during study duration
Other Names:
  • Abilify
Completed in the following standardized sequence: 1-the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT); 2-WAIS-III digit symbol subtest; 3-Grooved Pegboard Test; 4-The Zoo Map Test; 5-Tower of London Test (ToL); 6-Rey Complex Figure (RCF); 7-Trail Making Test (TMT); 8-WAIS-III digits forward and backward subtests; 9-WAIS-III letter-number sequencing subtest; 10-WAIS-III vocabulary subtest that was used as measure of premorbid intelligence quotient (IQ); 11-Stroop Test; 12-letter (FAS) and semantic (animal) fluency tests; 14-Eyes Task; 15-Continuous Performance Test (CPT).
Active Comparator: Quetiapine & cognitive battery
Quetiapine 100-600 mg/day. Cognitive battery at baseline and at 1 year.
Completed in the following standardized sequence: 1-the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT); 2-WAIS-III digit symbol subtest; 3-Grooved Pegboard Test; 4-The Zoo Map Test; 5-Tower of London Test (ToL); 6-Rey Complex Figure (RCF); 7-Trail Making Test (TMT); 8-WAIS-III digits forward and backward subtests; 9-WAIS-III letter-number sequencing subtest; 10-WAIS-III vocabulary subtest that was used as measure of premorbid intelligence quotient (IQ); 11-Stroop Test; 12-letter (FAS) and semantic (animal) fluency tests; 14-Eyes Task; 15-Continuous Performance Test (CPT).
Oral, dose range 100-600 mg/day, once or twice a day, during study duration
Other Names:
  • Seroquel
Active Comparator: Ziprasidone & cognitive battery
Ziprasidone 40-160 mg/day. Cognitive battery at baseline and at 1 year.
Completed in the following standardized sequence: 1-the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT); 2-WAIS-III digit symbol subtest; 3-Grooved Pegboard Test; 4-The Zoo Map Test; 5-Tower of London Test (ToL); 6-Rey Complex Figure (RCF); 7-Trail Making Test (TMT); 8-WAIS-III digits forward and backward subtests; 9-WAIS-III letter-number sequencing subtest; 10-WAIS-III vocabulary subtest that was used as measure of premorbid intelligence quotient (IQ); 11-Stroop Test; 12-letter (FAS) and semantic (animal) fluency tests; 14-Eyes Task; 15-Continuous Performance Test (CPT).
Oral, dose range 40-160 mg/day, once or twice a day, during study duration
Other Names:
  • Zeldox

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global cognitive index
Time Frame: 1 year
In order to calculate a measure of Global Cognitive Functioning (GCF) raw cognitive scores were reversed when appropriate before standardization so they all have the same direction (the higher, the better). According to previous methodology, the GCF was calculated as T-scores, with raw scores of a healthy comparison sample. T scores were converted to deficit scores that reflect presence and severity of cognitive impairment. Deficit scores on all tests were then "averaged" to create the GCF score.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in information processing speed
Time Frame: 1 year
Measured by Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) - III digit symbol subtest (standard total score), Trail Making Test (TMT) trail A and Continuous Performance Test (CPT) reaction time.
1 year
Change in motor dexterity
Time Frame: 1 year
Measured by Grooved Pegboard Test (time to complete with dominant hand).
1 year
Change in working memory
Time Frame: 1 year
Measured by WAIS - III letter-number sequencing test (standard total score) and WAIS - III digits forward (standard total score).
1 year
Change in verbal learning
Time Frame: 1 year
Measured by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) (trials 1-5).
1 year
Change in visuospatial abilities
Time Frame: 1 year
Measured by the Rey Complex Figure (RCF) (copy figure).
1 year
Change in delayed memory
Time Frame: 1 year
Measured by RAVLT (list recall and list recognition discrimination subscore) and RCF (delayed recall).
1 year
Change in attention
Time Frame: 1 year
Measured by CPT (discrimination subscores).
1 year
Change in executive function
Time Frame: 1 year
Measured by TMT trail B, Stroop Test (color-word), the Zoo Map Test (first and second conditions), the Tower of London Test (ToL) (total correct and total moves score) and letter (FAS) and semantic (animal) fluency tests.
1 year
Change in theory of mind
Time Frame: 1 year
Measured by Eyes Task (total correct score).
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Professor, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria, CIBERSAM Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red Salud Mental, Santander, Spain.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychotic Disorders

Clinical Trials on Aripiprazole

3
Subscribe