the Safety and Efficacy of Collagen Injection in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis

September 1, 2015 updated by: Sewon Cellontech Co., Ltd.

A Post-marketing Surveillance to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Collagen Injection in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of collagen injection in patients with plantar fasciitis

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is an open-trial study. Sixty subjects will be participated in it. The study will be explained to the subjects and they voluntarily agreed to participate in it. Their eligibility to participate in the study will be checked, and the patient will receive collagen or a placebo (normal saline) in the plantar facia through randomization. They will be asked to follow the guidelines of the investigators during the study and to visit the hospital seven times, including for screening and the date of re-injection. . At each visit, the subjects undergo a VAS, a clinical laboratory tests, and a physical exam to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Regenseal. (*Re-injection could be maximum 2times at visit2 and 3, one week apart based on the investigator's judgment after the initial injection. If the subject gets injection on the screening date, the total number of his or her visits will be six.)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Hyun Jo Kim, Bachelor
  • Phone Number: 82-2-460-3237
  • Email: angel@swcell.com

Study Locations

      • Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Daejeon Sun hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jun Bum Kim, MD
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Eulji General Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jin Soo Kim, MD
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jae Ho Cho, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- 1. Patient with chronic plantar fasciitis (Patients who had been diagnosed with plantar fasciitis but had not been responsive to non-invasive treatment for more than three months (non-invasive treatments include drugs, physiotherapy shock wave, or stretching) 2. Patients who are able to complete the questionnaires related to the safety and efficacy of the study drug and who read and understood the guidelines 3. Patients who agreed to maintain the medication dose during the study period if they need to keep taking it. (Excluded anti-inflammatory analgesic drug for pain after the injection.) 4. Patients who agreed not to use physical therapy or shock wave during the study period.

5. Patients or their representative (for adults), or patients and their parent/guardian (for minors), who agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. If patients or their families suffer from or have ever suffered from an autoimmune disease.

    2. Patients who have ever suffered an anaphylactic reaction. 3. Patients who have ever suffered hypersensitivity to an implant. 4. Patients with a history of allergy to porcine or bovine protein. 5. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis. 6. Patients with ankylosing spondylitis. 7. Patients who are suspected of having spinal deformity with a negative serum test 8. Subjects who are pregnant and/or breast-feeding and/or plan a pregnancy. 9. Subjects with psychiatric disorders who are considered inappropriate to participate in this trial by the Principal Investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: placebo injection
placebo, normal saline, injection in the plantar facia through randomization
placebo, normal saline, injection in the defect area
Experimental: Regenseal injection
Regenseal, collagen, injection in the plantar facia through randomization
Regenseal, collagen, injection in the defect area

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference in the 100mmVAS score
Time Frame: 3 months after the surgery
The difference in the 100mmVAS between study group and control group at 3 months after the surgery will be compared and analyzed
3 months after the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference in the 100mmVAS score
Time Frame: baseline and 6, 12 months after the surgery
The difference in the 100mmVAS between study group and control group at baseline and 6, 12 months after the surgery will be compared and analyzed.
baseline and 6, 12 months after the surgery
change of the thickness in the sonographic evaluation and fluid collection
Time Frame: baseline and 3, 6, 12 months after the surgery
The difference between study group and control group of the thickness in the sonographic evaluation and fluid collection at baseline will be compared with that three months after the surgery. The thickness in the sonographic evaluation and fluid collection six and 12 months will be additionally taken for comparison and analysis.
baseline and 3, 6, 12 months after the surgery
change of Satisfaction evaluation by physician in charge
Time Frame: baseline and 3, 6, 12 months after the surgery
The improvements on the affected ankle by physician in charge at 3 months after injection and six, 12months after injection of the study and control group will be compared and analyzed. (Physician in charge evaluates the degree of improvement in 5 levels, such as 'excellent, good, satisfactory, no change, and worsened.)
baseline and 3, 6, 12 months after the surgery
change of Satisfaction evaluation by patients
Time Frame: baseline and 3, 6, 12 months after the surgery
The improvements on the affected ankle at 3 months after injection and six, 12 months after injection of the study and control group will be compared and analyzed. (Patient evaluates the degree of improvement in 5 levels, such as 'excellent, good, satisfactory, no change, and worsened.)
baseline and 3, 6, 12 months after the surgery
change score of Degree of recovery
Time Frame: baseline and 3, 6, 12 months after the surgery
The score of degree of recovery at baseline will be recorded. The difference between study group and control group in the score of degree of recovery at three, six, and 12months after injection will be compared and analyzed.
baseline and 3, 6, 12 months after the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jin Soo Kim, MD, Eulji General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Jae Ho Cho, MD, Inje University
  • Principal Investigator: Jun Bum Kim, MD, Daejeon Sun hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 2, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 01RGS

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Plantar Fasciitis

Clinical Trials on normal saline

3
Subscribe