- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02545218
Perineorraphy Versus Pelvic Floor Exercise - a Randomized Trial
August 22, 2018 updated by: Marion Ek, Stockholm South General Hospital
The perineal body is commonly injured during labor.
It is possible to perform a secondary repair, a perineorraphy, which aims to reduce the symptomatology after an improperly healed perineal tear.
The aim of the randomized trial is to evaluate the results of such an operation compared with conservative treatment.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A randomized controlled trial which aims to evaluate objective and subjective outcomes following perineorraphy compared with pelvic floor exercise after vaginal delivery.
70 women seeking help for improperly healed perineal tear following vaginal delivery, matching our inclusion- and exclusion criteria, will be randomised into two different treatment groups, 35 to operative treatment, perineorraphy, and 35 to conservative treatment, tutored pelvic floor exercise.
Assessment pre-and 6 months postoperatively will include clinical evaluation and condition specific validated questionnaires.
Surgical characteristics and adverse events during follow-up are also registered.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
70
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Stockholm, Sweden, 11861
- Sodersjukhuset
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- women with 2nd or 3rd degree laceration during vaginal delivery seeking for help because of troublesome symptoms from the pelvic floor
- height of perineum 2 cm or less.
- A least 6 months post partum
- stopped "exclusive breastfeeding"
- no indication for other gynecological surgical procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
- history of 4th degree laceration
- connective tissue disorder (Systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögrens syndrome, Polymyalgia rheumatica, Marfans syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome)
- current use of systemic corticosteroids
- diabetes mellitus
- suspect occult sphincter tear on ultrasound
- history of previous urogynecological operation
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Perineorraphy.
Secondary surgical repair of the perineal body.
Operation is performed by a urogynecologist in an operation theater in local anesthesia.
The operation aims to re-create the anatomy in the injured perineum using 2-4 sutures.
|
Surgery for improperly healed perineal tear
|
|
Active Comparator: Pelvic floor exercise.
Tutored pelvic floor exercise.
A trained physio therapist evaluate the pelvic floor musculature and helps the patient to perform proper pelvic floor exercises using biofeedback.
The patient receives a training scheme and meets the therapist regularly every second week during 4 months.
|
Pelvic floor exercise tutored by physio therapist.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-1)
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
Patients own assessment of improvement 6 months after intervention using a seven grade assessment tool called PGI-1
|
6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
POP-Q (Pelvic organ Quantification System)
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
Pelvic organ prolapse is graded via the Pelvic organ Quantification System (POP-Q) into stage 0-4.
It is a validated way to clinically assess and stage of the female pelvic floor.
|
6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
|
Ultrasound of perineum
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
Height and depth of perineum i millimeters using ultrasonography
|
6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
|
Pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI 20)
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
20 validated questions concerning prolapse related symptoms
|
6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
|
Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PIFQ-7)
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
Evaluates the effect on quality of lafe.
|
6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
|
Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ)
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
Evaluate effects on sexual functions
|
6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD)
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
Evaluate psychological effects
|
6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
|
Vaginal symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
Three non-validated questions concerning vaginal symptoms; sensation of wideness, vaginal flatulence and excessive discharge.
|
6 months after intervention (operation or start of pelvic floor training)
|
|
Surgical complications
Time Frame: From surgery up to 6 months postoperatively
|
Infections.Bleedings.
Other complications.
|
From surgery up to 6 months postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marion Ek, M.D., Ph.D., Stockholm South General Hospital
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Woodman PJ, Graney DO. Anatomy and physiology of the female perineal body with relevance to obstetrical injury and repair. Clin Anat. 2002 Aug;15(5):321-34. doi: 10.1002/ca.10034.
- Harvey MA. Pelvic floor exercises during and after pregnancy: a systematic review of their role in preventing pelvic floor dysfunction. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003 Jun;25(6):487-98. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30310-3.
- Bergman I, Westergren Soderberg M, Ek M. Perineorrhaphy Compared With Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy in Women With Late Consequences of a Poorly Healed Second-Degree Perineal Tear: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):341-351. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003653.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2018
Study Completion (Anticipated)
June 1, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 7, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 7, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
September 9, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 24, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 22, 2018
Last Verified
August 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- StockholmSGH
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Perineal Tear Resulting From Childbirth
-
Nishtar Medical UniversityCompletedVaginal Delivery | Perineal Tear Resulting From ChildbirthPakistan
-
Universidade do PortoCompletedPerineal Tear Resulting From ChildbirthPortugal
-
University of Sao PauloRecruitingEpisiotomy | Perineal Injury | Perineal Pain | Perineal Tear Resulting From Childbirth | Lacerations Perineal | Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury | Perineal Tear and Episiotomy | Perineal Laceration, Tear, or Rupture During DeliveryBrazil
-
University of CalgaryAlberta Health services; Alberta Innovates Health SolutionsCompletedScar Tissue | Perineal Tear | Episiotomy; Complications | Vaginal Tear Resulting From ChildbirthCanada
-
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustSuspendedPerineal Tear and Episiotomy | Perineal Laceration, Tear, or Rupture During DeliveryUnited Kingdom
-
Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselCompletedSupervision of Pregnancy Resulting From In-vitro FertilizationBelgium
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Military CommandUnknownSupervision of Pregnancy Resulting From In-vitro FertilizationChina
-
University of ZurichCompletedPerineal Tear | Vaginal TearSwitzerland
-
Clinical Research Centre, MalaysiaCompletedPerineal Tear | Perineal Laceration (Obstetric)
-
Helsingborgs HospitalSkane University Hospital; Lund University HospitalCompleted