Influenza Immunity in Children

August 5, 2021 updated by: Jennifer Nayak, University of Rochester

Understanding How the Initial Encounter With Influenza Virus Poises Children for Protective Immunity

This study evaluates how different methods of early exposure to influenza (natural infection, live attenuated influenza vaccination, inactivated influenza vaccination) initially stimulate immunity and poise the immune system to respond to a future challenge with the inactivated influenza vaccine.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed research addresses the fact that, despite high childhood morbidity from influenza and broad recommendations for vaccination, very little is known about how anti-influenza immunity is shaped by the method of initial exposure. The objective of this research is to understand how CD4 T cell and B cell responses are altered by the method of initial influenza priming, with the long-term goal of determining how a child's initial influenza encounter poises the immune system to respond to subsequent influenza challenges. The investigators central hypothesis is that differences in the mode of influenza antigen exposure in early childhood will generate long lasting, detectable changes in memory CD4 T cell and B cell specificity and function that influence the response to future influenza vaccinations and infections. This hypothesis will be tested by comparing 1) CD4 T cell and 2) antibody responses in cohorts of children initially exposed to influenza through either natural infection or inactivated or live attenuated vaccination. A combination of multiparameter assays will be used to determine the phenotype and functional potential of hemagglutinin (HA)- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells. The breadth and avidity of the neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibody responses and its distribution against head and stalk epitopes will also be evaluated. By determining how initial priming shapes the specificity and functional potential of the anti-influenza CD4 T cell and antibody responses, the investigators will gain the knowledge necessary to optimize current influenza vaccination strategies and develop novel influenza vaccines able to provide highly efficacious universal protection against both seasonal and potentially pandemic viral strains.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

134

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • University of Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 months to 8 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age

    • Between 6 and 12 months to participate in the vaccination arm of cohort 1 (cohort 1A)
    • Between 3 and 12 months to participate in the natural infection arm of cohort 1 (cohort 1B)
    • Between 13 and 35 months of age to participate in either the vaccination or natural infection arm of cohort 2
    • Between 36 months and 5 years of age to participate in either the vaccination or natural infection arm of cohort 3
    • Between 6 years and 8 years of age to participate in either the vaccination or natural infection arm of cohort 4
  • Gestational age of ≥37 weeks at birth
  • Parent/guardian can provide informed consent
  • Available for the duration of the study
  • History of previous IIV administration ONLY for participation in the vaccination arm of cohorts 2, 3, or 4
  • Acute illness documented to be due to influenza virus ONLY for participation in the natural infection arms of cohorts 1-4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Immunosuppression as a result of an underlying illness or condition (including HIV or a primary immunodeficiency syndrome)
  • Active neoplastic disease
  • Use of potentially immunosuppressive medications currently or within the past year (including chemotherapeutic agents) or chronic (>2 weeks) use of oral or inhaled steroid therapy
  • A diagnosis of asthma requiring chronic controller medication
  • Previous administration of influenza vaccine in the current influenza season ONLY for subjects receiving an influenza vaccination
  • Receipt of immunoglobulin or another blood product within the year prior to study enrollment
  • An acute illness within the previous 3 days or temperature >38o on screening EXCEPT for participation in the natural infection arms of cohorts 1-4
  • A contraindication to influenza vaccination EXCEPT infants between 3 and 5 months presenting with natural influenza infection whose only contraindication is their current age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 6-12 months Seasonal IIV
Children 6 - 12 months of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV
Fluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) 0.25 mL administered intramuscularly to children between 6 and 35 months of age
Other Names:
  • Inactivated influenza vaccine
Experimental: 3-12 months natural infection
Children 3-12 months of age presenting with natural influenza infection
Children enrolled on presentation to their primary care provider with a natural influenza infection
Fluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) 0.25 mL administered intramuscularly to children between 6 and 35 months of age
Other Names:
  • inactivated influenza vaccine
Experimental: 13-35 months Seasonal IIV
Children 13-35 months of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV
Fluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) 0.25 mL administered intramuscularly to children between 6 and 35 months of age
Other Names:
  • Inactivated influenza vaccine
Experimental: 13-35 months natural infection
Children 13-35 months of age presenting with natural influenza infection
Children enrolled on presentation to their primary care provider with a natural influenza infection
Fluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) 0.25 mL administered intramuscularly to children between 6 and 35 months of age
Other Names:
  • inactivated influenza vaccine
Experimental: 3-5 years Seasonal IIV
Children 3-5 years of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV
Fluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) 0.25 mL administered intramuscularly to children between 6 and 35 months of age
Other Names:
  • inactivated influenza vaccine
Experimental: 3-5 years natural infection
Children 3-5 years of age presenting with natural influenza infection
Children enrolled on presentation to their primary care provider with a natural influenza infection
Fluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) 0.25 mL administered intramuscularly to children between 6 and 35 months of age
Other Names:
  • inactivated influenza vaccine
Experimental: 6-8 years Seasonal IIV
Children 6-8 years of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV
Fluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) 0.25 mL administered intramuscularly to children between 6 and 35 months of age
Other Names:
  • inactivated influenza vaccine
Experimental: 6-8 years natural infection
Children 6-8 years of age presenting with natural influenza infection
Children enrolled on presentation to their primary care provider with a natural influenza infection
Fluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) 0.25 mL administered intramuscularly to children between 6 and 35 months of age
Other Names:
  • inactivated influenza vaccine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
Time Frame: Visit 2 (day 8-14 post enrollment)
% H3- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
Visit 2 (day 8-14 post enrollment)
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
Time Frame: Visit 3 (day 20-28 post enrollment)
% H3- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
Visit 3 (day 20-28 post enrollment)
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
Time Frame: Visit 4 (day of vaccination year 2)
% H3- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
Visit 4 (day of vaccination year 2)
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
Time Frame: Visit 5 (day 8-14 post-vaccination year 2)
% H3 protein- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
Visit 5 (day 8-14 post-vaccination year 2)
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
Time Frame: Visit 6 (day 20-28 post-vaccination year 2)
% H3 Protein- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
Visit 6 (day 20-28 post-vaccination year 2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change in Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Vaccinated Subjects in Different Age Subsets
Time Frame: Baseline to day 24 study year 1
CD4 T cell quantity and specificity will be measured using intracellular cytokine staining. We report here the mean change in percent of cells reactive to the influenza HA protein and H3 protein.
Baseline to day 24 study year 1
Mean Change in Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Vaccinated Subjects in Different Age Subsets
Time Frame: Baseline to day 24 study year 2
CD4 T cell quantity and specificity will be measured using intracellular cytokine staining. We report here the mean change in percent of cells reactive to the influenza HA protein and H3 protein.
Baseline to day 24 study year 2

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Day 10 and Day 24 in PBMC Gene Expression
Time Frame: Days 10 and 24 post vaccination
Changes in PBMC gene expression patterns due to prior influenza exposure will be assessed using RNA-seq analysis
Days 10 and 24 post vaccination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer L Nayak, MD, University of Rochester

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 3, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 3, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Influenza

Clinical Trials on Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL dose

Subscribe