Driving Neuroplasticity With Nerve Stimulation and Modified CIT

September 8, 2023 updated by: Lumy Sawaki, University of Kentucky

Driving Neuroplasticity With Nerve Stimulation and Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy

The investigators proposed to evaluate the effectiveness of sustained peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) to enhance the therapeutic effects of a modified form CIT (mCIT).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Stroke is one the most devastating and prevalent diseases, but efforts to limit the amount of tissue damaged in the acute phase have been disappointing, highlighting the need for effective therapeutic interventions after neurologic damage has occurred. A major goal of the research in stroke rehabilitation is to harness the capacity of the brain to reorganize after neurologic damage has occurred and thus ultimately lead to successful recovery of function. Data from animal and human models have suggested that sensory input plays an important role in motor output, possibly by influencing cortical plasticity. However, in spite of the advances to date, little is known about the extent to which sensory input in the form of peripheral nerve stimulation can be successfully combined to physical training. A new emerging approach called constraint-induced therapy (CIT) is an intensive functional motor training and has produced promising results in the field of stroke rehabilitation. CIT involves restraining the unaffected arm with a sling or glove combined with intense task-oriented therapy of the affected side for six hours daily during 2 weeks. This pilot study will evaluate the effectiveness of sustained peripheral nerve stimulation coupled with functional motor training to improve hand motor function. While the functional motor training follows identical principles of CIT, the length of daily training will be shortened to 4 hours daily and thus the investigators will refer in this proposal as a modified CIT. Preliminary data for this study demonstrated that peripheral nerve stimulation results in increased cortical motor excitability in normal subjects. In addition, learning and use-dependent plasticity can be substantially enhanced by a single session of 2 hours of peripheral nerve stimulation in chronic stroke patients. The goal of this study is to test the hypothesis that stroke patients treated with upper extremity peripheral nerve stimulation preceding CIT (intervention group) will have improved hand motor function compared to a group receiving lower extremity peripheral nerve stimulation and CIT (control group).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic stroke patients
  • Single stroke
  • Chronic (more than 12 months after from stroke)
  • At least 21 years old, but there is no upper age range for this project.
  • Participants must be able to extend the affected metacarpophalangeal joints at least 10° and the wrist 20°.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of carpal tunnel syndrome and conditions that commonly cause peripheral neuropathy, including diabetes, uremia, or associated nutritional deficiencies
  • History of head injury with loss of consciousness, severe alcohol or drug abuse, psychiatric illness
  • Within 3 months of recruitment, use of drugs known to exert detrimental effects on motor recovery
  • Cognitive deficit severe enough to preclude informed consent
  • Positive pregnancy test or being of childbearing age and not using appropriate contraception
  • Participants with history of untreated depression.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active
2 hours of active peripheral nerve stimulation paired with 4 hours of intensive task-oriented upper extremity training
Non-invasive stimulation of median, ulnar and radial nerves
Sham Comparator: Sham PNS
2 hours of sham peripheral nerve stimulation paired with 4 hours of intensive task-oriented upper extremity training
Non-invasive stimulation of median, ulnar and radial nerves

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Timed Portion
Time Frame: baseline, post-intervention, 1-month follow-up
Score at post-intervention minus score at baseline, score at 1-month follow-up minus score at baseline
baseline, post-intervention, 1-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Fugl Meyer Assessment Motor Score
Time Frame: baseline, post-intervention, 1-month follow-up
Score at post-intervention minus score at baseline, score at 1-month follow-up minus score at baseline. The scores can range from 0 to 66, with higher scores indicating better performance. The scores are calculated by summing the scores to the 33 individual tasks.
baseline, post-intervention, 1-month follow-up
Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time Frame: baseline, post-intervention, 1-month follow-up

Values given are score at post-intervention minus score at baseline, score at 1-month follow-up minus score at baseline.

The ARAT's is a 19 item measure divided into 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement).

Performance on each item is rated on a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from:

3: Performs test normally 2: Completes test, but takes abnormally long or has great difficulty

1: Performs test partially 0: Can perform no part of test The maximum score on the ARTS is 57 points (possible range 0 to 57).

baseline, post-intervention, 1-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

October 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on peripheral nerve stimulation

Subscribe