Suprasacral Parallel Shift - Ultrasound/MR Image Fusion Guided Lumbosacral Plexus Block

February 11, 2016 updated by: Thomas F. Bendtsen
The main objective of the trial is to complete a double-blinded randomized controlled trial with crossover design of a lumbosacral plexus block with the Suprasacral Parallel Shift technique guided by ultrasound/magnetic resonance (MR) image fusion vs. Suprasacral Parallel Shift guided by ultrasound by estimating sensory block of the femoral nerve, the obturator nerve, the lumbosacral trunk, and spinal nerve L1 in healthy volunteers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main objective of the trial is to complete a double-blinded randomized controlled trial with crossover design of a one-injection nerve block of the lower part of the lumbar plexus and the upper part of the sacral plexus (Suprasacral Parallel Shift, SSPS) to achieve analgesia of the femoral nerve, the obturator nerve, the lumbosacral trunk, and spinal nerve L1 with SSPS guided by ultrasound/MR image fusion vs. SSPS guided by ultrasound by estimating sensory block of in healthy volunteers by estimating the sensory block of dermatomes of the terminal nerves in healthy volunteers.

The secondary objective is to estimate a) preparation and b) procedure time, c) injection site and d) depth, e) discomfort, f) change in MAP, g) plasma lidocaine pharmacokinetics, h) motor and i) sensory block, j) perineural and k) epidural spread of lidocaine-epinephrine added gadotorate meglumine on MRI, and l) cost-effectiveness of SSPS guided by ultrasound/MR image fusion vs. SSPS guided by ultrasound.

The investigators hypothesize that block success is higher for SSPS guided by ultrasound/MR image fusion than for SSPS guided by ultrasound.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus C, Denmark, 8000
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Volunteers who has given their written and oral informed consent to participate in the study after having fully understood the content and the limitations of the protocol.
  • Normal healthy person (American Society of Anesthesiology [ASA] Classification I)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteers not able to cooperate in the study
  • Volunteers not able to understand or speak Danish
  • Daily use of analgesics
  • Allergy against the medicines used in the study
  • Drug abuse (according to the investigator's judgement)
  • Alcohol consumption greater than the recommendations of the Danish National Board of Health
  • Contraindication for MRI including pregnancy
  • Volunteer in whom nerve blocks are not possible due to technical reasons
  • Volunteer who are incompetent (ie. surrogate consent is not accepted)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Suprasacral Parallel Shift guided by US/MR image fusion
Use of ultrasound/MR image fusion guided Suprasacral Parallel Shift technique to place a lumbar plexus block (20 mL 2% lidocaine with epinephrine added gadoterate meglumine).
Active Comparator: Suprasacral Parallel Shift guided by US
Use of ultrasound guided Suprasacral Parallel Shift technique to place a lumbar plexus block (20 mL 2% lidocaine with epinephrine added gadoterate meglumine).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Block success
Time Frame: Estimated 40 min after completed intervention. Presented 10 months after last patient last visit (LVLP).
Block success of the clinical relevant lumbosacral nerves that innervate the hip joint capsule estimated as significant motor block of the obturator nerve, the femoral nerve, and the lumbosacral trunk. Motor block is a significant proxy marker of sensory block. Motor block (muscle strength, mmHg) is assessed with a handheld dynamometer.
Estimated 40 min after completed intervention. Presented 10 months after last patient last visit (LVLP).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plasma lidocaine
Time Frame: Blood samples are withdrawn 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 90 minutes after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Blood samples are withdrawn 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 90 minutes after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Time for preparation
Time Frame: Estimated prior to intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Time for preparation in seconds is defined as the time of placement of the volunteer on the bed until the end of pre-ultrasound scanning
Estimated prior to intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Block procedure time
Time Frame: Estimated during intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Block procedure time in seconds is defined as the time of the placement of the ultrasound probe on the skin to until the block needle is pulled out after injection of local anesthetics
Estimated during intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Injection site
Time Frame: Estimated at the end of the intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Estimated at the end of the intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Block needle depth
Time Frame: Estimated at the end of the intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Estimated at the end of the intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Discomfort
Time Frame: Estimated immediately after the intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Estimated on numeric rating scale 0-10
Estimated immediately after the intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Mean arterial pressure change
Time Frame: Mean arterial pressure is measured prior intervention and 5 min after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Mean arterial pressure is measured prior intervention and 5 min after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Sensory (cold, warm, touch, pain) block of the dermatomes T12-S3 and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve
Time Frame: Estimated 50 min after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Estimated 50 min after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Perineural spread of local anesthetics added gadoterate meglumine
Time Frame: Estimated on MRI sampled 10-30 minutes after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Estimated on MRI sampled 10-30 minutes after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Epidural spread of local anesthetics added gadoterate meglumine
Time Frame: Estimated on MRI sampled 10-30 minutes after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Estimated on MRI sampled 10-30 minutes after intervention. Presented 10 months after LVLP
Cost-effectiveness (ICER)
Time Frame: Calculated after LVLP. Presented 10 months after the last visit of the last volunteer
ICER is estimated as the difference in mean marginal cost of the blocks.
Calculated after LVLP. Presented 10 months after the last visit of the last volunteer

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 12, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Fractures

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine-epinephrine added gadoterate meglumine

3
Subscribe