Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy Study of RGN-259 Ophthalmic Solutions for Neurotrophic Keratopathy : SEER-1

August 16, 2023 updated by: ReGenTree, LLC

Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double Masked, Placebo Controlled Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of RGN-259 Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Neurotrophic Keratopathy: SEER-1

The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of RGN-259 Ophthalmic Solution compared to placebo for the treatment of NK.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) is a degenerative corneal disease that occurs as a result of partial or total impairment of trigeminal innervation. The resulting loss of corneal sensitivity (anesthesia) leads to a reduction in lacrimation and a decline in status, metabolism, and mitosis of corneal epithelial cells. Previous studies (physician-sponsored studies) used to treat to nine patients with NK, six of whom had discrete geographic, non-healing lesions, and three of whom had punctate lesions and the study result reported.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Lancaster, California, United States, 93534
        • Hull Eye Center
    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80907
        • Vision Institute
      • Fort Collins, Colorado, United States, 80525
        • Eye Center of Northern Colorado
      • Parker, Colorado, United States, 80134
        • Insight Vision Group
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20037
        • Medical Faculty Associates, Inc.
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46290
        • Midwest Cornea Associates, LLC
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40509
        • Koffler Vision Group
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40206
        • The Eye Care Institute
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40205
        • Richard Eiferman, MD, PSC
    • Maine
      • Lewiston, Maine, United States, 04240
        • Central Maine Eye Care
    • South Dakota
      • Rapid City, South Dakota, United States, 57701
        • Black Hills Regional Eye Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be male or female of any race, at least 18 years of age
  • Have provided verbal and written informed consent.
  • Be able and willing to follow instructions, including participation in all study assessments and visits;
  • Have stage 2 or 3 neurotrophic keratopathy in at least one eye If a female of childbearing potential, have a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1 and agree to use an adequate method of birth control throughout the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have any clinically significant slit lamp findings at Visit 1 that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the study parameters;
  • Have significant blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), lid margin inflammation or active ocular allergy that requires treatment
  • Have a lid function abnormality (ex. Lagophthalmos) which, in the opinion of the investigator, is the primary cause of the persistent epithelial defect;
  • Be diagnosed with ongoing ocular infection (bacterial, viral or fungal) or active inflammation (e.g. follicular conjunctivitis) not related to NK
  • Anticipate the use of fluoroquinolone-containing antibiotic eye drops during the study;
  • Have used contact lenses (excluding therapeutic contact lenses) within 14 days prior to Visit 1 or anticipates use of contact lenses during the study period;
  • Have an uncontrolled systemic disease that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the study parameters;
  • Anticipate a change in immunosuppressive therapy during the course of the study;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RGN-259
It is a preservative-free, sterile eye drop solution containing Tβ4
A preservative-free, sterile eye drop solution containing Tβ4 for direct instillation into affected eye(s), five times a day for 4 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Tβ4
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
It is composed of the same excipients as RGN-259 but does not contain Tβ4.
It is composed of the same excipients as RGN-259 but does not contain Tβ4
Other Names:
  • Vehicle Control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Complete Healing at Day 29.
Time Frame: 29 days after first dosing
Percentage of subjects achieving complete healing of the persistent epithelial defect as determined by corneal fluorescein staining at day 29 after first dosing.
29 days after first dosing

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Complete Healing at 8, 15, 22, 36, 43 Days
Time Frame: 8, 15, 22, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Percentage of subjects achieving complete healing of the Persistent Epithelial Defect(PED) determined by corneal fluorescein staining at 8, 15, 22, 36, 43 days after first dosing.
8, 15, 22, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Epithelial Defect Measurement and Classification as Stage 1, 2 or 3 Using Mackie Classification.
Time Frame: 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Epithelial Defect Measurement and Classification as stage 1, 2 or 3 using Mackie Classification at 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Tear Film Break-up Time at 29, 36, 43 Days
Time Frame: 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Tear Film Break-up Time at 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Ocular Discomfort by Questionnaire at 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 Days After First Dosing
Time Frame: 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Ocular Discomfort by Questionnaire at 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 Days After First Dosing at Visits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (The scale used to determine the difference in Ocular Discomfort by questionnaire on each visit is from 0(None) to 5(Most). This outcome was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the first dosing points and the lower value are considered to be a better outcome. and the all relevant time points used in the calculation in the Time Frame was 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days.)
8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Visual Acuity(logMAR) at 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 Days
Time Frame: 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing

Visual acuity(logMAR) at 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days

(The Visual acuity was assessed by LogMAR calculation method. In the case of the LogMAR method, Each letter has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there are 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the LogMAR chart represents a change of 0.1 log units. and The lower value are considered to be a better outcome.)

The formula used in calculating the score is:

LogMAR VA = 0.1 + LogMAR value of the best line read - 0.02 X (number of optotypes read)

used to determine the difference in Ocular Discomfort by questionnaire on each visit is the ORA scale: 0 None to 5: Most

And as this outcome was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the first dosing points, The lower value are considered to be a better outcome. and the all relevant time points used in the calculation in the Time Frame was 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days.)

8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Participants With an Abnormal Findings by Slit-lamp Biomicroscopy at 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 Days
Time Frame: 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing

The number of participants with a abnormal findings by Slit-lamp biomicroscopy at 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days

This outcome was assessed by the number of participants with an abnormal findings which are clinically significant using slit-lamp biomicroscopy which provides a magnified view of intraocular structures in the Cornea, Conjunctiva, Anterior Chamber, Iris, Lens, Eyelid.

8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Corneal Sensitivity Using the Aesthesiometer (Cochet-Bonnet)
Time Frame: 29, 43 days after first dosing
Corneal Sensitivity using the aesthesiometer (Cochet-Bonnet) at 29, 43 days after first dosing
29, 43 days after first dosing
The Number of Participants With an Abnormal Findings by Dilated Fundoscopy at 29, 43 Days
Time Frame: 29, 43 days after first dosing

The number of participants with an abnormal findings by Dilated Fundoscopy at 29, 43 days

This outcome was assessed by the number of participants with an abnormal findings which are clinically significant using Dilated Fundoscopy which is a diagnostic procedure to view the eye's interior, allowing assessment of the Vitreous, Retina, Macula, Choroid, and Optic Nerve.

29, 43 days after first dosing
Intraocular Pressure
Time Frame: 29, 43 days after first dosing
Intraocular Pressure at 29, 43 days after first dosing
29, 43 days after first dosing

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 17, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 9, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

November 9, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RGN-NK-301

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurotrophic Keratopathy

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe