Evaluation of NoL Index and ANI After Nociceptive Stimulation at Different Infusion Rates of Remifentanil Infusion

November 16, 2016 updated by: Philippe Richebé, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital

Evaluation of NoL Index and ANI Variations After Nociceptive Stimulation Under Different Rates of Infusion of Intravenous Remifentanil in Patients Undergoing Laparotomies With Intraoperative Epidural Analgesia

Contrary to "immobility" and, to a lesser extent, to the "hypnosis/unconsciousness" component of general anaesthesia, the monitoring of "analgesia" remains largely elusive, evaluated mainly through poorly sensitive and potentially undesirable changes in patients' vital signs. This has led the industry to pursue the development of various devices and indices based on other physiological parameters such as heart rate variability (HRV), electroencephalogram (EEG), skin conductance, to name only a few. To the best of the knowledge, none of these parameters on its own has shown sufficient capacity in detecting different degrees of pain/analgesia balance to gain wide clinical use.

The purpose of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the response of a single-parameter index (the Analgesia Nociception Index [ANI]) and a multi-parameter index (the Nociception Level [NoL] Index) when patients under combined general anaesthesia/epidural anaesthesia for laparotomies are subjected to a standardized painful stimulus (a tetanic stimulation over the ulnar nerve at 70 mA, 100 Hz for 30 seconds) at different doses of remifentanil infusion at steady state (0,005 mcg/kg/min; 0,05 mcg/kg/min; 0,1 mcg/kg/min; 0,15 mcg/kg/min). With the painful stimulus held constant but the analgesia provided gradually increased, it is expected to characterize the response of these two indices to different levels of nociception/anti-nociception balance.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery by laparotomy (general surgery or gynaecological surgery) will receive a thoracic epidural (around T9-T10/T10-T11) and general anesthesia. Apart from standard monitoring, the ANI (derived from the EKG) and the NoL index (obtained via a finger probe) will be recorded. The epidural catheter will be injected with 6-10 ml of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 5 mcg/ml to produce anesthetic level of neuraxial blocade and then be perfused with the same solution at 4-8 ml/hour. After incision and confirmation of adequate blocade with the epidural local anesthetic, the patient will receive a series of painful electric stimulation with a standard nerve stimulator applied over the ulnar nerve in tetanic mode for 30 seconds at 100 Hz and 70mA. Each stimulation will occur at a different rate of infusion of IV remifentanil at steady state (0,005 mcg/kg/min; 0,05 mcg/kg/min; 0,1 mcg/kg/min; 0,15 mcg/kg/min). A stimulation at 0,005 mcg/kg/min will be done before and after epidural loading with local anesthetics to look for altered variations in analysed parameters. The variation and the kinetic of the variations after stimulations will be observed for heart rate, mean blood pressure, BIS, ANI and NoL index.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery by laparotomy (general surgery or gynaecological surgery) who will receive a thoracic epidural (around T9-T10/T10-T11) and general anesthesia.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA status I, II or III
  • Elective abdominal surgery with median laparotomy under general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coronary artery disease
  • Serious cardiac arrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation)
  • Patient refusal
  • History of substance abuse
  • Chronic use of psychotropic and/or opioid drugs
  • Use of drugs that act on the autonomic nervous system (including β-blockers)
  • History of psychiatric diseases or psychological problems
  • Contraindications to epidural analgesia
  • Allergy to remifentanil
  • Unexpected difficult airway requesting excessive, possibly painful airway manipulations.
  • Dural puncture during epidural catheter installation
  • Failure of epidural analgesia
  • Surgical unexpected complications requiring strong haemodynamic support (transfusions, vasopressors, inotropes)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Tetanic stimulation
Single arm study. See Study description for a through description of the intervention.
Standard Tetanic stimulation will be used as the stimulus to evaluate responses of the intraoperative pain indexes (ANI and NoL) at different concentration of i.v. remifentanil during anesthesia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between NoL index responses to electrical stimulus and the i.v. doses of remifentanil infusion given during anesthesia. The n of patients (40 in this study) is calculated on this primary outcome.
Time Frame: At time of surgery
The electrical stimulus will be applied on the forearm of the asleep patient at different doses of iv remifentanil (0.005mcg/kg/min to a maximum of 0.15 mcg/kg.min during anesthesia for abdominal surgery with active intraoperative epidural pain management). It will be evaluated whether or not exists a correlation between the doses of iv remifentanil and the responses of the Nol index after electrical stimulus.
At time of surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NoL index changes after a standardized electrical stimulus at 4 different concentrations of iv remifentanil infusion
Time Frame: At time of surgery
Measure the NoL changes after a nociceptive stimulus at various intravenous remifentanil infusion doses.
At time of surgery
ANI index changes after a standardized electrical stimulus at 4 different concentrations of iv remifentanil infusion
Time Frame: At time of surgery
Measure the ANI changes after a nociceptive stimulus at various intravenous remifentanil infusion doses. ANI being another uniparametric pain index.
At time of surgery
Heart rate changes after a standardized electrical stimulus at 4 different concentrations of iv remifentanil infusion
Time Frame: At time of surgery
Measure the changes of Heart Rate after a nociceptive stimulus at various intravenous remifentanil infusion doses.
At time of surgery
Mean Blood Pressure changes after a standardized electrical stimulus at 4 different concentrations of iv remifentanil infusion
Time Frame: At time of surgery
Measure the changes of Heart Rate after a nociceptive stimulus at various intravenous remifentanil infusion doses.
At time of surgery
Sensitivity and specificity of NoL index, ANI index, Heart Rate and Mean blood Pressure in detecting a painful stimulus such as intubation as well as standardized electrical stimulus at remifentanil infusion of 0.005 msg/kg/min
Time Frame: At time of surgery
Measure the sensitivity and specificity of these 4 criteria in detecting a painful stimulus such as intubation and standardized electrical stimulus
At time of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philippe Richebé, M.D. PhD, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Tetanic stimulation

Subscribe