Atorvastatin Treatment of Cavernous Angiomas With Symptomatic Hemorrhage Exploratory Proof of Concept (AT CASH EPOC) Trial (AT CASH EPOC)

August 20, 2025 updated by: University of Chicago

Phase I-II Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Blinded, Single-Site Clinical Trial of Atorvastatin in the Treatment of Cavernous Angiomas With Symptomatic Hemorrhage Exploratory Proof of Concept (AT CASH EPOC)

This phase I/II randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, single-site clinical trial is designed to investigate the effect of a prolonged course of atorvastatin versus placebo on CCM lesional iron deposition assessed by validated quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) MRI studies in patients who suffered a symptomatic bleed within the preceding one year.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This phase I/II randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, single-site clinical trial is designed to investigate the effect of a prolonged course of atorvastatin versus placebo on CCM lesional iron deposition assessed by validated quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) MRI studies in patients who suffered a symptomatic bleed within the preceding one year. Subjects will also be assessed by lesional and brain vascular permeability MRI using dynamic contrast enhanced quantitative perfusion (DCEQP) and a number of clinical evaluation tools. Subjects shall be followed for 2 years from randomization, the period of highest likelihood of rebleed after a recent CCM hemorrhage. Subjects will undergo clinical and MRI evaluations at baseline, and at 12 and 24 months during the study period. Enrolled subjects and the treating team will be blinded to treatment group allocation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of CCM of any genotype supported by relevant imaging studies.
  2. Symptomatic CCM bleeding event within 1 year prior to enrollment.
  3. Must be willing/able to travel to the study site for all study visits (baseline, 12 months, and 24 months) over the course of the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pre-menopausal women who are breastfeeding, pregnant or likely to get pregnant during the study period.
  2. Previous cranial irradiation or surgical/radiosurgical treatment of CCM lesion.
  3. Failure to pass MRI safety screening (claustrophobia, metal implant . . . etc)
  4. Known allergy or intolerance to gadolinium.
  5. Severely impaired renal function (eGFR < 60ml/min), active renal disease or status post-kidney transplants.
  6. Statin therapy, for any indication, for more than 7 continuous days or greater than 14 total days within 12 months preceding enrollment.
  7. Indication to use statin medication for current approved indication, unrelated to CCM
  8. Known allergy or intolerance to statins
  9. Liver dysfunction or active liver disease (including chronic viral hepatitis) defined as baseline serum transaminases levels twice the upper range of normal.
  10. Previous diagnosis of skeletal muscle disorders of any cause (myopathy), or baseline creatine kinase level five times the upper range of normal.
  11. Currently treated with or likely to need treatment with one or more of prohibited medications listed in the protocol.
  12. Active drug or alcohol use or dependence that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements.
  13. Serious illness (requiring systemic treatment and/or hospitalization) until subject either completes therapy or is clinically stable on therapy, in the opinion of the site investigator, for at least 30 days prior to study entry.
  14. Any other condition that the investigator believes would pose a significant hazard to the subject if the investigational therapy were initiated, including conditions resulting in or precipitating myopathy (e.g. HIV, uncontrolled hypothyroidism).
  15. In the investigator's opinion, the patient is unstable, and would benefit from a specific intervention rather than treatment with atorvastatin.
  16. Inability or unwillingness of subject or legal guardian/representative to give written informed consent.
  17. No documentation of valid healthcare insurance.
  18. No medical record confirmation of primary care physician.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Treatment
Atorvastatin 80mg OD (optimal dose). Treatment dose will be de-escalated to 40mg based on reported adverse events.
40-80 mg OD
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Identically looking capsules containing no active ingredient
inactive

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change in Mean Lesional QSM (QSM Change Score)
Time Frame: 2 years of follow-up

QSM change score is the Percentage Change in mean lesional iron deposition per year (QSM score) according to assigned treatment (modified intention-to-treat cohort), presented as a mean value across all participants from baseline to year 1 and year 1 to year 2 follow-up MRIs.

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is a noninvasive MRI technique that assesses iron content by quantifying the magnetic susceptibility of local tissues.

A higher QSM value corresponds to a larger amount of iron in the lesion, which means more blood is present in the lesion.

2 years of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change in Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Quantitative Perfusion (DCEQP) Value (Vascular Permeability) in Index Lesion (Lesional DCEQP Change Score)
Time Frame: 2 years of follow-up

DCEQP change score is the absolute value of the Percent Change in DCEQP value of the index lesion, presented as a mean value across all participants from baseline to year 1 and year 1 to year 2 follow-up MRIs

DCEQP measures vascular permeability and perfusion, in this case as measured in the index lesion. A higher DCEQP value reflects higher permeability in the lesion.

2 years of follow-up
Compare the Changes in Modified Rankin Score Between Atorvastatin and Placebo Groups at the Year 1 Follow-up Visit
Time Frame: 1 year of follow-up

Compare the changes in modified Rankin Score between atorvastatin and placebo groups at the year 1 follow-up visit.

The mRS is a simple global measure of functional disability. Scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). An mRS score of 0 to 1 is considered a minimal clinical disability, and 0 to 2 is independent.

1 year of follow-up
Compare the Changes in Modified Rankin Score Between Atorvastatin and Placebo Groups at the Year 2 Follow-up Visit.
Time Frame: 1 year of follow-up (from year 1 to year 2)

Compare the changes in modified Rankin Score between atorvastatin and placebo groups at the year 2 follow-up visit (change between mRS score at year 1 follow up visit and year 2 follow up visit).

The mRS is a simple global measure of functional disability. Scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). An mRS score of 0 to 1 is considered a minimal clinical disability, and 0 to 2 is independent.

1 year of follow-up (from year 1 to year 2)
Mean Score of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at the Year 1 Follow-up Visit.
Time Frame: 1 year of follow up

Mean score of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at the year 1 follow-up visit

The EQ-VAS is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.

1 year of follow up
Mean Score of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at the Year 2 Follow-up Visit
Time Frame: 1 year of follow up (from year 1 to year 2)

Mean score of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at the year 2 follow-up visit

The EQ-VAS is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.

1 year of follow up (from year 1 to year 2)
Compare Rate of Drug Compliance in Atorvastatin vs Placebo Group
Time Frame: 2 years of follow-up
Compare number of subjects with 90% or greater protocol compliance throughout the 2 year follow-up period
2 years of follow-up
Mean Percent Change in Rho-associated Protein Kinase (ROCK) Activity in Peripheral Blood Leukocytes From Baseline to Year 1
Time Frame: 1 year of follow-up
Compare the mean percent change in peripheral blood leukocyte ROCK activity between atorvastatin and placebo groups from baseline to year 1
1 year of follow-up
Mean Percent Change in Rho-associated Protein Kinase (ROCK) Activity in Peripheral Blood Leukocytes From Baseline to Year 2
Time Frame: 2 year follow-up
Compare the mean percent change in peripheral blood leukocyte ROCK activity between atorvastatin and placebo groups from baseline to year 2
2 year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Issam A Awad, MD, Director of Neurovascular Surgery University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences
  • Study Chair: Daniel F Hanley, MD, Director, Division of Brain Injury Outcomes Service The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

November 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Cavernous Malformation

Clinical Trials on Atorvastatin

Subscribe