Selinexor in Advanced Liposarcoma (SEAL)

January 5, 2023 updated by: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc

A Phase 2-3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Selinexor (KPT-330) Versus Placebo in Patients With Advanced Unresectable Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma (DDLS)

This is a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2-3 study of patients diagnosed with advanced unresectable dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Approximately 342 total patients will be randomized to study treatment (selinexor or placebo).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In the Phase 2 portion of the study, 57 patients were randomized to selinexor (60 mg) or placebo at a 1:1 allocation ratio.

In the Phase 3 portion of the study, approximately 285 patients will be randomized to selinexor (60 mg) or placebo with a 2:1 allocation ratio.

Patients who progress during the blinded portion of the study will be unblinded and if receiving:

  • placebo, may cross over to open-label selinexor (60mg twice-weekly)
  • selinexor, will be withdrawn from further treatment and followed for survival

Study treatment will be given twice-weekly on Day 1 and Day 3 during Weeks 1-6 of each six-week (42 day) cycle until disease progression or intolerability.

Treatment will continue until one or more of the following occurs:

  • Disease progression, as defined by RECIST v1.1 Response Criteria
  • Clinical progression, as determined by the treating physician
  • Unacceptable adverse events (AEs) or failure to tolerate study treatment
  • Patient withdrawal
  • Patient discontinuation due to non-compliance

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

342

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, 1090
        • UZ Brussel
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1200
        • UCL Saint-Luc
      • Ghent, Belgium, 9000
        • UZ Gent
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G1Z2
        • Cross Cancer Center - Alberta Health Services
    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
        • The Ottawa Hospital Cancer
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
        • Princess Margaret Hospital
    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H4A3J1
        • McGill University
      • Bordeaux,, France, 33076
        • Institut Bergonié
      • Lille Cedex 307, France, 59020
        • Oscar Lambret Center
      • Lyon Cedex, France, 96373
        • Centre léon bérard
      • Marseille Cedex 5, France, 13385
        • Timone University Hospital
      • Montpellier, France, 34298
        • Institut Regional Du Cancer de Montpellier (Icm)
      • Nice, France, 06789
        • CLCC Antoine Lacassagne
      • Paris, France, 75248
        • Institut Curie
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Institut Claudius Regaud
      • Villejuif, France, 94110
        • Institut Gustave Roussy
      • Berlin, Germany, 13125
        • Helios Hospital Berlin-Buch
      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Technische Universitaet Dresden Med. Fakultaet Carl Gustav Carus Med. Klinik u. Poliklinik I
      • Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
        • National Center for Tumor Diseases, Univeristy Hospital Heidelberg
      • Mannheim, Germany, 68167
        • University Hospital Mannheim
      • Muenchen, Germany, 81675
        • Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Hämatologie und Onkologie Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU Muenchen
      • Be'er Sheva, Israel, 84101
        • Soroka University Medical Center
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91120
        • Hadassah Medical Center
      • Petach Tikva, Israel, 4941492
        • Rabin Medical Center
      • Ramat Gan, Israel, 52621
        • Sheba Medical Center
      • Tel Aviv, Israel, 64239
        • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical
      • Zerifin, Israel, 7030000
        • Assaf Harofe Medical Center
      • Candiolo, Italy, 10060
        • Candiolo Cancer Institute
      • Milano, Italy, 20133
        • Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan
      • Palermo, Italy, 90127
        • U.O.C. Oncologia Medica Oncology Department
      • Roma, Italy, 00128
        • Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico
      • Badalona, Spain, 41013
        • "Germans Trias Pujol" University Hospital
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Vall d´Hebron University Hospital
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08041
        • Hospital Sant Pau Barcelona
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08908
        • Hospital ICO Bellvitge
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41013
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
      • Valencia, Spain, 46026
        • Hospital La Fe Valencia
      • Göteborg, Sweden, 413 45
        • Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset
      • Lund, Sweden, 221 85
        • Skåne University Hospital
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 171 76
        • Onkologiska Kliniken
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
        • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, NW1 2BU
        • University College London Hospitals
      • London, United Kingdom, SW3 6JJ
        • The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M20 4BX
        • The Christie
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • University of California, Los Angeles
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90403
        • Sarcoma Oncology Center
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80202
        • University of Colorado-Denver
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520-8032
        • Yale Cancer Center
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21231
        • Johns Hopkins
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Dana Farber Cancer Institute
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic Rochester
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 11042
        • Northwell Health Physicians Partners
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke Institute of Cancer
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210-1240
        • James Cancer Center, Ohio State University
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health and Science
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111
        • Fox Chase Cancer Center
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19106
        • University of Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • MD Anderson
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109
        • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients ≥12 years of age
  2. Body surface area (BSA) ≥ 1.2 m2
  3. Histologic evidence of DDLS at any time prior to randomization AND current evidence of DDLS requiring treatment
  4. Must have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 Response Criteria
  5. Radiologic evidence of disease progression within 6 months prior to randomization. If the patient received other intervening therapy after documented disease progression, further disease progression must be documented after the completion of the intervening therapy
  6. Must have had at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy for liposarcoma (not to exceed 5 prior lines)
  7. If patient received any previous systemic therapy, the last dose must have been ≥ 21 days prior to randomization (or ≥ 5 half-lives of that drug, whichever is shorter) with all clinically significant therapy-related toxicities having resolved to ≤ Grade 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with pure well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS), myxoid/round cell or pleomorphic tumor histologic subtypes
  2. Known active hepatitis B (HepB), hepatitis C (HepC) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  3. Known central nervous system metastases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Phase 2 Double-blinded: Selinexor
Participants received a fixed blinding dose of 60 milligrams (mg) selinexor twice-weekly on Day 1 and 3 during each 6-week (42-day) cycle until progressive disease (PD).
Selinexor 60mg
Other Names:
  • KPT-330
Experimental: Phase 3 Double-blinded: Selinexor
Participants received a fixed blinding dose of 60 mg selinexor twice-weekly on Day 1 and 3 during each 6-week (42-day) cycle until PD.
Selinexor 60mg
Other Names:
  • KPT-330
Placebo Comparator: Phase 2 Double-blinded: Placebo Followed by Open Label- Selinexor
Participants received a fixed blinding dose of placebo matched to selinexor twice-weekly on Day 1 and 3 during each 6-week (42-day) cycle until PD in double-blinded treatment period. Participants in the placebo group who had PD during the Phase 2 double-blinded treatment, will be elected to cross over to open-label selinexor.
Other Names:
  • sugar pill
Placebo Comparator: Phase 3 Double-blinded: Placebo Followed by Open Label- Selinexor
Participants received a fixed blinding dose of placebo matched to selinexor twice-weekly on Day 1 and 3 during each 6-week (42-day) cycle until PD or development of unacceptable toxicity. Participants in the placebo group who had PD during the Phase 3 double-blinded treatment, will be elected to cross over to open-label selinexor.
Other Names:
  • sugar pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase 3 Double Blind: Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the first date of disease progression, or death due to any cause whichever occurred first (up to 57 months)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first date of Independent Review Committee (IRC)-confirmed PD per RECIST version 1.1, or death due to any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter (SLD) recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
From the date of randomization until the first date of disease progression, or death due to any cause whichever occurred first (up to 57 months)
Phase 3 Open Label: Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST Version 1.1
Time Frame: From the date of randomization in the Phase 3 open label period until the first date of disease progression, or death due to any cause whichever occurred first (up to 57 months)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization in the Phase 3 open-label period until the first date of IRC-confirmed PD per RECIST version 1.1, or death due to any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
From the date of randomization in the Phase 3 open label period until the first date of disease progression, or death due to any cause whichever occurred first (up to 57 months)
Phase 2 Double Blind: Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST Version 1.1
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the first date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 57 months)
PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization until the first date of IRC-confirmed PD per RECIST version 1.1, or death due to any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
From date of randomization until the first date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 57 months)
Phase 2 Open Label: Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST Version 1.1
Time Frame: From date of randomization in the Phase 2 open label period until the first date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 57 months)
PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization in the Phase 2 open-label period until the first date of IRC-confirmed PD per RECIST version 1.1, or death due to any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
From date of randomization in the Phase 2 open label period until the first date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 57 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase 3 Double Blind: Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From date of randomization until death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
OS was defined as the duration (in months) from the date of randomization to death from any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at the date of discontinuation from the study, or database cut date, whichever was earlier.
From date of randomization until death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
Phase 3 Open Label: Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From date of randomization in phase 3 open label period until death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
OS was defined as the duration (in months) from the date of randomization in the Phase 3 open-label period to death from any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at the date of discontinuation from the study, or database cut date, whichever was earlier.
From date of randomization in phase 3 open label period until death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
Phase 2 Double Blind: Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
OS was defined as the duration (in months) from the date of randomization to death from any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at the date of discontinuation from the study, or database cut date, whichever was earlier.
From the date of randomization until death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
Phase 2 Open Label: Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From date of randomization in the Phase 2 open-label period until death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
OS was defined as the duration (in months) from the date of randomization in the Phase 2 open-label period to death from any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at the date of discontinuation from the study, or database cut date, whichever was earlier.
From date of randomization in the Phase 2 open-label period until death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
Phase 3 Double Blind: Time-to-Progression (TTP) as Per RECIST Version 1.1
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the first date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization until ICR-determined PD per RECIST version 1.1, or death due to disease progression, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
From date of randomization until the first date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
Phase 3 Open Label: Time-to-Progression (TTP) as Per RECIST Version 1.1
Time Frame: From date of randomization in the Phase 3 open label period until the first date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization in the Phase 3 open-label period until ICR-determined PD per RECIST version 1.1, or death due to disease progression, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
From date of randomization in the Phase 3 open label period until the first date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
Phase 2 Double Blind: Time-to-Progression (TTP) as Per RECIST Version 1.1
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the first date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization until ICR-determined PD as per RECIST version 1.1, or death due to disease progression, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
From date of randomization until the first date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
Phase 2 Open Label: Time-to-Progression (TTP) as Per RECIST Version 1.1
Time Frame: From date of randomization in the Phase 2 open-label period until the first date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization in the Phase 2 open-label period until ICR-determined PD per RECIST version 1.1, or death due to disease progression, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
From date of randomization in the Phase 2 open-label period until the first date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
Phase 3 Double Blind: Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the documentation of CR or PR (up to 70 months)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), per RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
From date of randomization until the documentation of CR or PR (up to 70 months)
Phase 3 Open Label: Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: From date of randomization in the Phase 3 open label period until the documentation of CR or PR (up to 70 months)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR or PR, per RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
From date of randomization in the Phase 3 open label period until the documentation of CR or PR (up to 70 months)
Phase 2 Double Blind: Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the documentation of CR or PR (up to 70 months)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR or PR, per RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
From date of randomization until the documentation of CR or PR (up to 70 months)
Phase 2 Open Label: Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: From date of randomization in the Phase 2 open-label period until the documentation of CR or PR (up to 70 months)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR or PR, per RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
From date of randomization in the Phase 2 open-label period until the documentation of CR or PR (up to 70 months)
Phase 3 Double Blind: Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: From first occurrence of CR or PR until the first date of PD (up to 70 months)
DOR was defined as the time from first occurrence of CR or PR until the first date of PD per RECIST version 1.1 or death. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
From first occurrence of CR or PR until the first date of PD (up to 70 months)
Phase 3 Double Blind: Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigator Assessment
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the first date of disease progression, or death due to any cause whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization until the first date of PD, per RECIST version 1.1, or death due to any cause as defined by the Investigator based on clinical and/or radiologic criteria. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
From the date of randomization until the first date of disease progression, or death due to any cause whichever occurred first (up to 70 months)
Phase 3 Double Blind: Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)
Time Frame: Time from randomization to the first new antineoplastic therapy or death due to any cause (up to 70 months)
TTNT was defined as time since randomization until the first new antineoplastic therapy or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time from randomization to the first new antineoplastic therapy or death due to any cause (up to 70 months)
Phase 2 Double Blind: Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)
Time Frame: Time from randomization to the first new antineoplastic therapy or death due to any cause (up to 70 months)
TTNT was defined as time since randomization until the first new antineoplastic therapy or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time from randomization to the first new antineoplastic therapy or death due to any cause (up to 70 months)
Phase 3 Double Blind: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Time Frame: From start of study drug administration up to 70 months
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. A TEAE was defined as those AEs that develop or worsen after the first dose of study drug. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.
From start of study drug administration up to 70 months
Phase 3 Open Label: Number of Participants With TEAEs and Serious TEAEs
Time Frame: From start of study drug administration up to 70 months
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An SAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs were defined as those AEs that develop or worsen after the first dose of study drug. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.
From start of study drug administration up to 70 months
Phase 2 Double Blind: Number of Participants With TEAEs and Serious TEAEs
Time Frame: From start of study drug administration up to 70 months
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs were defined as those AEs that develop or worsen after the first dose of study drug. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.
From start of study drug administration up to 70 months
Phase 2 Open Label: Number of Participants With TEAEs and Serious TEAEs
Time Frame: From start of study drug administration up to 70 months
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An SAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs were defined as those AEs that develop or worsen after the first dose of study drug. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.
From start of study drug administration up to 70 months
Phase 3 Double Blind: Change From Baseline in Quality-of-life Questionnaire 30 Item (QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 1387
The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of patients with cancer. QLQ-C30 contains 30 questions that include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive functioning); three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting and pain); six single-item symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties); and global health status/quality of life (QoL). Most questions used a 4-point scale (from 1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (from 1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the functional scales and the global health status/QoL, a higher score represents a better level of functioning (better health status); for the symptom scales/items, a higher score represents a higher level of symptomatology/problems (worse health status).
Baseline up to Day 1387
Phase 3 Open Label: Change From Baseline in Quality-of-life Questionnaire 30 Item (QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 379
The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of patients with cancer. QLQ-C30 contains 30 questions that include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive functioning); three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting and pain); six single-item symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties); and global health status/quality of life (QoL). Most questions used a 4-point scale (from 1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (from 1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the functional scales and the global health status/QoL, a higher score represents a better level of functioning (better health status); for the symptom scales/items, a higher score represents a higher level of symptomatology/problems (worse health status).
Baseline up to Day 379

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Michael Kauffman, MD, Ph.D, Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 26, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 17, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe