A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide, Insulin Degludec and Liraglutide in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. (DUAL™ I Japan)

March 10, 2021 updated by: Novo Nordisk A/S

A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide, Insulin Degludec and Liraglutide in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide, insulin degludec and liraglutide in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

819

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 123-0845
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Akita-shi, Akita, Japan, 010-8543
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Annaka-shi, Gunma, Japan, 379-0116
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Asahikawa-shi, Hokkaido, Japan, 070-0002
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan, 260-0804
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Chitose, Hokkaido, Japan, 066-0032
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Chuo-ku,, Japan, 104 0061
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 103-0002
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Chuo-ku,Tokyo, Japan, 103-0025
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 134-0084
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, Japan, 251-0041
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, Japan, 819-0168
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Fukushima, Japan, 963-8851
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Gunma, Japan, 373-0036
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, Japan, 192-0917
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 060-0062
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 078-8236
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Ibaraki, Japan, 311-0113
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Ichihara-shi, Chiba, Japan, 290-0003
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Iruma-shi, Saitama, Japan, 358-0011
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 173-0004
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 175-0093
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Izumisano-shi, Japan, 598 0048
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Izumisano-shi,Osaka, Japan, 598-8577
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kagoshima-shi, Kagoshima, Japan, 890-0061
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kamakura-shi, Japan, 247 0056
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kanagawa, Japan, 235-0045
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kanra-gun, Gunma, Japan, 370-2214
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kashiwara-shi, Osaka, Japan, 582-0005
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kawagoe-shi, Saitama, Japan, 350-0851
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kawaguchi-shi, Saitama, Japan, 332-0012
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kawasaki-shi,Kanagawa, Japan, 215-0026
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kisarazu-shi, Chiba, Japan, 292-0038
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kobe-shi, Hyogo, Japan
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kuki-shi, Saitama, Japan, 346-8530
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kumamoto, Japan, 862-0976
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kumamoto-shi, Kumamoto, Japan, 860-0811
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kumamoto-shi, Kumamoto, Japan, 861-8039
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kushiro-shi, Hokkaido, Japan, 085-0032
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan, 606-8507
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 108-0075
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Mito-shi, Ibaraki, Japan, 310-0826
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Mito-shi, Ibaraki, Japan, 311-4153
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Miura-shi, Kanagawa, Japan, 238-0101
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Miyazaki, Japan, 880-0034
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Nagoya-shi, Aichi, Japan, 455-8530
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Nagoya-shi, Aichi, Japan, 456-0058
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Nishinomiya-shi, Hygo, Japan, 662 0971
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Obihiro-shi, Hokkaido, Japan, 080 0016
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Obihiro-shi, Hokkaido, Japan, 080 0848
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Oita-shi, Japan, 870 0039
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Okawa-shi, Fukuoka, Japan, 831-0016
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Onga-gun, Fukuoka, Japan, 811-4342
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Osaka, Japan, 569-1045
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan, 530-0013
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan, 533-0024
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan, 536-0001
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Ota-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 1430015
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Saijo-shi, Ehime, Japan, 793-0027
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido, Japan, 060-0001
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido, Japan, 004-0004
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Sendai-shi, Miyagi, Japan, 980-0011
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Sendai-shi, Miyagi, Japan, 980-0021
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, Japan, 329-0433
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Shizuoka-shi, Shizuoka, Japan, 424-0853
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Tochigi, Japan, 323-0022
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 103-0027
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 103-0028
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 104-0031
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 169-0073
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Toshima-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 171-0021
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Toyonaka-shi, Osaka, Japan, 560-0082
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Ube-shi, Yamaguchi, Japan, 755-0046
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Urasoe-shi,, Japan, 901 2104
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Yamaguchi-shi, Yamaguchi, Japan, 754-0002
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Yamato-shi, Kanagawa, Japan, 242-0004
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female Japanese subjects, age at least 20 years at the time of signing informed consent
  • Type 2 diabetes subjects (diagnosed clinically) at least 6 months prior to screening
  • HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) 7.0-11.0 % (both inclusive) by central laboratory analysis, with the aim of a median of 8.3%. When approximately 50% of the randomised subjects have a HbA1c above 8.3%, the remaining subjects randomised must have a HbA1c below or equal to 8.3%; or when approximately 50% of the randomised subjects have a HbA1c below or equal to 8.3%, the remaining subjects randomised must have a HbA1c above 8.3%
  • Body-mass index (BMI) above or equal to 20 kg/m^2
  • Subjects on stable therapy with one OAD (defined as unchanged medication and unchanged dose) for at least 60 days (metformin, a-GI, TZD, SU, SGLT2i or glinide) prior to screening according to approved Japanese labelling

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treatment with insulin (except for short-term treatment in connection with intercurrent illness including gestational diabetes)
  • Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes or obesity other than stated in the inclusion criteria in a period of 60 days before screening
  • Anticipated initiation or change in concomitant medications in excess of 14 days known to affect weight or glucose metabolism
  • Impaired liver function, defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) equal to or above 2.5 times upper limit of normal
  • Renal impairment estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) below 60mL/min/1.73m^2 as per Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)
  • Screening calcitonin equal to or above 50 ng/L
  • History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic)
  • Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN 2)
  • Subjects presently classified as being in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Insulin degludec/liraglutide OD
Injected s.c. / subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily (OD) , in combination with pre-trial OAD (oral antidiabetic drug)kept in unchanged dose.
Active Comparator: Insulin degludec OD
Injected s.c. / subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily (OD) , in combination with pre-trial OAD (oral antidiabetic drug)kept in unchanged dose.
Active Comparator: Liraglutide OD
Injected s.c. / subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily (OD) , in combination with pre-trial OAD (oral antidiabetic drug)kept in unchanged dose.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) Tested for Non-inferiority of IDegLira vs IDeg and Superiority of IDegLira vs Lira
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 52
Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c after 52 weeks of treatment was measured. Statistical analyses were performed to test the hypotheses: non-inferiority of IDegLira vs. IDeg and superiority of IDegLira vs. Liraglutide (Lira).
Week 0, Week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Body Weight (kg)
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 52
Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight after 52 weeks of treatment.
Week 0, Week 52
Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Time Frame: Weeks 0-52

Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product.

Severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.

Severe hypoglycaemia according to the ADA definition: an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions. Plasma glucose concentrations may not be available during an event, but neurological recovery following the return of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration.

Weeks 0-52
Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) Tested for Superiority of IDegLira vs IDeg
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 52
Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c after 52 weeks of treatment was measured. Statistical analysis was performed to test the hypothesis: superiority of IDegLira vs. IDeg.
Week 0, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 52
Change from baseline (week 0) in FPG after 52 weeks
Week 0, Week 52
Insulin Dose
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Actual daily total insulin dose after 52 weeks of treatment.
After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 7.0%
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 7.0% after 52 weeks of treatment.
After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 7.0% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 7.0% and without weight gain after 52 weeks of treatment.
After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 7.0% Without Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Last 12 Weeks of Treatment.
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment

Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 7.0% after 52 weeks, who did not experience treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment.

Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product.

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.

After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 7.0% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero and Without Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Last 12 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment

Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 7.0% and without weight gain, who did not experience treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment.

Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product.

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.

After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 6.5%
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 6.5% after 52 weeks of treatment.
After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 6.5% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 6.5% and without weight gain after 52 weeks of treatment.
After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 6.5% Without Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Last 12 Weeks of Treatment.
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment

Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 6.5% after 52 weeks, who did not experience treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment.

Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product.

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.

After 52 weeks of treatment
Responder (Yes/no): HbA1c Less Than 6.5% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero and Without Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Last 12 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment

Number of subjects with HbA1c less than 6.5% with no weight gain, who did not experience treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment.

Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product.

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.

After 52 weeks of treatment
Change in Waist Circumference
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 52
Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumference after 52 weeks of treatment.
Week 0, Week 52
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic)
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 52
Change from baseline in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) after 52 weeks of treatment.
Week 0, Week 52
Self-Measured Blood Glucose (SMBG) 9-point Profile: 9-point Profile (Individual Points in the Profile)
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of the treatment
Subjects were instructed to measure their plasma glucose at following timepoints: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4:00 a.m. and before breakfast the following day.
After 52 weeks of the treatment
Change in SMBG 9-point Profile - Mean of the 9-point Profile
Time Frame: Week 0, week 52
Subjects were instructed to measure their plasma glucose at following timepoints: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4:00 a.m. and before breakfast the following day. Mean of the 9-point profile was defined as the area under the profile (calculated using the trapezoidal method) divided by the measurement time.
Week 0, week 52
Change in SMBG 9-point Profile - Mean of Postprandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After for Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 52
Subjects were instructed to measure their plasma glucose at following timepoints: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4:00 a.m. and before breakfast the following day. The mean increment over all meals was derived as the mean of all available meal increments.
Week 0, week 52
Total Cholesterol as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Total cholesterol after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
After 52 weeks of treatment
Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
After 52 weeks of treatment
High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
After 52 weeks of treatment
Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
After 52 weeks of treatment
Triglycerides as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Triglycerides after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
After 52 weeks of treatment
Free Fatty Acids as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Free fatty acids after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
After 52 weeks of treatment
Fasting C-peptide as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Fasting C-peptide after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
After 52 weeks of treatment
Fasting Human Insulin as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Fasting human insulin after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
After 52 weeks of treatment
Fasting Glucagon as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Fasting glucagon after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
After 52 weeks of treatment
Proinsulin as a Ratio to Baseline at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: After 52 weeks of treatment
Proinsulin after 52 weeks of treatment was represented as ratio to baseline (week 0) values.
After 52 weeks of treatment
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: 0-52 weeks
Treatment emergent adverse event is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product. If the event had onset date before the first day of exposure on randomised treatment and increased in severity during the treatment period and until 7 days after the last drug date, then this event was considered as a TEAE.
0-52 weeks
Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Time Frame: 0-52 weeks

Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product.

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.

Severe hypoglycaemia according to the ADA definition: an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions. Plasma glucose concentrations may not be available during an event, but neurological recovery following the return of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration.

0-52 weeks
Number of Treatment Emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Time Frame: 0-52 weeks

Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product. Nocturnal period: The period between 00:01 and 05:59 a.m. (both inclusive).

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.

Severe hypoglycaemia according to the ADA definition: an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions. Plasma glucose concentrations may not be available during an event, but neurological recovery following the return of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration.

0-52 weeks
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to American Diabetes Association (ADA) Definition
Time Frame: 0-52 weeks

Results represent total number of treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes that fall under ADA's definition of hypoglycaemia. ADA's definition of hypoglycaemia includes following categories:

  1. Severe hypoglycaemia
  2. Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia
  3. Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia
  4. Probable symptomatic hypoglycaemia
  5. Pseudo-hypoglycaemia. Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product.
0-52 weeks
Anti-drug Antibodies: Anti-insulin Degludec Antibodies
Time Frame: at week 52
Insulin degludec (IDeg)-specific antibodies were measured at week 52, as %B/T (percentage of bound & precipitated radioactive drug/total added drug to the sample). A sample is measured in 2 different series. In series 1, the radioactive IDeg (tracer) and surplus unlabeled IDeg are added to the sample. In series 2, the tracer and surplus unlabeled human insulin are added to the sample. Series 1 represents unspecific background binding. Series 2 represents IDeg specific antibodies including unspecific background binding. The reported %B/T is calculated by subtracting the background %B/T in series 1 from the %B/T result in series 2. If the background result has higher values than the %B/T in series 2, the resulting value is negative %B/T. Here, a negative %B/T value means that the test samples do not have IDeg-specific antibodies. The reason for getting a negative value for %B/T is due to variation in the analytical background. Thus, the results presented are not a change from baseline.
at week 52
Anti-drug Antibodies: Number of Participants Positive or Negative for Anti-liraglutide Antibodies
Time Frame: at week 52
Anti-liraglutide antibodies were measured at week 52. Number of participants positive or negative for anti-liraglutide antibodies at week 52 were reported.
at week 52
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Fundoscopy or Fundus Photography
Time Frame: at screening (week -2 to week 0), at week 52
The result of the fundus photography/dilated fundoscopy was interpreted by the investigator into following categories: Normal; Abnormal (Abn), Not Clinically significant (NCS); Abnormal, Clinically significant (CS). Reported results are number of subjects with 'normal'; 'Abn, NCS' and 'Abn, CS' fundoscopy/fundus photography results at screening (week -2 to week 0) and week 52.
at screening (week -2 to week 0), at week 52
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Time Frame: at screening (week -2 to week 0), at week 52
The result of the ECG was interpreted by the investigator into following categories: Normal; Abnormal (Abn), Not Clinically significant (NCS); Abnormal, Clinically significant (CS). Reported results are number of subjects with 'normal'; 'Abn, NCS' and 'Abn, CS' ECG results at screening (week -2 to week 0) and week 52.
at screening (week -2 to week 0), at week 52
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Pulse
Time Frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in pulse after 52 weeks of treatment.
Week 0, week 52
Serum Concentrations of Insulin Degludec
Time Frame: Weeks 2, 8, 16, 26, 44, 52
Samples from the IDegLira and IDeg arms were analysed for serum concentrations of insulin degludec using validated ELISA assays.
Weeks 2, 8, 16, 26, 44, 52
Plasma Concentrations of Liraglutide
Time Frame: Weeks 2, 8, 16, 26, 44, 52
Samples from the IDegLira and liraglutide arms were assayed for plasma concentrations of liraglutide using validated ELISA assays.
Weeks 2, 8, 16, 26, 44, 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 18, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 22, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

According to the Novo Nordisk disclosure commitment on novonordisk-trials.com

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on insulin degludec/liraglutide

Subscribe