- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02607956
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV-1) Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults
February 10, 2022 updated by: Gilead Sciences
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of GS-9883/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults
This primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a fixed dose combination (FDC) containing bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) versus dolutegravir (DTG) + a FDC containing emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral treatment-naive adults.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
657
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New South Wales
-
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2010 NSW
-
-
Victoria
-
Carlton, Victoria, Australia, 3053
-
Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168
-
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
-
Prahran, Victoria, Australia, 3181
- Prahran Market Clinic
-
Prahran, Victoria, Australia, 3068
-
-
-
-
-
Antwerp, Belgium, 2000
-
Ghent, Belgium, B-9000
-
-
-
-
-
Montreal, Canada, H4A 3J1
- McGill University Health Center
-
Ottawa, Canada, K1H 8L6
-
Toronto, Canada, M4N 3M5
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
-
Toronto, Canada, M5G 1K2
-
Toronto, Canada, M5G2N2
-
Winnipeg, Canada, R3A 1R9
-
-
-
-
-
Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, 10103
-
-
-
-
-
Montpellier, France, 34295
-
Nice, France, 06200
- CHU de Nice Archet I
-
Tourcoing, France, 59200
-
Tourcoing, France, 59208
-
-
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 12157
-
Düsseldorf, Germany, 40237
-
Essen, Germany, 45122
-
Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
-
Frankfurt, Germany, 60311
-
Hamburg, Germany, 20146
-
Köln, Germany, 50924
- Uniklinik Köln
-
München, Germany, 80335
-
-
-
-
-
Bergamo, Italy, 24127
-
Milano, Italy, 20127
-
Roma, Italy
-
-
-
-
-
San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00909
-
San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00909-1711
-
-
-
-
-
Alicante, Spain, 3010
-
Badalona, Spain, 08907
-
Madrid, Spain, 28046
-
Madrid, Spain, 28034
- Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
-
Madrid, Spain, 28034
-
Madrid, Spain, 28007
-
Malaga, Spain, 29010
-
Vigo, Spain, 36312
-
-
-
-
-
Birmingham, United Kingdom, B9 5SS
-
Birmingham, United Kingdom, B4 6DH
-
London, United Kingdom, NW3 2QG
-
London, United Kingdom, SW17 0QT
- St George's Healthcare NHS Trust
-
London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RJ
-
London, United Kingdom, WC1E 6JB
-
London, United Kingdom, E1 1BB.
-
London, United Kingdom, SE19 3ST
-
London, United Kingdom, SW10 9NH
- Chelsea and Westminster NHS Trust
-
Manchester, United Kingdom, M8 5RB
-
Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 0FH
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85012
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85025
-
-
California
-
Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90036
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90069
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90059
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95825
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94102
- Optimus Medical - ClinEdge - PPDS
-
San Leandro, California, United States, 94577
- Kaiser Permanente
-
-
Colorado
-
Denver, Colorado, United States, 80205
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20009
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20037
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20036
-
-
Florida
-
DeLand, Florida, United States, 32720
-
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33316
-
Fort Pierce, Florida, United States, 34982
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33133
-
Miami Beach, Florida, United States, 33139
-
Oakland Park, Florida, United States, 33306
-
Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803
-
Pensacola, Florida, United States, 32504
-
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33614
-
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33407
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30312
-
Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
-
Macon, Georgia, United States, 31201
-
Savannah, Georgia, United States, 31405
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60613
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60657
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21215
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
-
Springfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01105
-
-
Michigan
-
Berkley, Michigan, United States, 48072
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63139
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63108
-
-
New Jersey
-
Hillsborough, New Jersey, United States, 08844
-
Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07102
-
-
New York
-
Albany, New York, United States, 12208
-
Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
-
Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
-
New York, New York, United States, 10011
-
New York, New York, United States, 10011-4121
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
-
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27401
- Cone Health Regional Center for Infectious Disease
-
Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27858-4354
-
Huntersville, North Carolina, United States, 28078
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15212
- Allegheny Health Network
-
-
South Carolina
-
Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29203-6840
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
-
Bellaire, Texas, United States, 77401
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75202
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75215
- AIDS Arms Inc
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
- North Texas Infectious Diseases Consultants PA
-
Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76104
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77004
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77098
-
Longview, Texas, United States, 75605
-
-
Virginia
-
Annandale, Virginia, United States, 22003-7313
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
-
Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Antiretroviral treatment naive (≤ 10 days of prior therapy with any antiretroviral agent following a diagnosis of HIV-1 infection) except the use for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), up to one month prior to screening
- Plasma HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels ≥ 500 copies per milliliter (mL) at screening
- Adequate renal function: Estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 30 mL per minute (min) (≥ 0.50 mL per second (sec)) according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- An opportunistic illness indicative of stage 3 HIV diagnosed within the 30 days prior to screening
- Decompensated cirrhosis (eg, ascites, encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding)
- Current alcohol or substance use judged by the Investigator to potentially interfere with subject study compliance
- Females who are pregnant (as confirmed by positive serum pregnancy test)
- Females who are breastfeeding
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: B/F/TAF
B/F/TAF + DTG + F/TAF placebo administered without regard to food for at least 144 weeks.
|
50/200/25 milligrams (mg) FDC tablets administered orally, once daily
Other Names:
Tablets administered orally, once daily
Tablets administered orally, once daily
|
Active Comparator: DTG + F/TAF
DTG + F/TAF+ B/F/TAF placebo administered without regard to food for at least 144 weeks.
|
50 mg tablets administered orally, once daily
Other Names:
200/25 mg tablets administered orally, once daily
Other Names:
Tablets administered orally, once daily
|
Experimental: Open-label Phase B/F/TAF from B/F/TAF
After Week 144, participants will continue to take their blinded study drug and attend visits every 12 weeks until the End of Blinded Treatment Visit.
Following the End of Blinded Treatment Visit, participants will be given the option to receive open-label (OL) B/F/TAF for 96 weeks.
After the Week 96 OL Visit, participants in a country where B/F/TAF is not commercially available will be given the option to continue OL B/F/TAF until the product becomes accessible through an access program or until Gilead elects to discontinue the study in that country, whichever occurs first.
|
50/200/25 milligrams (mg) FDC tablets administered orally, once daily
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Open-label Phase B/F/TAF from DTG + F/TAF
After Week 144, participants will continue to take their blinded study drug and attend visits every 12 weeks until the End of Blinded Treatment Visit.
Following the End of Blinded Treatment Visit, participants will be given the option to receive OL B/F/TAF for 96 weeks.
After the Week 96 OL Visit, participants in a country where B/F/TAF is not commercially available will be given the option to continue OL B/F/TAF until the product becomes accessible through an access program or until Gilead elects to discontinue the study in that country, whichever occurs first.
|
50/200/25 milligrams (mg) FDC tablets administered orally, once daily
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Defined by the US FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 48
|
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
|
Week 48
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48
|
Baseline, Week 48
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96 as Defined by the US FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 96
|
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
|
Week 96
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 144 as Defined by the US FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 144
|
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 144 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
|
Week 144
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA < 20 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Defined by the US FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 48
|
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 20 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
|
Week 48
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA < 20 Copies/mL at Week 96 as Defined by the US FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 96
|
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 20 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
|
Week 96
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA < 20 Copies/mL at Week 144 as Defined by the US FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 144
|
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 20 copies/mL at Week 144 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
|
Week 144
|
Change From Baseline in log10 HIV-1 RNA at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48
|
Baseline, Week 48
|
|
Change From Baseline in log10 HIV-1 RNA at Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96
|
Baseline, Week 96
|
|
Change From Baseline in log10 HIV-1 RNA at Week 144
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 144
|
Baseline, Week 144
|
|
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96
|
Baseline, Week 96
|
|
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 144
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 144
|
Baseline, Week 144
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 Open-Label as Defined by Missing = Excluded Algorithm
Time Frame: Baseline, open-label Week 48
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL was analyzed using Missing = Excluded for imputing missing HIV-1 RNA values using the All B/F/TAF Analysis Set for the all B/F/TAF analysis.
All missing data was excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation).
The denominator for percentages at a visit was the number of participants in the all B/F/TAF analysis set with nonmissing HIV-1 RNA value at that visit.
|
Baseline, open-label Week 48
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 Open-Label as Defined by Missing = Failure Algorithm
Time Frame: Baseline, open-label Week 48
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL was analyzed using Missing = Failure for imputing missing HIV-1 RNA values using the All B/F/TAF Analysis Set for the all B/F/TAF analysis.
All missing data was treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.
The denominator for percentages was the number of participants in all B/F/TAF analysis set.
|
Baseline, open-label Week 48
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96 Open-Label as Defined by Missing = Excluded Algorithm
Time Frame: Baseline, open-label Week 96
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL was analyzed using Missing = Excluded for imputing missing HIV-1 RNA values using the All B/F/TAF Analysis Set for the all B/F/TAF analysis.
All missing data was excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation).
The denominator for percentages at a visit was the number of participants in the all B/F/TAF analysis set with nonmissing HIV-1 RNA value at that visit.
|
Baseline, open-label Week 96
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96 Open-Label as Defined by Missing = Failure Algorithm
Time Frame: Baseline, open-label Week 96
|
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL was analyzed using Missing = Failure for imputing missing HIV-1 RNA values using the All B/F/TAF Analysis Set for the all B/F/TAF analysis.
All missing data was treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL.
The denominator for percentages was the number of participants in all B/F/TAF analysis set.
|
Baseline, open-label Week 96
|
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 48 Open-Label
Time Frame: Baseline, open-label Week 48
|
Baseline, open-label Week 48
|
|
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 96 Open-Label
Time Frame: Baseline, open-label Week 96
|
Baseline, open-label Week 96
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Gupta SK, Post FA, Arribas JR, Eron JJ Jr, Wohl DA, Clarke AE, Sax PE, Stellbrink HJ, Esser S, Pozniak AL, Podzamczer D, Waters L, Orkin C, Rockstroh JK, Mudrikova T, Negredo E, Elion RA, Guo S, Zhong L, Carter C, Martin H, Brainard D, SenGupta D, Das M. Renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a pooled analysis of 26 clinical trials. AIDS. 2019 Jul 15;33(9):1455-1465. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002223.
- Sax PE, Pozniak A, Montes ML, Koenig E, DeJesus E, Stellbrink HJ, Antinori A, Workowski K, Slim J, Reynes J, Garner W, Custodio J, White K, SenGupta D, Cheng A, Quirk E. Coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide, for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (GS-US-380-1490): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017 Nov 4;390(10107):2073-2082. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32340-1. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
- Stellbrink HJ, Arribas JR, Stephens JL, Albrecht H, Sax PE, Maggiolo F, Creticos C, Martorell CT, Wei X, Acosta R, Collins SE, Brainard D, Martin H. Co-formulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet HIV. 2019 Jun;6(6):e364-e372. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30080-3. Epub 2019 May 5.
- Acosta RK, Willkom M, Martin R, Chang S, Wei X, Garner W, Lutz J, Majeed S, SenGupta D, Martin H, Quirk E, White KL. Resistance Analysis of Bictegravir-Emtricitabine-Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-1 Treatment-Naive Patients through 48 Weeks. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Apr 25;63(5):e02533-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02533-18. Print 2019 May.
- Acosta R, Willkom M, Martin R, Chang S, Liu X, Hedskog C, et al. Low-frequency resistance variants in art-naïve participants do not affect bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) triple therapy outcome. [Poster MOPEB242]. 10th IAS Conference on HIV Science (IAS 2019); 2019 July 21-24; Mexico City, Mexico.
- Johnson M, Taylor S, Wei X, Collins SE, Martin H. Hepatic Safety of Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide [Poster P061]. 25th Annual Conference of the British HIV Association; 2019 02-05 April; Bournemouth, United Kingdom.
- Gupta S, Mills A, Brinson C, Workowski K, Clarke A, Antinori A, et al. 96 Week Efficacy and Safety of B/F/TAF in Treatment-Naïve Adults and Adults ≥50 Years [Poster 502]. CROI 2019; 2019 04-07 March; Seattle, WA.
- Acosta R, White K, Garner W, Wei X, Andreatta K, Willkom M, et al. HIV-1 subtype (B or non-B) had no impact on the efficacy of B/F/TAF or resistance development in five phase 3 treatment-naïve or switch studies. [Poster THPEB077]. 22nd International AIDS Conference; 2018 July 23-27; Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- White K, Kulkarni R, Willkom M, Martin R, Chang S, Wei X, et al. Pooled week 48 efficacy and baseline resistance: B/F/TAF in treatment-naive patients. [Poster 532]. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2018 March 4-7; Boston, USA.
- Wohl D, Clarke A, Maggiolo F, Garner W, Laouri M, Martin H, Quirk E. Patient-Reported Symptoms Over 48 Weeks Among Participants in Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Non-inferiority Trials of Adults with HIV on Co-formulated Bictegravir, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide versus Co-formulated Abacavir, Dolutegravir, and Lamivudine. Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):561-573. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0322-8.
- Wohl DA, Yazdanpanah Y, Baumgarten A, Clarke A, Thompson MA, Brinson C, Hagins D, Ramgopal MN, Antinori A, Wei X, Acosta R, Collins SE, Brainard D, Martin H. Bictegravir combined with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet HIV. 2019 Jun;6(6):e355-e363. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30077-3. Epub 2019 May 5.
- Acosta R, Andreatta K, D'Antoni M, Collins S, Martin H, White K. HIV Viral Blips in Adults Treated with INSTI-Based Regimens Through 144 Weeks. [Poster 540]. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections 2020 (CROI 2020); 2020 March 8-11; Boston, Massachusetts.
- Mills A, Gupta SK, Brinson C, Workowski K, Clarke A, Antinori A, Stephens JL, et al. 144-Week Efficacy and Safety of B/F/TAF in Treatment-Naive Adults Age ≥50 Years. [Poster 477]. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections 2020 (CROI 2020); 2020 March 8-11; Boston, Massachusetts.
- Orkin C, DeJesus E, Sax PE, Arribas JR, Gupta SK, Martorell C, Stephens JL, Stellbrink HJ, Wohl D, Maggiolo F, Thompson MA, Podzamczer D, Hagins D, Flamm JA, Brinson C, Clarke A, Huang H, Acosta R, Brainard DM, Collins SE, Martin H; GS-US-380-1489; GS-US-380-1490 study investigators. Fixed-dose combination bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir-containing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: week 144 results from two randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trials. Lancet HIV. 2020 Jun;7(6):e389-e400. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30099-0.
- Ramgopal M, Maggiolo F, Ward D, Leboucche B, Rizzardini G, Molina JM, et al. Pooled Analysis of 4 International Trials of Bictegravir/Emtrictabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in Adults Aged ≥ 65 Years Demonstrating Safety and Efficacy: Week 48 Results. [Oral OAB0403].AIDS 2020; 2020 July 6-10; Virtual.
- Acosta R, Andreatta K, D'Antoni M, Collins S, Martin H, White K. Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) shows high efficacy in clinical study participants infected with HIV-1 subtype F. [Poster P124]. HIV Drug Therapy 2020 (HIV Glasgow 2020); 2020 October 5-8; Glasgow, United Kingdom.
- Acosta R, Chen G, Chang S, Martin R, Wang X, Huang H, et al. HIV with Transmitted Drug Resistance Is Durably Suppressed by B/F/TAF at Week 144. [Poster 430]. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections 2021 (CROI 2021); 2021 June 3-November 3; Virtual.
- Acosta RK, Chen GQ, Chang S, Martin R, Wang X, Huang H, Brainard D, Collins SE, Martin H, White KL. Three-year study of pre-existing drug resistance substitutions and efficacy of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in HIV-1 treatment-naive participants. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Jul 15;76(8):2153-2157. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab115.
- Workowski K, Orkin C, Sax P, Hagins D, Koenig E, Stephens JL, et al. Four-Year Outcomes of B/F/TAF in Treatment-Naïve Adults [Poster 415]. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections 2021 (CROI 2021); 2021 June 3-November 3; Virtual.
- Acosta R, Chen G, Qin L, Wang X, Huang H, Hindman J, et al. Achievement of Undetectable HIV-1 RNA in the B/F/TAF Treatment-Naïve Clinical Trials. [Poster PEB150]. 11th IAS Conference on HIV Science (IAS 2021); 2021 July 18-21; Virtual.
- Acosta R, Chen G, Huang H, Liu H, White K. Unreturned Pill Bottles in the 1489 and 1490 Clinical Trials: An Important Measure of Poor Adherence That Is Often Ignored in Pill Count Calculations. [Poster 902]. IDWeek 2021; 2021 September 29-October 3; Virtual.
- Arribas J, Orkin C, Maggiolo F, Antinori A, Lazzarin A, Yasdanpanah, et al. Long-term Analysis of B/F/TAF in Treatment-Naïve Adults Living With HIV Through Four Years of Follow-up. [PEB151]. 11th IAS Conference on HIV Science (IAS 2021); 2021 July 18-21; Virtual.
- Daar E, Orkin C, Sax P, Stephens J, Koenig E, Clarke A, et al. Incidence of Metabolic Complications Among Treatment-naïve Adults Living With HIV-1 Randomized to B/F/TAF, DTG/ABC/3TC or DTG+F/TAF After 3 Years. [Oral 69]. IDWeek 2021; 2021 September 29- October 3; Virtual.
- Pozniak A, et al. Outcomes 48 Weeks After Switching From DTG/ABC/3TC or DTG+F/TAF to B/F/TAF. [PE2/68]. 18th European AIDS Conference (EAC 2021), 2021 October 27-30; London, United Kingdom.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 11, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 12, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
July 5, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 16, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
November 18, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 7, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 10, 2022
Last Verified
February 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Antiviral Agents
- Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
- Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Anti-HIV Agents
- Anti-Retroviral Agents
- HIV Integrase Inhibitors
- Integrase Inhibitors
- Emtricitabine tenofovir alafenamide
- Dolutegravir
Other Study ID Numbers
- GS-US-380-1490
- 2015-003988-10 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Qualified external researchers may request IPD for this study after study completion.
For more information, please visit our website at https://www.gilead.com/science-and-medicine/research/clinical-trials-transparency-and-data-sharing-policy
IPD Sharing Time Frame
18 months after study completion
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
A secured external environment with username, password, and RSA code.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV-1 Infection
-
Sociedad Andaluza de Enfermedades InfecciosasConsejeria de Salud. Junta de Andalucia. SpainCompletedHIV Infection | HIV-1 InfectionSpain
-
Helios SaludViiV HealthcareUnknownHiv | HIV-1-infectionArgentina
-
Frontier Biotechnologies Inc.RecruitingHIV-1-infectionUnited States
-
University of ZurichActive, not recruitingHIV-1-infectionSwitzerland
-
MacroGenicsNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)CompletedHIV-1-infectionUnited States
-
Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades...Aelix TherapeuticsCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)CompletedHIV-1 InfectionUnited States
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanCompleted
-
Shanghai Public Health Clinical CenterUnknown
-
Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades...Completed
Clinical Trials on B/F/TAF
-
Gilead SciencesRecruitingHIV-1 InfectionUnited States, Thailand, Uganda, South Africa
-
Gilead SciencesCompletedHIV-1-infectionUnited States, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Thailand
-
Gilead SciencesRecruitingHIV-1-infectionUnited States, France, Canada
-
Tulika Singh, MDGilead SciencesRecruitingHIV-1-infectionUnited States
-
Shanghai Public Health Clinical CenterYunnan AIDS Care Center; Xixi Hospital of HangzhouActive, not recruiting
-
Gilead SciencesNot yet recruiting
-
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute...Not yet recruiting
-
Gilead SciencesCompleted
-
Gilead SciencesRecruiting
-
Gilead SciencesCompletedHIV-1-infectionUnited States, Puerto Rico, France, Germany, Austria, Canada