Cognitive Behavioral Effects on Sleep, Pain, and Cytokines in Gynecologic Cancer

June 13, 2023 updated by: University of Florida
Gynecologic cancers cause substantial morbidity and mortality among women. Developing, implementing, and disseminating interventions that reduce morbidity and mortality secondary to gynecologic cancers are a public health priority. In spite of this, there is a paucity of research examining the effects of psychosocial interventions on patient-centered and physiological outcomes in this population. To the extent that psychological factors may influence quality of life and tumor biology among women with gynecologic cancers, psychological interventions may represent an important adjunct to standard clinical care in this population. As such, this study will examine the effects of a psychosocial intervention on sleep, pain, mood, cortisol, and cytokines in women with gynecologic cancers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Gynecologic cancers cause substantial morbidity and mortality among women. Developing, implementing, and disseminating interventions that reduce morbidity and mortality secondary to gynecologic cancers are a public health priority. To the extent that psychological factors may influence quality of life and tumor biology among women with gynecologic cancers, psychological interventions may represent an important adjunct to standard clinical care in this population. Among individuals with cancer, there is emerging evidence that stressors and psychological responses to stressors activate central and peripheral stress systems, resulting in downstream effects on the tumor microenvironment, e.g. hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation, inflammatory/growth factor upregulation that may favor tumorigenesis. Little is known about whether psychological interventions may modulate biobehavioral factors that may promote tumorigenesis among women with gynecologic cancer. This is a significant gap in the literature. Sleep quality, pain, and mood are three patient-centered outcomes that may represent important intervention targets for women with gynecologic cancers, as insomnia, pain, and negative mood states are (1) prevalent and (2) have been associated with HPA dysregulation and inflammatory/growth factor upregulation in this population in empirical research. This study will examine cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention effects on patient centered and physiological outcomes among women with gynecologic cancers undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. Grounded within the Central Arousal Theory of Stress (CATS) and a biobehavioral model of tumor biology, the central hypothesis is that a CBT intervention targeting insomnia and pain will (a) improve nighttime sleep patterns, pain, and negative mood states, and (b) reduce cortisol levels, normalize daytime cortisol rhythm, and reduce proinflammatory/proangiogenic cytokine levels in women with gynecologic cancers. The multidisciplinary team will have research/clinical experience in psycho-oncology, psychoneuroimmunology (PNI), behavioral sleep medicine, pain, reproductive immunology, and gynecologic oncology. The research study is innovative in that it will (1) combine empirically-supported CBT techniques for insomnia and pain into a multicomponent intervention tailored for women with gynecologic cancers, and (2) examine CBT effects on central sensitization of pain among individuals with cancer using quantitative sensory testing (QST). The results of this research will be significant to public health initiatives, because although gynecologic cancers are among the leading causes of cancer-related death among women, there is a paucity of research examining the effects of psychosocial interventions on patient-centered and physiological outcomes in this population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32611
        • University of Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Women 18 and older scheduled and/ or have recently had a surgical resection, debulking, or cytoreduction for gynecologic malignancies for which adjuvant treatment or chemotherapy is the standard of care. Most of these cases are expected to be: (i) epithelial ovarian cancer, any stage, any grade, (ii) epithelial endometrial cancer, clear cell, papillary serous, or carcinosarcoma morphologies; any stage; any grade, (iii) epithelial endometrial cancer, endometrioid morphology; any stage any grade, (iv) fallopian tube cancer, any stage, any grade, (v) peritoneal cancer, any stage, any grade, or (vi) squamous cell carcinomas of the female genital tract (uterus, cervix, vulva, and vagina), any stage, any grade, in situ, or (vii) borderline ovarian tumors.
  • Endorsement of any of the following sleep related complaints in the month prior to enrollment (at pre- or post-surgery): difficulty initiating sleep, difficulty maintaining sleep, waking up too early, or sleep that is chronically nonrestorative or poor in quality.
  • During the two weeks of sleep evaluation at the post-surgical timepoint: sleep diary/clinical interview confirmed insomnia (e.g., sleep onset or awake time during the night > 30 minutes) at least 3 nights per week; or, sleep diary/clinical interview confirmed insomnia on 1 to 5 nights across the two weeks of evaluation plus Sleep Efficiency on Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at post-surgery < 85%.
  • Presence of daytime dysfunction due to insomnia (mood, cognitive, social, or occupational impairment) at post-surgery.
  • Able to read and understand English.
  • Willing to undergo randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent.
  • Current, severe, uncontrolled psychopathology that would make randomization to conditions unethical.
  • Past or current diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder or seizure disorder that would prevent the safe implementation of sleep restriction techniques.
  • Participation in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or any nonpharmacological treatment for sleep outside of the current study.
  • Sleep apnea or periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD).
  • Physician estimated survival less than 6 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
This group will receive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to optimize sleep, pain, and mood in women with gynecologic cancers. The therapy will be provided on a one-on-one basis, for 2 hours once a week for six weeks by a trained therapist with a master's degree in Clinical Psychology.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy is used to optimize sleep, pain, and mood in women with gynecologic cancers and will be provided 2 hours once a week for six weeks.
Placebo Comparator: Psychoeducation
This group will receive Psychoeducation which is aimed at providing information, resources, and non-specific support related to adapting well to cancer. The education will be provided on a one-on-one basis, for 2 hours once a week for six weeks by a trained therapist with a master's degree in Clinical Psychology.
Psychoeducation is used to provide information, resources, and non-specific support related to adapting well to cancer. Sessions will be provided 2 hours once a week for 6 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective Sleep Efficiency
Time Frame: Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)

Subjective Sleep Efficiency is assessed using daily Sleep Diaries.

Analyses will examine intervention effects on changes in Sleep Efficiency from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3.

Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)
Subjective Sleep Quality
Time Frame: Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)

Subjective Sleep Quality is assessed using daily Sleep Diaries.

Analyses will examine intervention effects on changes in Sleep Quality from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3.

Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)
Pain Quality and Intensity
Time Frame: Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)

Pain quality and intensity are assessed with the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Total Score.

Analyses will examine intervention effects on changes in pain severity from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3 while controlling for T0.

Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)
Pain Severity
Time Frame: Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)

Pain Severity is assessed using daily sleep Diaries.

Analyses will examine intervention effects on changes in Pain Severity from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3.

Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)
Pain Interference
Time Frame: Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)

Pain Interference is assessed with the Pain Disability Index (PDI).

Analyses will examine intervention effects on changes in Pain Disability from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3 while controlling for T0.

Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)
Serum Cortisol Concentrations
Time Frame: Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)

Serum Cortisol Concentrations are assessed with peripheral venous blood draw.

Analyses will examine intervention effects on changes in Serum Cortisol Concentrations from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3 controlling for T0.

Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)
Diurnal Salivary Cortisol Rhythm
Time Frame: Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)

Diurnal Salivary Cortisol Rhythm is assessed with saliva sampling.

Analyses will examine intervention effects on changes in Diurnal Salivary Cortisol Rhythm from T1 to T2 and T2 to T3 controlling for T0.

Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)
Serum Cytokine Concentrations
Time Frame: Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)

Cytokines are assessed by measuring serum concentrations of Interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-alpha, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF).

Analyses will examine intervention effects on changes in Cytokine Concentrations from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3 controlling for T0.

Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depressed Mood
Time Frame: Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)

Depressed Mood is assessed using the GRID-Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (GRID-HAMD).

Analyses will examine intervention effects on changes on GRID-HAMD scores from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3 controlling for T0.

Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)
Anxious Mood
Time Frame: Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)

Anxious mood is assessed via the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).

Analyses will examine intervention effects on changes on STAI State Anxiety scores from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3 controlling for T0.

Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)
A-Delta Nerve Fiber (First Pain) Response
Time Frame: Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)

This is assessed by measuring pain severity ratings in response to Graded Thermal Stimulation or RAMP and HOLD using Quantitative Sensory Testing.

Analyses will examine intervention effects on changes in pain severity ratings from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3.

Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)
C Nerve Fiber (Second Pain) Response
Time Frame: Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)

This is assessed by measuring pain severity ratings in response to a Thermal Protocol for Temporal Summation or Wind-Up using Quantitative Sensory Testing

Analyses will examine intervention effects on changes in pain severity ratings from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3.

Pre-surgery (T0, which is baseline), 6-8 weeks (T1, which is post-surgery and pre-intervention), 12-16 weeks (T2, which is post-intervention), and 18-24 weeks (T3, which is follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Deidre B. Pereira, PhD, University of Florida

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 18, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 2, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

November 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

3
Subscribe