Functional Significance of Complexity Measures in the Sensory-motor Behavior (NEURO COMP)

January 2, 2018 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Functional Significance of Complexity Measures in the Sensory-motor Behavior: Are There Potential Clinical Applications?

The main objective of this study is to compare between groups the level of complexity of the estimated sensorimotor performance through multi-fractal (minmaxMF-DFA) exponents.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The secondary objectives of this study are to compare the level of complexity of the estimated sensorimotor performance using the(A) mono-fractal exhibitors (the αDFA values) and the (B) coefficient of variation (CV) between groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie
      • Montpellier, France, 34090
        • Laboratoire Movement to Health (M2H), Euromov, Université Montpellier 1
      • Nîmes Cedex 09, France, 30029
        • CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The subject does not practice music intensively (<1h / day on average)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is participating in another study
  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The patient is under judicial protection, or under guardianship
  • The patient refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
  • The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
  • The subject regularly practices music
  • The subject is suffering from a neurodegenerative disease of the central or peripheral nervous system which may affect the sensorimotor control of rhythmic movements of the upper limb
  • The subject has had a recent trauma of the upper limb
  • The subject is suffering from uncorrected visual and hearing impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control group

Subjects randomized to this group will have a tapping test with no sensory blocking.

Intervention: Tapping test

Subjects will be placed at a table in a sitting position where they will perform a rhythmic finger tapping test. The seat height is adjusted so that the front dominant arm rests comfortably on the table. Subjects will be equipped with headphones to receive auditory signals during a first synchronized phase of tapping.

After the last auditory signal, participants will continue the tapping task by themselves as directed: "after the metronome stops,continue tapping the prescribed tempo as accurately and consistently as possible throughout the test." The movements of the index finger will be measured by a single-axis accelerometer (15 × 15 mm) attached to the nail.

Experimental: Wrist anesthesia

Subjects randomized to this group will have an axillary block / regional anesthesia followed by a tapping test.

Intervention: Wrist anesthesia

Intervention: Tapping test

Subjects will be placed at a table in a sitting position where they will perform a rhythmic finger tapping test. The seat height is adjusted so that the front dominant arm rests comfortably on the table. Subjects will be equipped with headphones to receive auditory signals during a first synchronized phase of tapping.

After the last auditory signal, participants will continue the tapping task by themselves as directed: "after the metronome stops,continue tapping the prescribed tempo as accurately and consistently as possible throughout the test." The movements of the index finger will be measured by a single-axis accelerometer (15 × 15 mm) attached to the nail.

Prior to the tapping test, regional anesthesia is performed in the form of sensory blocks distal to the wrist: injection of ropivacaine 7.5mg / ml is carried out successively in contact with three nerves (ulnar, median and radial) with a volume of 2 ml for nerve, for a total of 45mg.
Experimental: Wrist anesthesia, masked

Subjects randomized to this group will have an axillary block / regional anesthesia, will wear a blinding mask, and then will perform a tapping test.

Intervention: Wrist anesthesia

Intervention: Blinding mask

Intervention: Tapping test

Subjects will be placed at a table in a sitting position where they will perform a rhythmic finger tapping test. The seat height is adjusted so that the front dominant arm rests comfortably on the table. Subjects will be equipped with headphones to receive auditory signals during a first synchronized phase of tapping.

After the last auditory signal, participants will continue the tapping task by themselves as directed: "after the metronome stops,continue tapping the prescribed tempo as accurately and consistently as possible throughout the test." The movements of the index finger will be measured by a single-axis accelerometer (15 × 15 mm) attached to the nail.

Prior to the tapping test, regional anesthesia is performed in the form of sensory blocks distal to the wrist: injection of ropivacaine 7.5mg / ml is carried out successively in contact with three nerves (ulnar, median and radial) with a volume of 2 ml for nerve, for a total of 45mg.
Patients will don a mask that prevents them from seeing during the tapping test.
Experimental: Wrist anesthesia, helmet

Subjects randomized to this group will have an axillary block / regional anesthesia, will wear an anti-noise helmet, and then will perform a tapping test.

Intervention: Wrist anesthesia

Intervention: Anti-noise helmet

Intervention: Tapping test

Subjects will be placed at a table in a sitting position where they will perform a rhythmic finger tapping test. The seat height is adjusted so that the front dominant arm rests comfortably on the table. Subjects will be equipped with headphones to receive auditory signals during a first synchronized phase of tapping.

After the last auditory signal, participants will continue the tapping task by themselves as directed: "after the metronome stops,continue tapping the prescribed tempo as accurately and consistently as possible throughout the test." The movements of the index finger will be measured by a single-axis accelerometer (15 × 15 mm) attached to the nail.

Prior to the tapping test, regional anesthesia is performed in the form of sensory blocks distal to the wrist: injection of ropivacaine 7.5mg / ml is carried out successively in contact with three nerves (ulnar, median and radial) with a volume of 2 ml for nerve, for a total of 45mg.
Patients will don a helmet that prevents them from hearing during the tapping test.
Experimental: Wrist anesthesia, masked & helmet

Subjects randomized to this group will have an axillary block / regional anesthesia, will wear a blinding mask, will wear an anti-noise helmet, and then will perform a tapping test.

Intervention: Wrist anesthesia

Intervention: Blinding mask

Intervention: Anti-noise helmet

Intervention: Tapping test

Subjects will be placed at a table in a sitting position where they will perform a rhythmic finger tapping test. The seat height is adjusted so that the front dominant arm rests comfortably on the table. Subjects will be equipped with headphones to receive auditory signals during a first synchronized phase of tapping.

After the last auditory signal, participants will continue the tapping task by themselves as directed: "after the metronome stops,continue tapping the prescribed tempo as accurately and consistently as possible throughout the test." The movements of the index finger will be measured by a single-axis accelerometer (15 × 15 mm) attached to the nail.

Prior to the tapping test, regional anesthesia is performed in the form of sensory blocks distal to the wrist: injection of ropivacaine 7.5mg / ml is carried out successively in contact with three nerves (ulnar, median and radial) with a volume of 2 ml for nerve, for a total of 45mg.
Patients will don a mask that prevents them from seeing during the tapping test.
Patients will don a helmet that prevents them from hearing during the tapping test.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
minmaxMF-DFA value during the tapping test
Time Frame: Day 0
The level of complexity of the estimated sensorimotor performance as measured by the multi-fractal exponents.
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coefficient of variation
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
αDFA value during the tapping test
Time Frame: Day 0
The level of complexity of the estimated sensorimotor performance as measured by the single-fractal exponent.
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kjerstin Torre, MD, PhD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 6, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LOCAL/2014/ADKT-001
  • 2014-A01257-40 (Other Identifier: RCB number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Volunteers

Clinical Trials on Tapping test

3
Subscribe