Pragmatic Trial of Video Education in Nursing Homes (PROVEN)

September 16, 2020 updated by: Vincent Mor, Brown University

PROVEN: Pragmatic Trial of Video Education in Nursing Homes

This is a pragmatic cluster-randomized control trial (RCT) of an Advance Care Planning (ACP) Video Program for nursing home (NH) patients ≥ 65 years old who are cared for in 360 NH facilities (intervention arm n=119; control arm n=241) within two NH health care systems: Genesis HealthCare and PruittHealth. The intervention NH facilities will implement the ACP Video Program, while the control NH facilities will follow their usual ACP procedures. The trial will evaluate the effectiveness of the ACP Video Program by comparing hospitalizations, advance directives, and hospice use in the intervention vs. control NHs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Nursing homes are complex health care systems that serve increasingly sick patients who have advanced comorbid conditions. NHs are often charged with guiding patients through decisions about the direction of their treatment. Patients at NHs commonly get aggressive care that may be inconsistent with their preferences and of little clinical benefit. Identifying effective approaches that NHs can use to better promote goal-directed care and optimize resources is a research, public health, and clinical priority.

Advance care planning is the most consistent modifiable factor associated with better palliative care outcomes. Traditional ACP relies on verbal descriptions of hypothetical health states and treatments. This approach is limited because complex scenarios are difficult to envision, counseling is inconsistent, and verbal explanations are hindered by literacy and language barriers.

To address these shortcomings, the PROVEN project has developed video-assisted ACP decision-support tools that have shown efficacy in small randomized controlled trials. While several large health care systems have begun to adopt the videos, efforts have not rigorously evaluated outcomes-a critical step prior to widespread implementation.

The goal of PROVEN is to conduct a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the ACP Video Program in the NH setting by partnering with 2 large health care systems that operate 456 nursing homes nationwide. This work has the potential to improve the care provided to millions of older Americans in nursing homes and enable future pragmatic trials in this setting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

197692

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Norcross, Georgia, United States, 30093
        • PruittHealth
    • Pennsylvania
      • Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, United States, 19348
        • Genesis Healthcare

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Facilities are within Genesis HealthCare or PruittHealth health care systems
  • Facilities have facility identifiers that indicate that they are Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing facilities in the U.S.
  • Facilities serve both short and long-stay patients
  • Facilities have >50 beds
  • Facilities have an electronic medical records system
  • Facilities had at least 20 admissions and 20 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (regardless of whether they were discharged alive) in 2013

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Facilities excluded per corporate leaders in health care system because of recent turnover in NH administrator or Director of Nursing
  • Facilities excluded per corporate leaders in health care system because of recent bad state or federal quality assurance survey (e.g. restriction on admissions, levied large civil monetary penalty, etc.)
  • Facilities excluded per corporate leaders in health care system because of current new initiatives/competing demands

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ACP Video Program
Facility asked to implement ACP Video Program
The ACP Video Program consists of five videos that address ACP decisions: (1) General Goals of Care, (2) Goals of Care for Advanced Dementia, (3) Hospice, (4) Hospitalization, and (5) ACP for Healthy Patients. NH staff will offer videos to patients at these clinical triggers: (1) Within 7 days of admission or readmission; (2) Every 6 months for long-stay patients; (3) When there is a significant change in clinical status; (4) When a treatment decision arises for which there is a specific video; and (5) Special circumstances when goals of care are being considered (e.g., family visiting).
No Intervention: Usual ACP procedures
Facility follows usual ACP procedures

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Transfer Rate in Target Cohort
Time Frame: 12-month observation period
Number of hospital transfers (number of transfers/person-days alive) over a 12-month observation period among Medicare fee-for-service long-stay residents (in a NH >=90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have EITHER advanced dementia or advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease
12-month observation period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Transfer Rate Among Long-stay Residents Without Advanced Illness
Time Frame: 12-month observation period
Number of hospital transfers (number of transfers/person-days alive) over a 12-month observation period among Medicare fee-for-service long-stay residents (in a NH >=90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have NEITHER advanced dementia NOR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease
12-month observation period
Hospital Transfer Rate Among Short-stay Residents With Advanced Illness
Time Frame: 100-day observation period
Number of hospital transfers (number of transfers/person-days alive) over a 100-day observation period among Medicare fee-for-service short-stay residents (in a NH <90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have EITHER advanced dementia OR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease
100-day observation period
Hospital Transfer Rate Among Short-stay Residents Without Advanced Illness
Time Frame: 100-day observation period
Number of hospital transfers (number of transfers/person-days alive) over a 100-day observation period among Medicare fee-for-service short-stay residents (in a NH <90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have NEITHER advanced dementia NOR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease
100-day observation period
Proportion of Target Cohort With Last Observed Advance Directive Status
Time Frame: 12-month observation period
Proportion of long-stay residents (in a NH >=90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have EITHER advanced dementia OR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease whose last observed advance directive status during their 12-month observation period was: Full Code, Do Not Resuscitate (NOT Do Not Hospitalize), or Do Not Hospitalize. A resident whose last observed status was both Do Not Resuscitate and Do Not Hospitalize is categorized as Do Not Hospitalize only. Analyses will be limited to Genesis HealthCare facilities in which >75% of residents have any advance directive because the remaining Genesis HealthCare and PruittHealth facilities do not have reliable sources for these data.
12-month observation period
Proportion of Long-stay Residents Without Advanced Illness With Last Observed Advance Directive Status
Time Frame: 12-month observation period
Proportion of long-stay residents (in a NH >=90 days) who are >=65 years old and who do have NEITHER advanced dementia NOR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease whose last observed advance directive status during their 12-month observation period was: Full Code, Do Not Resuscitate (NOT Do Not Hospitalize), or Do Not Hospitalize. A resident whose last observed status was both Do Not Resuscitate and Do Not Hospitalize is categorized as Do Not Hospitalize only. Analyses will be limited to Genesis HealthCare facilities in which >75% of residents have any advance directive because the remaining Genesis HealthCare and PruittHealth facilities do not have reliable sources for these data.
12-month observation period
Proportion of Short-stay Residents With Advanced Illness With Last Observed Advance Directive Status
Time Frame: 100-day observation period
Proportion of short-stay residents (in a NH <90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have EITHER advanced dementia OR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease whose last observed advance directive status during their 100-day observation period was: Full Code, Do Not Resuscitate (NOT Do Not Hospitalize), or Do Not Hospitalize. A resident whose last observed status was both Do Not Resuscitate and Do Not Hospitalize is categorized as Do Not Hospitalize only. Analyses will be limited to Genesis HealthCare facilities in which >75% of residents have any advance directive because the remaining Genesis HealthCare and PruittHealth facilities do not have reliable sources for these data.
100-day observation period
Proportion of Short-stay Residents Without Advanced Illness With Last Observed Advance Directive Status
Time Frame: 100-day observation period
Proportion of short-stay residents (in a NH <90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have NEITHER advanced dementia NOR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease whose last observed advance directive status during their 100-day observation period was: Full Code, Do Not Resuscitate (NOT Do Not Hospitalize), or Do Not Hospitalize. A resident whose last observed status was both Do Not Resuscitate and Do Not Hospitalize is categorized as Do Not Hospitalize only. Analyses will be limited to Genesis HealthCare facilities in which >75% of residents have any advance directive because the remaining Genesis HealthCare and PruittHealth facilities do not have reliable sources for these data.
100-day observation period
Proportion of Target Cohort Receiving Any Burdensome Treatment
Time Frame: 12-month observation period
Proportion of long-stay residents (in a NH >=90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have EITHER advanced dementia OR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease who receive any burdensome treatment (new feeding tube insertions, parenteral therapy, intubation, ICU care) during a 12-month observation period
12-month observation period
Proportion of Long-stay Residents Without Advanced Illness Receiving Any Burdensome Treatment
Time Frame: 12-month observation period
Proportion of long-stay residents (in a NH >=90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have NEITHER advanced dementia NOR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease who receive any burdensome treatment (new feeding tube insertions, parenteral therapy, intubation, ICU care) during a 12-month observation period
12-month observation period
Proportion of Short-stay Residents With Advanced Illness Receiving Any Burdensome Treatment
Time Frame: 100-day observation period
Proportion of short-stay residents (in a NH <90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have EITHER advanced dementia OR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease who receive any burdensome treatment (new feeding tube insertions, parenteral therapy, intubation, ICU care) during a 100-day observation period among
100-day observation period
Proportion of Short-stay Residents Without Advanced Illness Receiving Any Burdensome Treatment
Time Frame: 100-day observation period
Proportion of short-stay residents (in a NH <90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have NEITHER advanced dementia NOR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease who receive any burdensome treatment (new feeding tube insertions, parenteral therapy, intubation, ICU care) during a 100-day observation period
100-day observation period
Proportion of Target Cohort With Any Hospice Enrollment
Time Frame: 12-month observation period
Proportion of long-stay residents (in a NH >=90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have EITHER advanced dementia OR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease with any hospice enrollment during a 12-month observation period
12-month observation period
Proportion of Long-stay Residents Without Advanced Illness With Any Hospice Enrollment
Time Frame: 12-month observation period
Proportion of long-stay residents (in a NH >=90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have NEITHER advanced dementia NOR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease with any hospice enrollment during a 12-month observation period
12-month observation period
Proportion of Short-stay Residents With Advanced Illness With Any Hospice Enrollment
Time Frame: 100-day observation period
Proportion of short-stay residents (in a NH <90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have EITHER advanced dementia OR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease with any hospice enrollment during a 100-day observation period
100-day observation period
Proportion of Short-stay Residents Without Advanced Illness With Any Hospice Enrollment
Time Frame: 100-day observation period
Proportion of short-stay residents (in a NH <90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have NEITHER advanced dementia NOR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease with any hospice enrollment during a 100-day observation period
100-day observation period
Proportion of Target Cohort That Has Medicare ACP Billing Codes
Time Frame: 12-month observation period
Proportion of long-stay residents (in a NH >=90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have EITHER advanced dementia OR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease who have any Medicare ACP billing code during their 12-month observation period
12-month observation period
Proportion of Long-stay Residents Without Advanced Illness That Has Medicare ACP Billing Codes
Time Frame: 12-month observation period
Proportion of long-stay residents (in a NH >=90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have NEITHER advanced dementia NOR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease who have any Medicare ACP billing code during their 12-month observation period
12-month observation period
Proportion of Short-stay Residents With Advanced Illness That Has Medicare ACP Billing Codes
Time Frame: 100-day observation period
Proportion of short-stay residents (in a NH <90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have EITHER advanced dementia OR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease who have any Medicare ACP billing code during their 100-day observation period
100-day observation period
Proportion of Short-stay Residents Without Advanced Illness That Has Medicare ACP Billing Codes
Time Frame: 100-day observation period
Proportion of short-stay residents (in a NH <90 days) who are >=65 years old and who have NEITHER advanced dementia NOR advanced congestive heart failure/chronic obstructive lung disease who have any Medicare ACP billing code during their 100-day observation period
100-day observation period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vincent Mor, PhD, Brown University
  • Principal Investigator: Susan Mitchell, MD, MPH, Hebrew SeniorLife
  • Principal Investigator: Angelo Volandes, MD, MPH, Massachusetts General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on ACP Video Program

Subscribe