Cervical Ripening Balloon in Induction of Labour at Term (CRBII)

August 14, 2018 updated by: Tagore Shephali, KK Women's and Children's Hospital

Cervical Ripening Balloon in Induction of Labour at Term (CRBII) - A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

About 1 in 6 deliveries in KKH are induced with prostaglandins. Inpatient induction can be a lengthy process especially when cervical priming is required. Although mechanical method of induction of labour (IOL) is established, its use in Singapore is uncommon. Systematic reviews comparing mechanical method against pharmacological and surgical IOL showed that mechanical method has similar efficacy with lower risk profile. As IOL is a common obstetric procedure, a revisit on the techniques is warranted. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial concluded that both cervical ripening balloon and prostaglandin are effective and complementary methods for IOL in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies, but did not examined the effects of pain.

The investigators propose to evaluate the adverse events in the 12 hours after CRB or 1st prostaglandin insertion, its efficiency in term singleton IOL in Singapore context and test the acceptability of women in Singapore in using the CRB as an alternative method of induction of labour while using a non-incremental balloon filling regime. Currently, there is no efficient method of induction that can be used safely in an outpatient setting. Through this study, the investigators hope to show that there are no major adverse events in the 12h after patients are induced with CRB, this potentially supports outpatient IOL with CRB which can reduce hospitalisation and medical costs. A non-incremental balloon filling regime will decrease time delays and may increase patient satisfaction during its use in induction of labour.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a prospective cohort randomised controlled trial conducted at the KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH) and University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC).

NICE guidelines on induction of labour defined uterine hyperstimulation as contractions more than 5 in 10 mins for more then 20 mins or contractions lasting more than 2 mins in duration. A retrospective study involving prostaglandin induction of labour showed that hyperstimulation occurred in 5.8% of cases. The sample size is calculated based on a 4.8% reduction in hyperstimulation in all induction of labour by CRB. At a level of significance of 5%, 80% power, 200 patients in each arm is required. Preliminary study by Tan TL et al had a dropout rate of 4.6%. Hence the proposed sample size is 420.

The investigators plan to collaborate on a multi-centre trial with the University Malaya Medical Centre. In which, each centre will recruit 210 patients for the study.

Randomization of the participants is achieved with third party sealed envelope allocation. 210 envelopes containing CRB allocation and another 210 identical envelopes containing prostin allocation will be prepared by a third party. The 420 envelops will be shuffled according to a computer randomisation code after sealing and labelled with a randomization allocation number from 1 to 420. The 210 envelops will then be handed to the each centre's PI, and will be kept in the clinical store on labour ward together with the stock of CRB and prostin.

Unfortunately, it is not possible to blind the allocation to the investigator or the patient. The investigator however has no part in observing any adverse events, the CTGs should be interpreted by the attending clinician and vet by team to avoid missing abnormal CTG. The patient herself will have to report contractions and pain scores and satisfaction scores with validated standard pain and satisfaction assessment tools to minimise the potential bias. The allocation will also be omitted from the database so as to blind the analyst in order to prevent manipulation.

There will be no additional clinic visit or labour ward admission required by the study. The potential patient receiving subsidized obstetric care who require elective IOL at term will be will be identified by doctors and clinical research coordinator in the subsidized clinic or labour ward or obstetric subsidized wards, and screened accordingly with inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria: Pregnant women aged 21 - 40 years old, singleton pregnancy, no major fetal anomaly, planned induction of labour at 37+0 weeks to 41+6 weeks gestation, vaginal delivery is appropriate, patient able to give informed consent to participate in the trial

Exclusion criteria: Spontaneous labour at start of planned induction, Bishop score <6 and cervical dilatation >=3 cm at start of induction, confirmed rupture of membrane, abnormal CTG at start of induction, caesarean section delivery is indicated, scarred uterus such as previous caesarean section, malpresentation in labour, patient withdraw consent to participate in the trial. Latex allergy, severe asthma and glaucoma.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

417

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore
        • KK Women's and Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 38 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women aged 21 - 40 years old
  • Singleton pregnancy with no major fetal anomaly
  • Planned induction of labour at 37+0 weeks to 41+6 weeks gestation
  • Vaginal delivery is appropriate
  • Patient able to give informed consent to participate in the trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spontaneous labour at start of planned induction
  • Bishop score <6 and cervical dilatation >=3 cm at start of induction
  • Confirmed rupture of membrane
  • Abnormal CTG at start of induction
  • Caesarean section delivery is indicated
  • Scarred uterus such as previous caesarean section
  • Malpresentation in labour
  • Latex allergy, severe asthma and glaucoma
  • Patient withdraw consent to participate in the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cervical Ripening Balloon
Cook® Cervical Ripening Balloon with Stylet Order number G19891 Reference Part Number J-CRBS-184000 Catheter (Fr) 18.0 Length (cm) 40 Balloon Volume (mL) 80
Cook® Cervical Ripening Balloon with Stylet Order number G19891 Reference Part Number J-CRBS-184000 Catheter (Fr) 18.0 Length (cm) 40 Balloon Volume (mL) 80
Active Comparator: Prostin
Prostin E2 vaginal tablets contain the active ingredient dinoprostone, which is a naturally occuring female hormone also known as prostaglandin E2. Prostaglandins are involved in naturally starting labour. Dose of Prostin is 3 mg vaginally.
Prostin E2 vaginal tablets contain the active ingredient dinoprostone, which is a naturally occuring female hormone also known as prostaglandin E2. Prostaglandins are involved in naturally starting labour. Dose of Prostin is 3 mg vaginally.
Other Names:
  • Prostin E2 vaginal tablets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Adverse events in the first 12 hours after Cook's Cervical Ripening Balloon insertion for induction of labour, in comparison to 1st prostin insertion
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after induction of labour
Up to 24 hours after induction of labour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of Cook's Cervical Ripening Balloonas a devide for induction of labour, in comparison to prostin, in achieving vaginal deliveries
Time Frame: Up to 96 hours after delivery
Up to 96 hours after delivery
Patient satisfaction of the Cook's Cervical Ripening Balloon as a devide for induction of labour, in comparison to prostin, by using a 10-point scale
Time Frame: From induction of labour to up to 4 days after delivery
Score 1 for poor and score 10 for excellent
From induction of labour to up to 4 days after delivery
Patients' experience of the Cook's Cervical Ripening Balloon as a devide for induction of labour, in comparison to prostin, by using a 10-point pain assessment scale
Time Frame: From induction of labour to up to 4 days after delivery
Score 1 for no pain, score 3 for pain similar insertion of IV access line, and score 8 for labour pain at time of request for epidural or labour if no epidural is used
From induction of labour to up to 4 days after delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shephali Tagore, MRCOG, KK Women's and Children's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 7, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 7, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015/2730

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy

Clinical Trials on Cervical Ripening Balloon

3
Subscribe