Collagen Matrix With Tunnel Technique Compared to CTG for the Treatment of Periodontal Recessions

December 16, 2015 updated by: Lukasz Gilowski, Medical University of Silesia

Collagen Matrix With Tunnel Technique Compared to CTG for the Treatment of Periodontal Recessions - Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of dental root coverage using the tunnel technique with connective tissue graft (CTG) and the same technique with collagen matrix for treatment of multiple gingival recessions Miller Class I and II.

This study is a randomized-controlled clinical trial of 6 months duration.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

According to the medical databases, there are limited randomized clinical trials comparing xenogenic collagen matrix and CTG used with the tunnel technique. The collagen matrix is a possible alternative to connective tissue graft.

The purpose of this clinical study is to compare short-term (3-6 months) outcomes of a root coverage using the tunnel technique with the collagen matrix and the same technique with CTG for the treatment of multiple recessions Miller class I and II.

Twenty eight patients are enrolled in the study. Patients in the test group are treated with xenogenic collagen matrix using the tunnel technique whereas patients in the control group with CTG. Clinical recordings are obtained at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. The percentage of average recession coverage (ARC) is evaluated after 3 and 6 months after the surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zabrze, Poland, 41-800
        • Department of Periodontal and Oral Mucosa Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of minimum two adjacent periodontal recessions Miller class I or II and at least 2 mm recessions depth.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Approximal Plaque Index (API) > 15%,
  • Sulcus Bleeding Index (SBI) > 10%,
  • Systemic diseases with compromised healing potential or infectious diseases,
  • Untreated periodontal conditions,
  • Pregnant and lactating females.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
Surgery:The tunnel technique for covering gingival recession. Graft: connective tissue.
The surgery starts with the sulcular incisions in the region of recessions, which enable access for the supraperiosteal preparation. The procedure is extended into the mucosal tissue using the tunneling knives. The partial-thickness flap is performed at the buccal site. Only the papillary regions are fully detached with the periosteum. The graft is placed into the tunnel and stabilized with absorbable sutures.The mobilized mucous flap is advanced coronally and stabilized with non-absorbable suspensory sutures.
Active Comparator: Study group
Surgery:The tunnel technique for covering gingival recession.Graft: xenogenic collagen matrix (Mucoderm).
The surgery starts with the sulcular incisions in the region of recessions, which enable access for the supraperiosteal preparation. The procedure is extended into the mucosal tissue using the tunneling knives. The partial-thickness flap is performed at the buccal site. Only the papillary regions are fully detached with the periosteum. The graft is placed into the tunnel and stabilized with absorbable sutures.The mobilized mucous flap is advanced coronally and stabilized with non-absorbable suspensory sutures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time Frame: 6 months
Distance from the cemento enamel junction to the deepest point of the gingival sulcus
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recession depth (RD)
Time Frame: 6 months
Distance from the mid-facial point of the cemento-enamel junction to the free gingival margin
6 months
Recession width (RW)
Time Frame: 6 months
Recession width horizontally at cemento-enamel junction level
6 months
Width of keratinized tissue (KTW)
Time Frame: 6 months
Distance from the mucogingival junction to the gingival margin
6 months
Recession area (RA)
Time Frame: 6 months
The area of a triangle with a width of recession as the base and a depth of the recession as the height.
6 months
the average percentage of root coverage (ARC)
Time Frame: 6 months
The percentage of covered recession area.
6 months
The complete coverage of recessions (CRC)
Time Frame: 6 months
The percentage rate of patients with complete coverage of all recessions (CRC)
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The depth of gingival sulcus (PD)
Time Frame: 6 months
Distance from the gingival margin to the deepest point of gingival sulcus
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Marta Tanasiewicz, Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry with Endodontics

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 16, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 18, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingival Recession

Clinical Trials on Surgery:The tunnel technique for covering gingival recession

Subscribe