The Clinical Comparison of Senofilcon A and Stenfilcon A Contact Lenses

July 20, 2017 updated by: Coopervision, Inc.
The objective of this study is to compare the clinical performance of senofilcon A lens with the stenfilcon A lens each for one week of daily disposable wear.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of this bilateral cross-over study is to evaluate the clinical performance of senofilcon A lens with the stenfilcon A lens. In particular, the study will focus on ocular physiology, lens fit, lens surface, visual acuity, and subjective response.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9PL
        • Eurolens Research - The University of Manchester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

Subjects will only be eligible for the study if:

  • They are of legal age (18) and capacity to volunteer.
  • They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
  • They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
  • They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of this study.
  • They have a contact lens spherical prescription between -1.00 to - 6.00D (inclusive)
  • They have a spectacle cylindrical correction of -0.75D or less in each eye.
  • At dispensing, they can attain at least 0.10 logMAR distance high contrast visual acuity in each eye with the study lenses within the available power range.
  • They currently use soft contact lenses or have done so in the previous six months.
  • They are willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least six days per week and for at least eight hours per day).

Exclusion criteria

Subjects will not be eligible to take part in the study if:

  • They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
  • They have had cataract surgery.
  • They have had corneal refractive surgery.
  • They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
  • They are pregnant or lactating.
  • They have any ocular abnormality which would, in the opinion of the investigator, normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • They have any infectious disease which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or they have any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
  • They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.
  • They currently wear either MyDay (daily) or the Acuvue Oasys (2 weekly) lens.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Senofilcon A
Participants were randomized to wear senofilcon A lens pair for one week during the crossover study.
contact lens
Active Comparator: Stenfilcon A
Participants were randomized to wear stenfilcon A lens pair for one week during the crossover study.
contact lens

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ocular Physiology
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 week
Ocular physiology assessment of senofilcon A and stenfilcon A lenses by biomicroscopy for the following: corneal staining, conjunctival hyperaemia, limbal hyperaemia, and conjunctival staining. Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=normal, 4=severe.
Baseline and 1 week
Overall Subjective Score of Lenses
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 week
Subjective responses will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor, 100=excellent.
Baseline and 1 week
Comfort
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 week
Subjective responses for comfort will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=causes pain, cannot be tolerated, 100=excellent, cannot be felt.
Baseline and 1 week
Dryness
Time Frame: 1 week
Subjective responses for dryness will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor, high levels of dryness, 100=excellent, no dryness.
1 week
Vision
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 week
Subjective responses for vision will be evaluated for each pair using questionnaire. Scale 0-100, 0=unacceptable, lens cannot be worn, 100=excellent.
Baseline and 1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Horizontal Centration
Time Frame: Baseline
Lens fit, horizontal centration will be assessed for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A at baseline for the following regions: extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely nasal
Baseline
Horizontal Centration
Time Frame: 1 Week
Lens fit, horizontal centration, will be assessed for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A at 1 week for the following regions: extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely nasal
1 Week
Vertical Centration
Time Frame: Baseline
Lens fit, vertical centration, will be assessed for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A at baseline for the following regions: extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely nasal
Baseline
Vertical Centration
Time Frame: 1 Week
Lens fit, vertical centration, will be assessed for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A at 1 week for the following regions: extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely nasal
1 Week
Lens Movement
Time Frame: Baseline
Lens movement assessed for stenfilcon A and senofilcon A at baseline using the following evaluations: extremely inadequate, slightly inadequate, optimum, slightly excessive, extremely excessive.
Baseline
Lens Movement
Time Frame: 1 Week
Lens movement assessed for stenfilcon A and senofilcon A at 1 week using the following evaluations: extremely inadequate, slightly inadequate, optimum, slightly excessive, extremely excessive.
1 Week
Visual Acuity
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 week
Measurement of visual acuity (VA) for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A assessed at baseline and 1 week using logMAR VA chart.
Baseline and 1 week
Lens Surface - Deposition
Time Frame: Baseline
Lens surface for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at baseline. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Baseline
Lens Surface - Deposition
Time Frame: 1 week
Lens surface for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at 1 week. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
1 week
Lens Surface - Debris
Time Frame: Baseline
Lens debris for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at baseline. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Baseline
Lens Surface - Debris
Time Frame: 1 week
Lens debris for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at 1 week. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
1 week
Lens Surface - Wettability
Time Frame: Baseline
Lens wettability for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at baseline. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Baseline
Lens Surface - Wettability
Time Frame: 1 week
Lens wettability for senofilcon A and stenfilcon A is assessed at 1 week. Grades 0-4, 0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carole Maldonado-Codinal, PhD, Eurolens Research, University of Manchester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EX-MKTG-62

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia

Clinical Trials on Senofilcon A

3
Subscribe