Comparison of the Videolaryngoscopes With Manual In-line Stabilization

November 4, 2018 updated by: Go Un Roh, Ajou University School of Medicine

Comparison of the McGrath Videolaryngoscope and the Pentax-AWS With the Macintosh Laryngoscope for Nasotracheal Intubation in Patients With Manual In-line Stabilization

Videolaryngoscope is useful to improve the laryngeal view, especially during difficult intubation. There are several kinds of videolaryngoscopes and it is applicable during nasotracheal intubation. In this study, the investigators will compare the McGrath videolaryngoscope and Pentax-AWS with Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with manual in-line stabilization.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • oral or maxillofacial surgery
  • ASA class I, II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • anticipated difficult intubation
  • necessity for rapid sequence induction
  • cervical spine injury
  • bleeding tendency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: McGrath Group
MgGrath videolaryngoscope will be used for nasotracheal intubation with MILS
MILS(Manual in-line stabilization) will be applied during intubation. With MILS, different kinds of laryngoscope will be evaluated in a simulated difficult airway.
McGrath videolaryngoscope will be used for intubation
Experimental: Pentax-AWS Group
Pentax-AWS videolaryngoscope will be used for nasotracheal intubation with MILS
MILS(Manual in-line stabilization) will be applied during intubation. With MILS, different kinds of laryngoscope will be evaluated in a simulated difficult airway.
Pentax AWS videolaryngoscope will be used for intubation
Experimental: Macintosh Laryngoscope Group
Macintosh Laryngoscope will be used for nasotracheal intubation with MILS
MILS(Manual in-line stabilization) will be applied during intubation. With MILS, different kinds of laryngoscope will be evaluated in a simulated difficult airway.
Macintosh laryngoscope will be used for intubation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time for intubation
Time Frame: from holding the laryngoscope until the 1st ventilation after intubation, within 90 seconds
from holding the laryngoscope until the 1st ventilation after intubation, within 90 seconds
Cormack Lehane Laryngeal view
Time Frame: when laryngoscope is appropriately placed during intubation, approximately 2 seconds
when laryngoscope is appropriately placed during intubation, approximately 2 seconds
POGP score
Time Frame: when laryngoscope is appropriately placed during intubation, approximately 2 seconds
Percentage of glottic opening(POGO)
when laryngoscope is appropriately placed during intubation, approximately 2 seconds

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
external laryngeal manipulation
Time Frame: when laryngoscope is appropriately placed during intubation, approximately 2 seconds
When the laryngeal view is insufficient during laryngoscope, another physician can manipulate the larynx externally to improve the laryngeal view. The necessity of external laryngeal manipulation will be recorded.
when laryngoscope is appropriately placed during intubation, approximately 2 seconds
magill forceps
Time Frame: when laryngoscope is appropriately placed during intubation, approximately 5 seconds
when the nasotracheal tube can not introduced to vocal cord manually, magill forceps can hold the tube to advance the tube through vocal cord. The necessity of magill forceps during intubation will be recorded
when laryngoscope is appropriately placed during intubation, approximately 5 seconds
IDS (intubation difficulty scale)
Time Frame: during intubation, approximately 90 seconds

IDS score is the sum of the following seven variables:

N1: the number of intubation attempts>1 N2: the number of operators. 1 N3: the number of alternative intubation techniques used N4: glottic exposure (Cormack Lehane grade minus 1) N5: Lifting force required during laryngoscopy (0=normal; 1=increased) N6: necessity for external laryngeal pressure (0=not applied; 1=applied) N7: position of the vocal cords at intubation (0=abduction/ not visualized; 1=adduction)

during intubation, approximately 90 seconds
numeric rating scale for intubation
Time Frame: during intubation, approximately 90 seconds
0-10 (0; no difficulty, 10: hardest)
during intubation, approximately 90 seconds
grade of bleeding
Time Frame: 10 seconds after completion of intubation

After confirmation of successful intubation, Yankauer suction was introduced to access the intraoral bleeding during intubation.

Grade is 4 points scale (none/trace/moderate/severe).

10 seconds after completion of intubation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Go Un Roh, MD, Ajou University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AJIRB-MED-DE1-15-334

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oral Surgery

Clinical Trials on MILS

Subscribe