Operative Treatment of Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures With Versus Without Wrist Arthroscopy (RADAR)

March 7, 2019 updated by: Niels Schep, Maasstad Hospital

Operative Treatment of Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures With Versus Without Wrist Arthroscopy, a Randomized Controlled Trial

Open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular distal radius fractures leads to better functional outcomes the first 6 months compared to non-operative treatment. However, some patients continue to have a painful and stiff wrist post-operatively. Arthroscopically assisted removal of intra- articular fracture haematoma and debris may reduce pain and improve the functional outcomes following operative treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures. Moreover, during arthroscopy the quality of the reduction and the presence of associated ligamentous injuries can be assessed. Therefore the objective of this study is to compare the functional outcome of internal plate fixation with additional wrist arthroscopy versus conventional fluoroscopic assisted internal plate fixation in adult patients with displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Distal radius fractures account for 17% of all fractures seen at the emergency department. Fifty percent of these fractures are intra-articular. The past several years an increase in open reposition internal fixation (ORIF) for distal radius fractures has been observed. This technique leads to a quicker resume of function the first 3 to 6 months compared to non-operative treatment. However, some patients continue to have a painful and stiff wrist postoperatively. Arthroscopically assisted removal of intra-articular fracture haematoma and debris may improve the functional outcomes following operative treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures. Moreover, during arthroscopy the quality of the reduction and the presence of associated ligamentous injuries can be assessed.

To our knowledge, no studies have been carried out to further examine the use of arthroscopy after internal plate fixation to remove fracture haematoma and debris on functional outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this randomised controlled trial is to determine the difference in functional outcome, assessed with the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, after internal plate fixation with an additional wrist arthroscopy and conventional fluoroscopically assisted internal plate fixation in adult patients with displaced complete articular distal radius fractures. Secondary, we aim to determine the difference in functional outcomes with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, post-operative pain, range of motion, grip strength, complications, quality of life (SF-36), and cost-effectiveness. Additionally, for patients undergoing additional wrist arthroscopy the quality of reduction, associated ligamentous injuries and cartilage damage will be assessed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nederland
      • Rotterdam, Nederland, Netherlands, 1072 VM
        • Maasstad Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥18 years
  • Displaced intra-articular distal radius fracture (AO/OTA type C) as classified on lateral, posterior anterior and lateral carporadial radiographs by a radiologist or trauma surgeon
  • Inacceptable closed reduction requiring open reduction and internal fixation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dorsal plate fixation in case the radiocarpal joint needs to be opened
  • Patients with impaired wrist function prior to injury due to arthrosis/neurological disorders of the upper limb
  • Open distal radius fractures
  • Multiple trauma patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16)
  • Other fractures of the affected extremity (except from ulnar styloid process)
  • Fracture of other wrist
  • Insufficient comprehension of the Dutch language to understand a rehabilitation program and other treatment information as judged by the attending physician
  • Patient suffering from disorders of bone metabolism other than osteoporosis (i.e. Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, osteomalacia)
  • Patients suffering from connective tissue disease or (joint) hyperflexibility disorders such as Marfan's, Ehler Danlos or other related disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ORIF
The operation has to be performed within 3 weeks after the initial trauma. According to the current standard, antibiotic prophylaxis (Cefazoline, 1000 milligram intravenous) will be administered thirty minutes preoperatively. The distal radius will be approached according to Henry, which beholds an incision between the tendon of the flexor carpi radialis and the arteria radialis. After the fracture site is exposed, the fracture will be reduced and an appropriate volar locking plate will be positioned. The type and brand of the plate are at discretion of the treating surgeon. When a dorsal approach is deemed necessary the distal radius will be approached between the third and fourth dorsal extensor tendon compartments. To evaluate the quality of articular reduction, fluoroscopic images will be obtained. Wound closure will be performed using standard techniques.
Other Names:
  • open reduction and internal fixation
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ORIF with additional wrist arthroscopy
Surgery will be performed by a certified trauma surgeon, with experience in wrist arthroscopy. A delay of minimal 5 days before performing arthroscopy is mandatory to enable visualisation due to the organisation of the hematoma. During wrist arthroscopy, the forearm will be positioned upright and in neutral position, the elbow flexed by 90° and axial traction of 4-6 kg will be performed. Four portal entrees are created by superficial stab incisions and blunt preparation through the joint capsule; one midcarpal radiair and one midcarpal ulnar portal and the 3-4 and 6-R portal. A shaver is used for removal of fracture haematoma and osteocartilaginous debris. Cartilage damage will be graded using the Outerbridge classification system. With the 1 mm hook probe assessment of the quality of reduction and ligamentous injuries (TFCC, scapholunate and lunotriquetral) will be performed. Wound closure will be performed using standard techniques.
Other Names:
  • open reduction and internal fixation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation
Time Frame: 3 months
The PRWE is a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disability in activities of daily living. The PRWE allows patients to rate their levels of wrist pain and disability from 0 to 10, and consists of three subscales: Pain, Function and Cosmetics.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand
Time Frame: 3 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score is a 30-item, self-report questionnaire designed to measure physical function and symptoms in patients with any or several musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb.
3 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months
Pain
Time Frame: 1 day post-operative and 1, 3 and 6 weeks and 3 months
Pain as indicated on a visual Analogue Scale (VAS), in which 0 implies no pain and 10 the worst possible pain. Patients will be asked to give an estimation of the type and quantity of pain medication taken during all follow-up visits.
1 day post-operative and 1, 3 and 6 weeks and 3 months
Range of motion
Time Frame: 3 and 6 weeks and 3 months
Range of motion of the wrist measured on both sides with a handheld goniometer.
3 and 6 weeks and 3 months
Grip strength
Time Frame: 3 and 6 weeks and 3 months
Grip strength as measured with a dynamometer.
3 and 6 weeks and 3 months
Complications
Time Frame: 1 day post-operative and 1, 3 and 6 weeks and 3 months
Complication rate such as: wound and/or plate infection, tendon irritation and/or rupture, neuropathy and the occurrence of complex regional pain syndrome.
1 day post-operative and 1, 3 and 6 weeks and 3 months
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 3 and 6 weeks and 3 months

Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility measured with an economic evaluation questionnaire based on the EQ-6D and the Standard Form Health and Labour questionnaire.

Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility measured with an economic evaluation questionnaire based on the EQ-6D and the Standard Form Health and Labour questionnaire.

3 and 6 weeks and 3 months
Associated injuries
Time Frame: Peroperative
In the intervention group the quality of reduction, associated ligamentous injuries and cartilage damage will be assessed. Ligamentous injuries are divided in TFCC injuries, classified according to the Palmer classification and scapholunate ligament and lunotruquetral injuries, graded according to the Geissler classification.
Peroperative
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation
Time Frame: 3 and 6 weeks, and 6 and 12 months
The PRWE is a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disability in activities of daily living. The PRWE allows patients to rate their levels of wrist pain and disability from 0 to 10, and consists of three subscales: Pain, Function and Cosmetics.
3 and 6 weeks, and 6 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 2, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 18, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 26, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distal Radius Fracture

Clinical Trials on ORIF

3
Subscribe