Neuropsychobiological Correlates of Sex-steroid Hormone Manipulation in Healthy Women: a Risk Model for Depression (GnRHa)

January 19, 2016 updated by: Gitte Moos Knudsen

The project aimed at identifying neuropsychobiological signatures of pharmacological sex-steroid hormone manipulations in healthy women as a risk model for depression.

The study is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Investigators included 63 healthy female volunteers with regular menstrual cycles between 23 and 35 days. Participants were randomized to active Gonadotrophin-Releasing-Hormone agonist (GnRHa) (goserelin 3.6 mg implant) or placebo (saline injection) intervention, which was initiated in the mid follicular phase (i.e. cycle day 22.6 ±2.5). Sixty women completed follow-up and entered the analyses, except for a few drop outs on some domains. The following domains were addressed at baseline and at follow-up (16±3 days post intervention), (which corresponded to the early ovarian suppression phase of the biphasic hormone response to GnRHa): 1) serotonin transporter binding as imaged by 11CDASB Positron Emission Tomography (PET), 2) functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) emotional processing, 3) fMRI reward processing, 3) rating state fMRI (rsfMRI), 4) structural MRI, 5) Neuropsychology, 6) Psychophysiology, 7) Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenal cortex (HPA)-axis dynamics, 8) Peripheral markers of immunoactive cell responses, 9) Epigenetic factors.

Psychometrics in terms of self reported mental distress and interview based ratings were monitored across the intervention period to monitor potential symptoms of mental distress and psychopathology. Also ovarian hormone responses, peripheral blood markers, and side effects scores were collected across the intervention period.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aims and hypotheses:

Gender matters in normal brain function as well as in neuropsychiatric disorders. E.g. the vulnerability to mood and anxiety disorders is considerably greater in women. Among other factors, this possibly reflects gender differences in central serotonergic function since dysfunction of serotonergic neurotransmission is critically involved in the pathophysiology of mood and anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease. In particular, women going through phases in life where sex hormones decline rapidly from high levels or fluctuate, have a higher frequency of severe mood state changes and are more vulnerable to psychiatric disorders, e.g. across the pre to postpartum and menopausal transition. Interestingly, this risk is associated with increased variability of the plasma levels of the sex-hormone estradiol. Therefore, sex-hormone manipulation with a pharmacologically induced biphasic ovarian hormone response serve as a unique opportunity to study how sex-hormone fluctuations provoke mood state changes and increase vulnerability to neuropsychiatric disorders.

In this project investigators aimed at investigating whether sex-hormone manipulation affects: 1. Molecular imaging markers of serotonergic neurotransmission in vivo, 2. Brain structure, architecture and functional connectivity, 3. Stress and inflammatory responses, and 4. Cognitive functions, emotional processing, and information filtering, of importance in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders.

Mentally healthy female volunteers were assessed at baseline (i.e cycle day 6.6 ±2.2) and at follow-up (i.e 16.2 ±2.6 days post intervention) in the early ovarian suppression phase af a Gonadotrophin-Releasing-Hormone agonist response in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded design (cohort size aim: N=30x2).

Research in neurobiological correlates of vulnerability related to sex-hormone changes is pivotal to improve the etiological understanding of brain disorders with gender differences in their incidence and/or nature. Such research may contribute to ameliorate fertility treatment, to improve treatment of mood disorders and schizophrenia, and, ideally, shed light on possible preventive strategies in vulnerable phases of women's lives such as the pre- to post-partum and menopausal transition period.

Hypotheses:

Investigators hypothesised that sex-hormone manipulation is associated with the following: 1. Compromised serotonergic neurotransmission, 2. Changes in functional and structural connectivity and lower hippocampal brain volumes and/or markers of decreased neurogenesis, 3. Increased stress reactivity and inflammatory responses, and 4. Changes in neurocognitive functioning and negative bias in emotional processing and information filtering. Investigators further hypothesised that these changes occur in a manner dependent on the magnitude of the estradiol drop from baseline and dependent on symptoms of depressed and anxious mood.

General study design:

The study is a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, combined within-subject and between-group design of neuropsychobiological changes in response to hormonal down-regulation. The investigation program will be performed at baseline in the mid-follicular phase, at day 5-8 of the menstrual cycle, and in the down-regulated state, 14-19 days after GnRHa intervention.

Participants. Investigators aimed at including 60 healthy female volunteers, in the age range 18-40 years. Group 1 (N=30) will receive sex-hormone manipulation with GnRHa, and group 2 (N=30) will receive placebo (saline injection). The inclusion will be stratified according to a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter promoter region (5-HTLPR).

The investigation program includes functional brain imaging of the serotonin transporter with [11C]DASB PET (6) and fMRI, structural brain imaging, blood measurements of sex-hormone levels, inflammatory and epigenetic biomarkers, characterization of the cortisol awakening response, and psychophysiological measures of information processing, and monitoring of symptoms of mental distress and psychopathology across the intervention period. An initial screening program will secure inclusion of healthy controls only and determine trait parameters such as genotypes, IQ and personality measures.

The study was registered at and approved by the Danish Ethical Committee before participant inclusion under the protocol identification number: H-2-2010-108. All participants gave written informed consent.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy women
  • Regular menstrual cycles (23 -35 days cycle length)
  • No systemic or intrauterine steroid hormone use

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychiatric disorder (DSM IV Axis I or WHO ICD-10 diagnostic classification).
  • Prior or present neurological or other severe medical condition including substance abuse.
  • No drug intake suspected to influence results
  • Conditions that may increase risk by participating in the study program including ovarian cysts
  • Pregnancy during the last year
  • Delivery during the last 2 years
  • Presently wishing to obtain pregnancy
  • Breast feeding
  • Not fluent in Danish or severe visual or hearing impairments
  • Earlier or present learning disabilities
  • Claustrophobia (due to MRI scans)
  • Metal implants (excludes MRI)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Injection of saline
Injection of saline
Other Names:
  • Saline
Active Comparator: GnRHa
Goserelin 3.6 mg implant
Pharmacologically induced biphasic sex-steroid hormone fluctuation
Other Names:
  • Zoladex

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes from baseline in symptoms of depression
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Hamilton 17 item score
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes from baseline in serotonin transporter binding in volumes of interest (VOIs)
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
PET scan assessed serotonin transporter binding changes
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes from baseline in fMRI response to emotional faces
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
fMRI response changes to emotional faces in emotion processing network including amygdala reactivity
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes from baseline in fMRI response to gambling paradigm
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
fMRI response changes to reward (monetary win) paradigm in reward processing network
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes from baseline in rsfMRI changes in functional connectivity
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
rsfMRI changes in functional connectivity in response to intervention
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes from baseline in affective cognition (VAMT-24 test)
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Neuropsychological (VAMT-24 test) outcomes on affective cognition
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes from baseline in reaction time
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes in reaction time
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Serial mood fluctuations (SD of total mood disturbance (TMD) score of daily POMS across intervention period)
Time Frame: Intervention start to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Mood fluctuations measured by serial collection of daily POMS
Intervention start to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes from baseline in hippocampal volume
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Hippocampal volumes from structural MRI
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes in pre-pulse-inhibition (PPI) from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Change in amplitude of the startle response to pulse after pre-pulse warning as measured by EMG in the orbicularis oculi muscle (subtraction of averages across a series of 10 repititions at baseline and at follow-up 16±3 days).
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes in a set of markers of immunoactivity across study period
Time Frame: Baseline, intervention time, flare-up phase and follow-up
Cytokines, hsCRP and gene transcript profile markers of
Baseline, intervention time, flare-up phase and follow-up
Changes in epigenetic markers of estrogen sensitivity
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Epigenetic (methylation) markers
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes in HPA-axis dynamics (the cortisol awakening response)
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
The cortical awakening response
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes in sensorimotor gating (P50 suppression) from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes in sensorimotor gating (P50 suppression) from baseline
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes from baseline in hippocampal microstructure
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Hippocampal microstructure from MRI
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes from baseline in fMRI responses to emotional memory paradigm
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes in brain activation to fMRI emotional memory paradigm - delayed recall forgetting of word prior to emotional disturbance
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes from baseline in Cohens perceived stress score
Time Frame: Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes Cohens perceived stress score
Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after intervention
Changes in Pittsburg Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 time per week until follow-up at 16 ±3 days
Sleep quality self reported weekly across intervention period
Baseline and 1 time per week until follow-up at 16 ±3 days
Side effects scores (project specific 15 items questionnaire)
Time Frame: 7, 12 and 30 days post intervention
Total side effect score across and after intervention period
7, 12 and 30 days post intervention
Changes in SCL-R (Symptom check-list revised)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 time per week from intervention to follow up at 16±3 days post intervention
Changes in symptoms of psychopathology across intervention period
Baseline and 1 time per week from intervention to follow up at 16±3 days post intervention
Major Depression Inventory (MDI)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 time per week from intervention to follow up at 16±3 days post intervention
Changes in self-reported symptoms of depression across intervention period
Baseline and 1 time per week from intervention to follow up at 16±3 days post intervention
Changes in profile of mood states (POMS TMD score)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 time per week from intervention to follow up at 16±3 days post intervention
Changes in self-reported symptoms of mental distress across intervention period
Baseline and 1 time per week from intervention to follow up at 16±3 days post intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ovarian hormone responses to intervention
Time Frame: Baseline (i.e, cycle day 5-8), intervention time (i.e cycle day 21-23), flare-up phase (i.e, 3-4 days post intervention) and follow-up (i.e.,16±3 days post intervention)
Ovarian hormone responses to intervention, i.e. concentrations of estradiol, progesterone and testosterone in peripheral blood)
Baseline (i.e, cycle day 5-8), intervention time (i.e cycle day 21-23), flare-up phase (i.e, 3-4 days post intervention) and follow-up (i.e.,16±3 days post intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 22, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 22, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Via database of Center for Integrated Molecular Brain Imaging (Knudsen et al 2016, NeuroImage) data will be available for neuroscience research community contingent on approval by scientific board

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Goserelin 3.6 mg implant

3
Subscribe