Play Interventions to Reduce Anxiety and Negative Emotions in Hospitalized Children

January 22, 2016 updated by: The University of Hong Kong
Hospitalization is a stressful and threatening experience, which can be emotionally devastating to children. Hospital play interventions have been widely used to prepare children for invasive medical procedures and hospitalization. Nevertheless, there is an imperative need for rigorous empirical scrutiny of the effectiveness of hospital play interventions, in particular, using play activities to ease the psychological burden of hospitalized children. This study tested the effectiveness of play interventions to reduce anxiety and negative emotions in hospitalized children. A non-equivalent control group pre-test and post-test, between subjects design was conducted in the two largest acute-care public hospitals in Hong Kong. A total of 304 Chinese children (ages 3-12) admitted for treatments in these two hospitals were invited to participate in the study. Of the 304 paediatric patients, 154 received hospital play interventions and 150 received usual care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study tested the effectiveness of play interventions to reduce anxiety and negative emotions in hospitalized children.

Intervention

Placebo control group

In the control group, children received standard medical and nursing care, such as vital signs observation, pharmacological treatment and wound and pain management.

Experimental group

In the experimental group, participants received around 30 minutes of hospital play interventions each day, conducted by hospital play specialists. The interventions in this study consisted of structured and non-structured activities. All these activities were given at the patients' bedside, with or without parental supervision, either once or spreading over an hour, depending on the ward routine.

Data Collection Methods

Approval for the study was obtained from the hospital ethics committees. A research assistant collected demographic data from the parents and from the children's medical records after obtaining the consent form. The children's baseline anxiety levels were also documented. For the experimental group, the interventions started after the baseline data had been collected. The emotional behaviour of each child was observed by a research assistant for two consecutive days, at the end of which a research assistant documented the child's overall emotional behaviour, using the CEMS. The child's anxiety levels were reassessed and documented.

Analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software, version 20.0 for Windows was used for the data analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the means, standard deviations, and ranges of the scores on the various scales. The homogeneity of the two groups was examined using inferential statistics (independent t-test and chi-squared). The interrelationships among the scores on the different scales and the demographic variables were assessed using the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. Differences in the mean scores on the CEMS and the children's anxiety levels between the two intervention groups were investigated by an independent t-test and mixed between-within subjects ANOVA, respectively. Multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the effects of participants' demographic and clinical characteristics on the outcome measures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

304

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • were Chinese children aged between 3 and 12,
  • able to speak Cantonese
  • required to stay in hospital for at least three consecutive days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • children with identified cognitive and learning difficulties

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: play intervention
30 minutes of hospital play interventions
participants received around 30 minutes of hospital play interventions each day, conducted by hospital play specialists. Such interventions consisted of structured and non-structured activities. All these activities were given at the patients' bedside, with or without parental supervision, either once or spreading over an hour, depending on the ward routine.
Placebo Comparator: control
usual care
Children received standard medical and nursing care, such as vital signs observation, pharmacological treatment and wound and pain management as a control treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety levels change from baseline at 2 days after admission between intervention and control group for children aged 3 - 7
Time Frame: two days after admission
Anxiety levels of children aged between 3 and 7 were assessed by using the Visual Analogue Scale , which consists of a 10 cm horizontal line on a piece of card, with different facial expressions supplemented by the words 'I have no anxiety' at one end and 'I have so much anxiety' at the other. They were asked to respond to this scale at 2 days after admission.
two days after admission

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety levels change from baseline at 2 days after admission between intervention and control group for children aged 8 - 12
Time Frame: two days after admission
Anxiety levels of children aged between 8 and 12 were assessed by using the short-form Chinese version of the State Anxiety Scale for Children (CSAS-C). This consists of 10 items scored from 1 to 3, with total scores ranging from 10 to 30. Higher scores represent greater anxiety. They were asked to respond to this scale at 2 days after admission.
two days after admission
baseline anxiety levels for children aged 3 - 7
Time Frame: baseline
Anxiety levels of children aged between 3 and 7 were assessed by using the Visual Analogue Scale , which consists of a 10 cm horizontal line on a piece of card, with different facial expressions supplemented by the words 'I have no anxiety' at one end and 'I have so much anxiety' at the other. They were asked to respond to this scale at baseline .
baseline
baseline anxiety levels for children aged 8 -12
Time Frame: baseline
Anxiety levels of children aged between 8 and 12 were assessed by using the short-form Chinese version of the State Anxiety Scale for Children (CSAS-C). This consists of 10 items scored from 1 to 3, with total scores ranging from 10 to 30. Higher scores represent greater anxiety. They were asked to respond to this scale at baseline.
baseline
overall emotion behaviors for the 2-day period of hospitalization (CEMS)
Time Frame: the 2-day period of hospitalization
The emotions of the hospitalized children were assessed using the Children's Emotional Manifestation Scale (CEMS), which is an observation scale. The CEMS consists of five categories, each category scored from 1 to 5, with summed scores from 5 to 25. Higher scores represent more negative emotional behavior. The emotional behaviour of each child was observed by a research assistant for two consecutive days, at the end of which a research assistant documented the child's overall emotional behaviour, using the CEMS.
the 2-day period of hospitalization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ho Cheung, William LI, PhD, The University of Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 27, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 27, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KW/FR-12-020

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plan for making the data available to the public

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Play intervention

Subscribe