Treatments for Fathers With ADHD and Their At-Risk Children (Fathers Too)

September 10, 2018 updated by: Mark Stein, Seattle Children's Hospital

Treatments for Fathers With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Their At-Risk Children (Fathers Too)

In contrast to mothers with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), the impact of paternal ADHD in families and children with ADHD symptoms has not been studied, despite the prevalence of ADHD in males. Thus, the investigators do not know the feasibility, impact on treatment on the family and child, and effects of treating fathers relative to mothers with ADHD. Paternal ADHD is associated with negative parenting and child conduct problems.

The investigators hypothesize that successfully treating parental ADHD in fathers will have a beneficial effects on the family that will extend to the child. Specifically, the investigators believe that stimulant medication ((Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) or a different ADHD medication if poor response to LDX) with fathers will reduce father's ADHD symptoms and improve parenting. Effects of stimulant treatment of fathers will be compared to Behavioral Parent Training (BPT) on parenting, and paternal and child outcomes in fathers with ADHD who have children between the ages of 3 -8.

As in the investigator's previous work, the investigators will bank paternal and child DNA and RNA for later examination of pharmacogenetic and epigenetic effects (i.e. RNA) of stimulant response.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The overarching goal of this research program is to construct and evaluate paternal and familial interventions to improve the trajectory of ADHD outcomes in at-risk young children with ADHD symptoms who have not yet been treated with stimulant medications. These children are at risk for ADHD by virtue of paternal ADHD and maladaptive parenting. Our primary outcome measure for the child will be whether child ADHD symptoms on the Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales decreased at the completion of the study. The primary outcomes for the fathers will be the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Self Report and Other Report (CAARS), the clinician completed Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) and the Barkley Functional Impairment rating Scale (BFIS). Secondary outcomes include the Family Routines Questionnaire (FRI), the Alabama Parent Questionnaire (APQ) and the Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS).

Specific Aim 1: To develop screening and recruitment strategies for identifying fathers with ADHD who have young children at risk for ADHD.

Specific Aim 2: To assess the comparative efficacy of treating fathers with LDX (or a different ADHD medication if poor response to LDX) and functional impairment after 8 weeks of treatment.

Hypothesis 1a: LDX will be associated with a greater reduction in paternal ADHD symptoms (CAARS, CAARS-Other Informant) and impairment (CGI-S) than families treated with BPT.

Hypothesis 1 b: BPT will be associated with greater improvement on measures of parenting (e.g. APQ, DPICS) and family functioning (DAS, BFIS) than LDX.

To the investigator's knowledge, this 2.5 year study will be the very first to examine the benefit of identifying and treating fathers with ADHD prior to treating the at-risk child. In addition, to the investigator's knowledge, this is the first study to directly compare the impact of BPT vs. LDX on both father and child outcomes. Thus, the investigator's propose a novel treatment strategy for a not uncommon but difficult to treat patient population: young children who are at risk for ADHD by virtue of their early-onset behavior problems and environmental factors such a poor parenting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
        • Seattle Children's

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 51 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Fathers Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sign informed consent
  • Be between 21-55 years old (inclusive) at the screening visit
  • English-speaking
  • At screening (after washout, if required) meet full DSM-IV criteria for ADHD, any subtype
  • Current CGI-S-ADHD rating ≥ 4 and < 7.
  • Findings on physical exam (PE), laboratory studies, vital signs, and electrocardiogram (ECG) judged to be normal for age with no contraindications for MPH treatment.
  • Pulse and blood pressure (BP) within 95% of age and gender mean
  • Commit to the entire visit schedule for the study.
  • Able to complete all study assessments.
  • Fathers with comorbid mood/anxiety disorders which are effectively treated with antidepressants or anti-anxiety agents will be eligible for participation, provided this medication has not changed within 30 days, is well tolerated, and that current mood symptoms are not severe or associated with active suicidal ideation.

Father Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of allergic reactions or severe negative response to study medications
  • Active alcohol/substance abuse in the past 3 months or a positive urinary toxic screen on initial evaluation that is not explained by a time-limited medical circumstance.
  • Current bipolar illness, schizophrenia, psychoses, or significant suicidal risk
  • History of chronic or acute medical disorder for which stimulant therapy would be contraindicated (e.g., glaucoma, hypertension).
  • Currently, (or within the past 30 days) receiving stimulant medication for ADHD.
  • Father should not seek parent-based interventions during the course of the study, Weeks 1 - 8.

Child Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sign assent if older than six.
  • Be between the ages of 3-8.
  • Symptoms of ADHD (Conners Hyperactivity Index or Attention > 60).
  • English speaking.
  • No prior treatment with effective doses of stimulants.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Medication Arm
Vyvanse Arm: 3-week open-label titration beginning at 20 mg Vyvanse (a class II drug), and be increased weekly during the titration period until an optimal response is obtained and then continue for 5 weeks. Optimal response is defined as a clinician Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score (CGI-I) ≤ 2 with minimal associated adverse events. Fathers will remain on optimal dose through the course of the study. In cases of poor tolerability or loss of efficacy the dose can be changed. If an optimal response is not achieved a trial with a long acting methylphenidate will be initiated based upon the Texas algorithm for stimulant medication. The study physician will be available by phone 24 hours/day; participants will be instructed to call with any safety concerns.
Half of the participants (fathers) will be randomized to receive Vyvanse.
Other Names:
  • lisdexamfetamine dimesylate
If Vyvanse is not well tolerated, methylphenidate can be prescribed.
Other Names:
  • MPH
Active Comparator: Behavioral Parent Training Arm
Behavioral Parent Training (BPT) Arm: Fathers in the BPT group will receive weekly parent training sessions based on the Barkley manual, "Defiant Children, Third Edition". The child participants will also come to several sessions at the clinician's and supervisor's discretion.
Half of the fathers will receive behavioral parent training.
Other Names:
  • BPT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CGI -S - ADHD rating scale (Father)
Time Frame: Change from Screening at 8 weeks.
Clinical Global Impression - Severity .
Change from Screening at 8 weeks.
Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Self Report (Father)
Time Frame: Change from Screening at 8 weeks.
This is a 93-item, reliable and valid measure assessing the core features of DSM-IV ADHD, while adding content unique to the adult expression of ADHD
Change from Screening at 8 weeks.
Conners Other Report (about Father)
Time Frame: Change from Screening at 8 weeks
Completed by collateral informant. The Conners Other Report is a reliable and valid measure assessing the core features of DSM-IV ADHD, while adding content unique to the adult expression of ADHD
Change from Screening at 8 weeks
Barkley Functional Impairment Rating Scale (Father)
Time Frame: Change from Screening at 8 weeks.
The BFIS is a promising measure of impairment associated with adult ADHD, with adequate reliability, criterion validity with other measures of impairment, and normative data for adults. Normative data and reliable change index will allow for assessing functioning in domains relevant to the current proposal (i.e. Home-family, Daily Responsibilities, Child Rearing) as Well as Mean Impairment Score are sensitive to treatment effects.
Change from Screening at 8 weeks.
Conners Parent (completed by parent about child)
Time Frame: Change form Screening at 8 weeks.
Conners Parent Rating Scale that results in factor scores for Oppositional Behavior, Cognitive Problems, and Hyperactivity. There is extensive normative data and evidence of reliability, validity, and clinical utility (Hart, 1999). This will be the primary measure specifically for ADHD and externalizing symptoms.
Change form Screening at 8 weeks.
Conners Teacher Rating Scale (completed by teacher about child)
Time Frame: Change from Screening at 8 weeks.
Conners Teacher Rating Scale that results in factor scores for Oppositional Behavior, Cognitive Problems, and Hyperactivity. There is extensive normative data and evidence of reliability, validity, and clinical utility (Hart, 1999). This will be the primary measure specifically for ADHD and externalizing symptoms.
Change from Screening at 8 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Barkley Functional Impairment Rating Scale (BFIS) - Other
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 8 Weeks.
Completed by collateral informant. The BFIS is a promising measure of impairment associated with adult ADHD, with adequate reliability, criterion validity with other measures of impairment, and normative data for adults. Normative data and reliable change index will allow for assessing functioning in domains relevant to the current proposal (i.e. Home-family, Daily Responsibilities, Child Rearing) as Well as Mean Impairment Score are sensitive to treatment effects.
Change from Baseline at 8 Weeks.
Family Routines Inventory (FRI)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 8 Weeks.
The FRI is a 26-item parent-report measure that assesses the frequency with which families engage in a broad range of routines.
Change from Baseline at 8 Weeks.
Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 8 Weeks.
is a 42-item measure on which parents are asked to indicate the frequency with which they implement the following parenting practices: Corporal Punishment, Inconsistent Discipline, Poor Monitoring/Supervision, Involvement, and Positive Parenting.
Change from Baseline at 8 Weeks.
Dyadic Parent-Child Interactions (DPICS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 8 Weeks.
Parents and children will engage in 3 tasks.
Change from Baseline at 8 Weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark A Stein, PhD, Seattle Children's

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Clinical Trials on Vyvanse

Subscribe