Comparison of Oral Octreotide Capsules to Injectable Somatostatin Analogs in Acromegaly (MPOWERED)

March 24, 2022 updated by: Chiasma, Inc.

A Phase 3, Randomized, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate Maintenance of Response, Safety and Patient Reported Outcomes in Acromegaly Patients Treated With Octreotide Capsules vs. Parenteral Somatostatin Receptor Ligands

Octreotide capsule is a novel, orally-administered formulation of the commercially-available injectable drug octreotide. In a recent phase 3 trial (OPTMAL; NCT03252353), oral octreotide capsules demonstrated sustained biochemical response up to 13 months in patients with acromegaly previously managed with somatostatin analog injections (ref).

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and patient reported outcomes (PROs) between oral octreotide capsules and injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This was phase 3, randomized, open-label, active controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the maintenance of response, safety and patient reported outcomes (PROs) in acromegaly patients treated with octreotide capsules and in patients treated with standard of care parenteral somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), who previously tolerated and demonstrated biochemical control on both treatments.

The core study consisted of three phases: a Screening phase, Run-in phase and a Randomized Controlled Treatment (RCT) phase.

Eligible patients who were biochemically controlled on parenteral SRLs were switched to octreotide capsules for a 26-week period Run-in phase. During this phase the effective dose for each patient was determined through dose titration.

Patients whose acromegaly has been controlled biochemically on octreotide capsules at the end of the Run-in phase entered a 36-week open-label RCT phase, where they randomized to continue on octreotide capsules or switch back to their injectable SRL treatment (as received prior to Screening).

Following the completion of the core study (Screening, Run-in and RCT phases), eligible patients were offered to enter the Study Extension phase and receive octreotide capsules until product marketing or study termination.

A Sub-study, performed in selected non-European sites, allowed patients with inadequate biochemical control on octreotide capsules during the Run-in phase to enter a Combination phase and receive co-administration of octreotide capsules with cabergoline tablets for a total of 36 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

146

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Graz, Austria, A-8036
        • Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin Klinische Abteilung für Endokrinologie und Diabetologie
      • Wien, Austria, A-1090
        • Medizinische Universität Wien
      • Bron, France, 69677
        • Hospices Civils de Lyon
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 94275
        • Hôpital Bicêtre APHP
      • Oldenburg, Germany, 26122
        • Praxis für Endokrinologie und Diabetologie Dr M Droste
      • Budapest, Hungary, H-1062
        • Magyar Honvedseg Egeszsegugyi Kozpont
      • Pecs, Hungary, H-7624
        • University of Pecs
      • Szeged, Hungary, H-6720
        • Szegedi Tudományegyetem, I. Belgyógyászati Klinika
      • Monserrato, Italy, 09042
        • Policlinico di Monserrato U.O.C. Endocrinologia e Diabetologia
      • Pisa, Italy, 56124
        • Università di Pisa Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale
      • Rome, Italy, 00168
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Università Cattolica del S.Cuore S.C. Endocrinologia e Malattie del Metabolismo
      • Kaunas, Lithuania, LT-50009
        • Hospital of LUHS Kauno Klinikos
      • Vilnius, Lithuania, LT-10207
        • Vaidotas Urbanavicius Individuali Imonė
      • Gdańsk, Poland, 80-211
        • Katedra i Klinika Endokrynologii i Chorob Wewnetrznych Gdanski Uniwersytet Medyczny
      • Wroclaw, Poland, 50-367
        • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 we Wroclawiu, Klinika Endokrynologii, Diabetologii i Leczenia Izotopami
      • Bucharest, Romania, 011863
        • "C.I. Parhon" National Institute of Endocrinology I Clinical Endocrinology Department - Endemic goitier and its complications
      • Barnaul, Russian Federation, 656043
        • Antrium Multidisciplinary Medical Clinic
      • Kazan, Russian Federation, 420101
        • Interregional Clinical Diagnostic Center
      • Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660022
        • Regional State Budgetary Healthcare Institution Regional State Hospital
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 119881
        • Sechenov Moscow First State Medical University
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 121170
        • "Atlas" Medical Center
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 129110
        • Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630087
        • Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194156
        • Federal State Budgetary Institution "V. A. Almazov Federal North-West Medical Research Centre" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
      • Samara, Russian Federation, 443041
        • "Centre Diabetes" LLC
      • Belgrade, Serbia, 11 000
        • Clinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases
      • Alzira, Spain, 46600
        • Hospital Universitario de La Ribera
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08916
        • Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
      • Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 15706
        • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela
      • Sevilla, Spain, 46013
        • Campus Del Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B15 2GW
        • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WL
        • Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary
      • Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE1 4LP
        • Royal Victoria Infirmary
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom, S10 2JF
        • Royal Hallamshire Hospital
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University School of Medicine
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Denver
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins University
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903
        • Rutgers - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43203
        • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15212
        • Allegheny Endocrinology Associates
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Houston Methodist Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of acromegaly
  • Treatment with Somatostatin analogs injections (octreotide or lanreotide) for at least 6 months
  • Biochemical control (IGF -1 < 1.3 x ULN and GH < 2.5ng/mL)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Injections of long-acting somatostatin analogs, at a dosing interval > 8 weeks.
  • Pituitary radiotherapy within 5 years
  • Pituitary surgery within six months
  • Patients who previously participated in CH-ACM-01 study
  • Any clinically significant uncontrolled concomitant disease
  • Symptomatic cholelithiasis
  • Previous treatment with:
  • Pegvisomant, within 12 weeks
  • Dopamine agonists, within 6 weeks
  • Pasireotide, within 12 weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Run-in phase
Oral octreotide capsules
Other Names:
  • Injection SRLs
Experimental: RCT phase - Oral
Oral octreotide capsules
Other Names:
  • Injection SRLs
Active Comparator: RCT phase - Injectables
Injectable somatostatin analogs (octreotide or lanreotide)
Other Names:
  • Injection SRLs
Experimental: Combination phase (sub-study)
Octreotide capsules plus cabergoline
Other Names:
  • Injection SRLs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Patients Who Are Biochemically Controlled Throughout the RCT Phase
Time Frame: 62 weeks
Proportion of patients who are biochemically controlled throughout the RCT phase. A patient was considered biochemically controlled if IGF-1 Time Weighted Average (TWA) during the RCT phase is <1.3 ULN
62 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Patients With Clinical and Biochemical Control at the End of the RCT Phase
Time Frame: Week 62/ End of treatment; EOT

Proportion of patients with clinical and biochemical control at the end of the RCT phase. Patients were considered biochemically and clinically controlled if they met both of the following criteria:

  • Their IGF-1 TWA during the RCT phase was <1.3 times ULN
  • Their AIS score at week 62/EOT was maintained or reduced compared to week 26 (start of RCT phase)
Week 62/ End of treatment; EOT
Proportion of Patients Who Maintain or Reduce the Overall Number of Active Acromegaly Symptoms at the End of the RCT Phase
Time Frame: 62 weeks
Proportion of patients who maintain or reduce the overall number of active acromegaly symptoms at the end of the RCT phase (week 62/ EOT) , compared to week 26 (start of the RCT phase
62 weeks
Proportion of Patients Who Maintain or Improve Their Overall Acromegaly Index of Severity (AIS) Score at the End of the RCT Phase
Time Frame: 62 weeks
Proportion of patients who maintain or improve their overall Acromegaly index of severity (AIS) score at the end of the RCT phase (improvement defined as a reduction of at least one point in the AIS score), compared to week 26 (start of the RCT phase)
62 weeks
Proportion of Patients of Those Completing the RCT Phase Who Entered the Study Extension Phase
Time Frame: 62 weeks
Proportion of patients of those completing the RCT phase (at a time octreotide capsules were not commercially available at the specific country), who entered the Study Extension phase, overall and by treatment group
62 weeks
Change in IGF-1 Levels in the RCT Phase
Time Frame: Change from Week 26 to week 62

Change in IGF-1 levels from the start of the randomized phase to the end of RCT phase.

Complete Responder (CR) is defined as IGF-1 ≤ 1 x ULN; Partial Responder (PR) is defined as 1 x ULN < IGF-1 < 1.3 x ULN, and Non-Responder (NR): IGF-1 ≥ 1.3 x ULN

Change from Week 26 to week 62
Change in GH Levels in the RCT Phase
Time Frame: Change from Week 26 to week 62
Change in GH levels from the start of the randomized phase through the end of RCT phase.
Change from Week 26 to week 62

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Patients Reporting Injection Site Reactions in the Acro-TSQ During the RCT Phase
Time Frame: 62 weeks
Proportion of patients reporting injection site reactions (ISRs). Acromegaly treatment satisfaction questionnaire (ACRO-TSQ) is a validated PRO tool assessing overall convenience and satisfaction with treatment and patient perception of symptomatic control and adverse drug. It includes 6 scales: Symptom Interference, (4 items); Treatment Convenience, (6 items); Injection Site Interference (2 items); GI Interference (3 items); Treatment Satisfaction, (3 items); and Emotional Reaction (3 items). Each scale score can range from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the lowest (highest burden/lower satisfaction) and 100 representing the best possible score (lowest burden/highest satisfaction) for each of the 6 scales. Positive ACRO-TSQ change scores indicate improvement while negative change scores indicate worsening.
62 weeks
Proportion of Patients Reporting Interference With Daily Activities in Acro-TSQ During the RCT Phase
Time Frame: 62 weeks

Proportion of patients reporting interference with daily activities in the Acromegaly Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (Acro-TSQ) during the RCT phase.

Acro-TSQ is a validated PRO tool assessing overall convenience and satisfaction with treatment and patient perception of symptomatic control and adverse drug. It includes 6 scales: Symptom Interference, (4 items); Treatment Convenience, (6 items); Injection Site Interference (2 items); GI Interference (3 items); Treatment Satisfaction, (3 items); and Emotional Reaction (3 items). Each scale score can range from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the lowest (highest burden/lower satisfaction) and 100 representing the best possible score (lowest burden/highest satisfaction) for each of the 6 scales. Positive Acro-TSQ change scores indicate improvement while negative change scores indicate worsening.

62 weeks
Proportion of Patients on Octreotide Capsules Who Are Biochemically Controlled at the End of the RCT Phase- Landmark Analysis
Time Frame: Average of weeks 58 and 62
Proportion of patients on octreotide capsules who are biochemically controlled at the end of the RCT phase defined as IGF-1< 1.3 x ULN based on average of weeks 58 and 62
Average of weeks 58 and 62
Proportion of Week 26 Responders on Octreotide Capsules Who Are Biochemically Controlled at the End of the RCT Phase- Landmark Sensitivity Analysis
Time Frame: 62 weeks
Proportion of patients on Octreotide Capsules Who Are Biochemically Controlled at the End of the RCT Phase- Landmark sensitivity analysis- Week 26 responders
62 weeks
Proportion of Patients Biochemically Controlled at the End of Run-in
Time Frame: 26 weeks
Proportion of patients biochemically controlled at the end of the Run-in phase, defined as average IGF-1 levels during weeks 24 and 26 < 1.3xULN
26 weeks
Proportion of Patients With a Reduction in the Overall Number of Active Acromegaly Symptoms at the End of the Run-in Phase
Time Frame: 26 weeks
Proportion of patients with a reduction in the overall number of active acromegaly symptoms at the end of the Run-in phase compared to Baseline
26 weeks
Proportion of Patients With Improved Acromegaly Index of Severity (AIS) Score at the End of the Run-in Phase
Time Frame: 26 weeks

Proportion of patients with improved AIS score at the end of the Run-in phase compared to Baseline Acromegaly index of severity (AIS) at the end of Run-in phase compared to Baseline.

The Acromegaly Index of Severity (AIS) symptom score is calculated based on the presence and severity of 5 acromegaly signs/symptoms: headache, swelling of extremities, joint pain, sweating, and fatigue. Each symptom was graded from no symptoms (score 0), to mild symptoms (1), moderate (2), or severe symptoms (3).

26 weeks
EuroQol - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Scores During the Run-in Phase
Time Frame: 26 weeks

Change from baselines in EQ-5D-5L Index scores in randomized participants during the Run-in phase.

EQ-5D-5L (five severity levels EQ-5D) is a standardized instrument completed by the patient for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions. It comprises 5 dimensions of health: mobility, ability to self care, ability to undertake usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Based on qualitative and quantitative studies conducted by the EuroQol Group, there are 5 levels under each domain: 'no problems' (assigned a value of 1), 'slight problems' (assigned a value of 2), 'moderate problems' (assigned a value of 3), 'severe problems' (assigned a value of 4), and 'unable to/extreme problems' (assigned a value of 5). An EQ-5D Index score is calculated based on the responses to these 5 dimensions of health. Weights for use in the index calculation are not universally available. Higher values represent better health states.

26 weeks
Change From Baseline to End of RCT Phase in WPAI
Time Frame: 26 weeks

Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire- RCT phase. WPAI:SHP is a standardized and validated PRO questionnaire to measure health outcomes in clinical trial settings. It measures time missed from work, impairment of work and regular activities due to overall health and symptoms, relative to measures of general health perceptions, role (physical), role (emotional), pain, symptom severity, and global measures of work and interference with regular activity.

The WPAI yields 4 types of scores: (1) absenteeism (work time missed); (2) presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); (3) work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and (4) activity impairment. Each of the 4 WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity (i.e., worse outcomes).

26 weeks
Change From Baseline to End of Run-in Phase in WPAI
Time Frame: 62 weeks

Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire- Run-in phase. WPAI:SHP is a standardized and validated PRO questionnaire to measure health outcomes in clinical trial settings. It measures time missed from work, impairment of work and regular activities due to overall health and symptoms, relative to measures of general health perceptions, role (physical), role (emotional), pain, symptom severity, and global measures of work and interference with regular activity.

The WPAI yields 4 types of scores: (1) absenteeism (work time missed); (2) presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); (3) work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and (4) activity impairment. Each of the 4 WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity (i.e., worse outcomes).

62 weeks
Change in Acromegaly Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ACRO-TSQ) Scores From Baseline to End of Run-in in Randomized Patients.
Time Frame: 26 weeks

Change in Acromegaly treatment satisfaction questionnaire (ACRO-TSQ) PRO questionnaire from baseline to end of Run-in phase in randomized patients.

Acro-TSQ is a validated PRO tool assessing overall convenience and satisfaction with treatment and patient perception of symptomatic control and adverse drug. It includes 6 scales: Symptom Interference, (4 items); Treatment Convenience, (6 items); Injection Site Interference (2 items); GI Interference (3 items); Treatment Satisfaction, (3 items); and Emotional Reaction (3 items). Each scale score can range from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the lowest (highest burden/lower satisfaction) and 100 representing the best possible score (lowest burden/highest satisfaction) for each of the 6 scales. Positive Acro-TSQ change scores indicate improvement while negative change scores indicate worsening.

26 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Maria Fleseriu, M.D., FACE, Northwest Pituitary Center, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR, USA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acromegaly

Clinical Trials on Octreotide capsules

3
Subscribe