Nonradiation-to-endoscopist Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients With Complexity Level I/II

July 20, 2016 updated by: Yanglin Pan, Air Force Military Medical University, China

The Effectiveness and Safety of Nonradiation-to-endoscopist Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients With Complexity Level I/II

Radiation exposure may put endoscopists at risk when performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Although non-radiation endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was reported in pregnant women in previous reports, it remains unclear whether endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is also effective and safe when endoscopists were not expose to radiation. This study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nonradiation-to-endoscopist endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with complexity level I/II.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

219

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Fujian
      • Xiamen, Fujian, China, 361001
        • Department of gastroenterology, Chinese PLA 174 Hospital
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710032
        • Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

18-90 years old, patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-90 years old
  • patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1 Bismuth typy Ⅲ and Ⅳ
  • 2 common bile duct stone > 15mm
  • 3 common bile duct stone and distal stenosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
intervention
patients undergoing nonradiation-to-endoscopist endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
All patients received magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography before the procedure. Characteristics of lesions (e.g. common bile duct stones, stenosis) in detail was identified. During the procedure, the endoscopist was not exposed to radiation. If fluoroscopy was needed, after contrast injection (sometimes not necessary), the endoscopist went outside of the operation room and observed the X-ray image by remote control of the fluoroscopy machine.
control
patients undergoing standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Patients received standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Fluoroscopy was normally used when necessary.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Time Frame: 6 months
The success is defined by complete removal of common bile duct stones or placement of stents in proper position.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall complications
Time Frame: 6 months
Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, infection of biliary tract
6 months
Cannulation success rate
Time Frame: 6 months
In patients with native papilla, cannulation success rate was defined as the proportion of subjects with successful cannulation of targeted duct
6 months
ERCP procedure time
Time Frame: 6 months
defined by the interval time between scope insertion and complete of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yanglin Pan, M.D., Air Force Military Medical University, China
  • Principal Investigator: Wei Zeng, M.D., Department of gastroenterology, Chinese PLA 174 Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 3, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography , Gallstone

Clinical Trials on nonradiation-to-endoscopist endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Subscribe