- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02704663
Transumbilical Versus Lateral Transabdominal Removal of Benign Adnexal Masses Via Laparoscopy
March 9, 2016 updated by: Päivi Päkarinen, Helsinki University Central Hospital
Transumbilical Versus Lateral Transabdominal Removal of Benign Adnexal Masses Via Laparoscopy, a Randomized Trial
In cases of benign adnexal mass laparoscopic surgery, women were randomized to two groups: transumbilical vs. transabdominal removal.
Need for pain medication, postoperative pain and patients´ satisfaction were assessed between the groups, as well as surgeons´ opinions and costs.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Detailed Description
Women assigned to laparoscopic surgery for removal of a benign adnexal mass were randomly divided into two groups as regards surgery: a transumbilical (TU) group (n=21) and a transabdominal (TA) group (n=21).
General anesthesia and use of local anesthetics were standardized.
Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and side effects (nausea/vomiting) and the amount of postoperative analgesic used were recorded for 24 hours.
Investigators also investigated the expenses related to endobags and trocars.
Further, peri- and postoperative complications were recorded.
Investigators inquired about patient satisfaction as well as the surgeons' opinions of the alternative methods available.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
42
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Helsinki, Finland, 00029
- Kätilöopisto Maternity Hospital, Helsinki University hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
20 years to 60 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The criteria for inclusion were scheduled laparoscopy for oophorectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy or cyst enucleation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The exclusion criteria were contraindications to any of the forms of medication used in the study (oxycodone, ketoprofen, paracetamol),
- language difficulties (inability to understand and speak Finnish or Swedish)
- and suspicion of malignancy.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Transumbilical route
Transumbilical removal of benign adnexal masses via laparoscopy.
|
Transumbilical removal of a benign adnexal mass from the abdominal cavity in laparoscopy
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Lateral abdominal route
Lateral transabdominal removal of benign adnexal masses via laparoscopy.
|
Lateral transabdominal removal of a benign adnexal mass from the abdominal cavity in laparoscopy
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The use of analgesics for postoperative pain
Time Frame: Change in 24 hours after surgery
|
The total amount of analgesics used measured by use of Oxycodone (mg)
|
Change in 24 hours after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Complications
Time Frame: The first six months after the surgical intervention
|
Frequency of complications.
Values are given as n (%) and eventual complications are specified
|
The first six months after the surgical intervention
|
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Change in 24 hours after surgery
|
Nausea after the procedure: Visual Analog Score (VAS) for nausea, to measure quality of nausea.
10-point VAS score for nausea [(0-10), 0 indicating no nausea and 10 indicating unbearable nausea.
at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h (hour) after surgery.
(Units on a Scale; 0-10)
|
Change in 24 hours after surgery
|
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Change in 24 hours after surgery
|
Vomiting after the procedure: Visual Analog Score (VAS) for vomiting to measure quality of vomiting.
10-point VAS score for vomiting [(0-10), 0 indicating no vomiting and 10 indicating unbearable vomiting] at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h (hour) after surgery.
(Units on a Scale; 0-10)
|
Change in 24 hours after surgery
|
|
Length of hospital stay in hours
Time Frame: Up to one week
|
Length of hospital stay measured from the end of the operation until discharge (hours)
|
Up to one week
|
|
Quality of life
Time Frame: At baseline and 6 months after the surgery
|
A questionnaire six months after operation concerning wellbeing outcome after six months (% of respondents in the group)
|
At baseline and 6 months after the surgery
|
|
Cosmetic outcome
Time Frame: At baseline and 6 months after the surgery
|
A questionnaire six months after operation concerning cosmetic outcome after six months (% of respondents in the group)
|
At baseline and 6 months after the surgery
|
|
Costs
Time Frame: During the surgery
|
Calculating the comparative direct costs of both techniques.
The cost of equipment used in the surgical intervention.
(euros)
|
During the surgery
|
|
Surgeon perception of both techniques
Time Frame: After one month after the operation
|
A questionnaire one month after operation of opinion of surgeons on preferred route of specimen removal (% of respondents in the group)
|
After one month after the operation
|
|
Length of need of postoperative pain medication
Time Frame: Change in one month after surgery
|
A questionnaire of pain medication needed postoperatively.
(Days)
|
Change in one month after surgery
|
|
Postoperative pain scores
Time Frame: Change in 24 hours after surgery
|
Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain to measure quality of pain.
10-point VAS score for pain [(0-10), 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating unbearable pain] at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h (hour) after surgery (Units on a Scale; 0-10)
|
Change in 24 hours after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Päivi I Pakarinen, MD PhD, Helsinki University Central Hospital
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Jokela R, Ahonen J, Tallgren M, Haanpaa M, Korttila K. A randomized controlled trial of perioperative administration of pregabalin for pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Pain. 2008 Jan;134(1-2):106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 May 15.
- Nilsson L, Wodlin NB, Kjolhede P. Risk factors for postoperative complications after fast-track abdominal hysterectomy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Apr;52(2):113-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01395.x. Epub 2012 Jan 8.
- Jokela R, Ahonen J, Tallgren M, Haanpaa M, Korttila K. Premedication with pregabalin 75 or 150 mg with ibuprofen to control pain after day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jun;100(6):834-40. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen098. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
- Wodlin NB, Nilsson L. The development of fast-track principles in gynecological surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Jan;92(1):17-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01525.x. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
- Wodlin NB, Nilsson L, Kjolhede P. Health-related quality of life and postoperative recovery in fast-track hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Apr;90(4):362-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01058.x. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
- Alessandri F, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, Nicoletti A, Ragni N. Effect of presurgical local infiltration of levobupivacaine in the surgical field on postsurgical wound pain in laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(7):844-9. doi: 10.1080/00016340500494846.
- Chou LY, Sheu BC, Chang DY, Huang SC, Chen SY, Hsu WC, Chang WC. Comparison between transumbilical and transabdominal ports for the laparoscopic retrieval of benign adnexal masses: a randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Dec;153(2):198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.029. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
- Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Siesto G, Bergamini V, Bolis P. Transumbilical surgical specimen retrieval: a viable refinement of laparoscopic surgery for pelvic masses. BJOG. 2008 Sep;115(10):1316-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01802.x.
- Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Bogani G, Serati M, Bolis P. Transumbilical versus transvaginal retrieval of surgical specimens at laparoscopy: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;207(2):112.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.016. Epub 2012 May 23.
- Akdemir A, Ergenoglu AM, Akman L, Yeniel AO, Sendag F, Oztekin MK. A novel technique for laparoscopic removal of the fallopian tube after ectopic pregnancy via transabdominal or transumbilical port using homemade bag: A randomized trial. J Res Med Sci. 2013 Sep;18(9):777-81.
- Kadar N, Reich H, Liu CY, Manko GF, Gimpelson R. Incisional hernias after major laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 May;168(5):1493-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90787-x.
- Karthik S, Augustine AJ, Shibumon MM, Pai MV. Analysis of laparoscopic port site complications: A descriptive study. J Minim Access Surg. 2013 Apr;9(2):59-64. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.110964.
- Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimbos-Kemper T, Hermans J, Trimbos JB. Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 May;104(5):595-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11539.x.
- Marks JL, Ata B, Tulandi T. Systematic review and metaanalysis of intraperitoneal instillation of local anesthetics for reduction of pain after gynecologic laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):545-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
- Yamamoto M, Minikel L, Zaritsky E. Laparoscopic 5-mm trocar site herniation and literature review. JSLS. 2011 Jan-Mar;15(1):122-6. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13022985131697.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
May 1, 2016
Study Completion (Anticipated)
May 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 9, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
March 10, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
March 10, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 9, 2016
Last Verified
March 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 98/13/03/03/2014
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | Postoperative Pain After Thoracic SurgeryGreece
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain Management | Postoperative Pain in Orthopaedics
-
Dr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicSpain
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompleted
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompletedAcute Postoperative Pain | Chronic Postoperative PainTurkey
-
Children's National Research InstituteVentureWellRecruitingPostoperative Pain | Acute Pain | Acute Pain, PostoperativeUnited States
-
University of ManitobaUnknown
-
University of MalayaActive, not recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain ManagementMalaysia
-
Maimonides Medical CenterCompletedPOSTOPERATIVE PAINUnited States
Clinical Trials on Transumbilical removal of specimen via laparoscopy
-
University of HelsinkiUniversity of Turku; Tampere University; University of Eastern Finland; University...Completed
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruitingAntibody Mediated Rejection After Kidney TransplantationFrance
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterAmbu A/SRecruitingLimit Emergence Phenomena After General AnesthesiaUnited States
-
Boehringer IngelheimCompleted
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)SuspendedCurrently Only Enrolling Glioblastoma Patients at First RecurrenceUnited States
-
Medical University of ViennaWithdrawnAnesthesia Intubation ComplicationAustria
-
University of British ColumbiaMakerere UniversityCompleted
-
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research GroupNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingGastric Adenocarcinoma | Peritoneal Carcinomatosis | Gastroesophageal Junction AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingLocally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Unresectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer American Joint Committee on Cancer v8United States
-
Arjun MittraNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingMetastatic Colorectal Carcinoma | Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the PeritoneumUnited States