Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

March 13, 2024 updated by: The Cooper Health System
This study is evaluating treatment with CyberKnife for soft tissue sarcomas.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Because of these possible advantages of SBRT over conventional radiation, the investigators began a small pilot study to test this new treatment technique in the setting of resectable soft tissue sarcomas. The pilot study was planned for a total of 12 patients which was felt to be a good number to gauge if further expansion of this technology would be successful. As of 2/6/2015 13 participants have enrolled (two enrolled patients declined treatment on protocol and thus a total of 11 patients have been treated on protocol). As of this time, the investigators have not had seen Grade 3 or higher toxicity and no instance of local failure. There have been several distant failures which would not be related to local therapy like SBRT and if anything, SBRT should reduce instance of distant failure by shortening time to chemotherapy.

The following represents the initial experience for SBRT for STS (from manuscript submitted for publication). Note that on the below abstract 8 participants were treated on the pilot study while 5 participants were treated prior to pilot study opening (the one instance of local failure is from patient treated pre-protocol).

In terms of patient numbers the goal is to have 33 patients in cohorts one and two. Using historical controls of late toxicity rates of 40% and late toxicity rates in the initial population of 20% with an alpha of 0.1 (which is reasonable for phase II studies, an alpha of 0.05 is typical for phase III studies) there would be 80% power to detect a difference with 33 patients.

The expectation for this phase II study includes the following

  1. Late toxicity 30% or less
  2. Local control rates 90% or better

These numbers are based on historical controls and previous research. Local control rates for historical series have been 90% or better and this also held true in the initial phase II study. For late toxicity rates, historical controls are 35-43% (The NCI study that used similar wound complication definitions to us and was a well powered study had a wound complication rate of 43%). The investigators feel that for this study to be promising enough for large phase III non-inferiority studies that the current phase II study should have late toxicity rates of 30% or better and local control rates of 90% or better.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Kimberly Krieger
  • Phone Number: 856-735-6237

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Camden, New Jersey, United States, 08103
        • MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All cohorts:
  • Age > 18
  • Patients of child-bearing age must agree to contraception until radiosurgery has been completed.
  • Note that patients with metastatic disease are eligible for protocol
  • Cohort 1: Soft tissue sarcoma (of any histology subtype) in patients that are -planned to have pre-operative radiation followed by surgical resection
  • Anatomical site to include upper extremity (including shoulder) and lower extremity (including hip)
  • Patient performance status and co-morbid conditions to allow for surgical resection
  • Cohort 2: soft tissue sarcoma (of any histologic subtype) post-resection with no further plans for additional surgery.
  • Patients must have high risk feature requiring post-operative radiation which can include Large tumor (> 5 cm), High grade, Previous unplanned, non, oncologic surgery, Close margins
  • Anatomical site to include upper extremity (including shoulder) and lower extremity (including hip)
  • Cohort 3: soft tissue sarcoma (of any histologic subtype) that is not amenable to surgical resection for any reason
  • Anatomical site to include upper extremity (including shoulder) and lower extremity (including hip and pelvis)
  • Patients cannot have planned surgical resection
  • Note that retroperitoneal sarcomas are not eligible

Exclusion Criteria:

-Tumors that do not fit criteria for any of the above cohorts

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: A: pre-operative

Radiation- CyberKnife:

35-40 Gy over 5 fractions

Surgery:

Surgical resection of sarcoma

Other Names:
  • CK
Experimental: B: Post-operative

Radiation- CyberKnife:

40 Gy over 5 fractions

Other Names:
  • CK
Experimental: C: Non-resectable

Radiation- CyberKnife:

50 Gy over 5 fractions

Other Names:
  • CK

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: 1-2 months
1-2 months
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
change in tumor burden by RECIST 1.1 response assessment
Time Frame: 1-2 months, 4 months
1-2 months, 4 months
overall survival
Time Frame: 6 months, 1 year, 5 years
6 months, 1 year, 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

March 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15-073

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Clinical Trials on CyberKnife

3
Subscribe