A French Protocol for the Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in Children and Adolescents (CAALL-F01)

February 18, 2019 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

A still major question in the field of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children - an extremely heterogeneous disease though curable in 80-90% of children and 70-80% of the adolescents - is the optimal use of L-asparaginase (ASNase). It is known that administering ASNase results in the depletion of asparagine circulating in the blood, which starves the leukemic cells and results in their death. But indeed the use of ASNase varies between protocols considering the different brands, the dose and the administration modalities. Oncaspar (PEGylated E. coli asparaginase, pegaspargase) was thus developed with the goal of reducing the immunogenicity of the native ASNase.

This is a French prospective multicentric cohort study of children and adolescents with ALL, stratified on (i) the type of ALL ( B vs T) and (ii) the anticipated risk (stratified in 3 groups for childhood B-cell precursor (BCP)-ALL and 2 groups for T-cell ALL).

It aims to answer to two different issues:

  1. Randomized question: what is the best way to administer pegaspargase? A cohort of children and adolescents with standard or medium risk ALL will be randomized to receive during induction either one infusion of ONCASPAR® 2500 IU/m2 at D12 or two infusions of ONCASPAR® at 1250 IU/m2 each at D12 and D26. Patients will then receive 2500 IU/m2 or 1250 IU/m2 per dose during consolidation and delayed intensification according to the initial arm of randomization.
  2. Non randomized question: In the High/Very High Risk groups, a non randomized intensification of the scheme of asparaginase administration is proposed during induction therapy: 2 infusions of 2500 IU/m2/day (D12 and D26) will be administered. All patients will receive 2500 IU/m2 per dose during consolidation and delayed intensifications.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1578

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France, 80054
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Catherine Devoldere, MD
      • Angers, France, 49033
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
      • Besançon, France, 25030
        • Recruiting
        • CHRU
        • Contact:
          • Pauline Simon, MD
      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Yves Perel, MD
      • Brest, France, 29609
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Liana Carausu, MD
      • Caen, France, 14033
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Odile Minckes, MD
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Justyna Kanold, MD
      • Dijon, France, 21079
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Elodie Colomb, MD
      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Françoise Mazingue, MD
      • Limoges, France, 87042
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
      • Lyon, France, 69373
      • Marseille, France, 13385
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Gérard Michel, MD
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Nicolas Sirvent, MD
      • Nancy, France, 54511
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Claudine Schmitt, MD
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Caroline Thomas, MD
      • Nice, France, 06200
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Pierre-Simon Rohrlich, MD
      • Paris, France, 75019
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Saint Louis
        • Contact:
          • Nicolas Boissel, MD
      • Paris, France, 75012
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Armand Trousseau
        • Contact:
          • Arnaud Petit, MD
      • Poitiers, France, 86000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Frédéric Millot, MD
      • Reims, France, 51100
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Stéphanie Gordes-Grosjean, MD
      • Rennes, France, 35203
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Virginie Gandemer, MD
      • Rouen, France, 76031
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Pascale Schneider, MD
      • Saint Etienne, France, 42270
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Sandrine Thouvenin-Doulet, MD
      • Strasbourg, France, 67098
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Patrick Lutz, MD
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Geneviève Plat, MD
      • Tours, France, 37044
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Pascale Blouin, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 months to 16 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ALL L1 or L2
  • B-lineage or T- lineage ALL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • L3 (Burkitt's leukemia)
  • Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia (WHO criteria).
  • Infant ALL (age ≤ 365 days)
  • Philadelphia (Ph)+/Breakpoint Cluster region (BCR)-Abelson (ABL) ALL

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm 1
pegaspargase 2500 IU/m2 x 1: infusion of a conventional dose of pegaspargase during induction therapy: 2500 IU/m2x1
only for ALL of standard risk and medium risk
Other Names:
  • ONCASPAR 2500 IU/m2 x 1
Experimental: Arm 2
pegaspargase 1250 IU/m2 x 2: fractionation of the 2500 IU/m2 pegaspargase dose in two infusions of 1250 IU/m2 each
only for ALL of standard risk and medium risk
Other Names:
  • ONCASPAR 1250 IU/m2 x 2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of adequate (> 100 IU/L) asparaginase activity measured in the plasma at day 33 of induction therapy
Time Frame: Day 33
asparaginase activity > 100 IU/L
Day 33
Incidence of directly asparaginase-related severe toxicities (Grade ≥ 3 as assessed by CTCAE v4.0) observed during induction therapy
Time Frame: Between Day 12 of induction and Day 8 of consolidation
Incidence of severe toxicities (Grade ≥ 3) directly asparaginase-related (CNS thrombosis, pancreatitis, anaphylaxis, and hyperbilirubinemia) between Day 12 and Day 49 of treatment and anyway before Day 8 of consolidation
Between Day 12 of induction and Day 8 of consolidation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of asparagine depletion measured in plasma by a concentration below the Limit of Quantification (LOQ) of 0.4 micromol/L
Time Frame: Day 33 of induction
Day 33 of induction
Incidence of adequate (> 100 IU/L) asparaginase activity measured in the plasma at day 40 of induction therapy
Time Frame: Day 40 of induction
Day 40 of induction
Incidence of asparagine depletion measured in plasma by a concentration below the Limit of Quantification (LOQ) of 0.4 micromol/L
Time Frame: Day 40 of induction
Day 40 of induction
Incidence of antibodies against asparaginase, measured in serum
Time Frame: Day 4 of delayed intensification
Day 4 of delayed intensification
Incidence of silent inactivation
Time Frame: First 6-9 months
Silent inactivation or subclinical hypersensitivity is defined as a plasma PEGasparaginase activity level <100 IU/L at day 7+/- 1 or <20 IU/L at day 14 +/- 11 after administration in a patient without clinical symptoms of allergy
First 6-9 months
Percentage of patients without switch to Erwinia asparaginase
Time Frame: First 6-9 months
First 6-9 months
Percentage of patients receiving more than 95% of the intended dose of asparaginase
Time Frame: First 6-9 months
First 6-9 months
Morphological Complete Remission (CR) rates
Time Frame: Day 35-Day 42
Assessed on the whole population or on subgroups (B-Lineage ALL, T-cell ALL).
Day 35-Day 42
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
Time Frame: Day 35-Day 42, Day 65-Day 105

MRD will be assessed by Ig/T cell receptor (TCR)-based real-time quantitative (RQ)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR), assessed on the whole population or on subgroups (B-Lineage ALL, T-cell ALL).

Assessed on the whole population or on subgroups (B-Lineage ALL, T-cell ALL).

Day 35-Day 42, Day 65-Day 105
Cumulative Incidence of relapses
Time Frame: 5 years
Assessed on the whole population or on subgroups (B-Lineage ALL, T-cell ALL).
5 years
Cumulative Incidence of relapse according to site of relapse
Time Frame: 5 years

Bone-Marrow (BM) relapses, central nervous system (CNS) relapses, gonadal relapses, combined relapses.

Assessed on the whole population or on subgroups (B-Lineage ALL, T-cell ALL).

5 years
All other adverse events related to asparaginase
Time Frame: within the first 7 weeks (Day 49) of treatment and anyway before Day 8 of consolidation
Drug-induced hyperglycemia or diabetes, coagulopathy, allergy Non CNS thrombosis Grade 1-2 Adverse Events (AE): pancreatitis, hyperbilirubinemia
within the first 7 weeks (Day 49) of treatment and anyway before Day 8 of consolidation
Late adverse events related to asparaginase
Time Frame: after Day 49 of induction or anyway at Day 8 of consolidation or after
after Day 49 of induction or anyway at Day 8 of consolidation or after

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Clinical Trials on pegaspargase 2500 IU/m2 x 1

3
Subscribe