Intubation During Spinal Immobilization

July 25, 2017 updated by: Łukasz Szarpak, Medical University of Warsaw

C-MAC Compared to Direct Laryngoscopy in Patients With Immobilized Cervical Spine by Unexperienced Physicians: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Trial

The aim was to evaluate the performance of the C-MAC compared with Macintosh when performed in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Masovia
      • Warsaw, Masovia, Poland, 02-005
        • Medical University of Warsaw, Department of Emergency Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • limited experience (<5 intubations) with "real-life" intubation using direct laryngoscopy
  • novice phhysicians

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not meet the above criteria
  • practice with any videolaryngoscopy
  • wrist or low back diseases
  • pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Scenario A
manikin with normal standard airway
1) Direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh laryngoscope with size 3 blade (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL, USA) with a conventional 7.0 mm internal diameter (ID) tracheal tube
C-MAC introduced with a h size 3 blade.
Experimental: Scenario B
Cervical immobilization using a standard Patriot cervical extraction collar (Oessur Americas, Foothill Ranch, CA, USA), applied to the manikin's neck by an instructor.
1) Direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh laryngoscope with size 3 blade (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL, USA) with a conventional 7.0 mm internal diameter (ID) tracheal tube
C-MAC introduced with a h size 3 blade.
Experimental: Scenario C
Cervical immobilization using a vacuum mattress (Ferno-Washington, Inc. Wilmington, OH, USA), applied to the manikin's neck by an instructor
1) Direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh laryngoscope with size 3 blade (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL, USA) with a conventional 7.0 mm internal diameter (ID) tracheal tube
C-MAC introduced with a h size 3 blade.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time required for successful intubation
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ease of intubation
Time Frame: 1 day
To access subjective opinion about the difficulty of each intubation method, participants were asked to rate it on a visual analog scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult).
1 day
Cormack&Lehane grade
Time Frame: 1 day
glottic view during intubation rate using Cormack&Lehane grade
1 day
Dental Compression
Time Frame: 1 day
the severity of the potential dental trauma was calculated based on previously described modified grading scale (Svoldelli, 2009)
1 day
success rate of intubation attempt
Time Frame: 1 day
success rate of first intubation attempt
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Łukasz Szarpak, PhD, Medical University of Warsaw

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 23.01.2017.IRB

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endotracheal Intubation

Clinical Trials on Standard endotracheal tube

Subscribe