High Dose Intravenous Ascorbic Acid in Severe Sepsis

January 28, 2021 updated by: Christiana Care Health Services

The Efficacy of Intravenous Ascorbic Acid in Patients With Severe Sepsis

Despite an organized treatment approach outlined in expert-consensus guidelines for sepsis with fluid resuscitation to treat hypovolemia, antibiotics to target the infectious insult, and vasopressors for hypotension, mortality rates for sepsis remain high and the incidence continues to rise, making sepsis the most expensive inpatient disease.

  1. Recent research has described the therapeutic benefits associated with ascorbic acid treatment for sepsis.
  2. Researchers objectives are to perform a randomized-controlled clinical trial investigating the ability of ascorbic acid(vitamin C) administration to decrease organ dysfunction in severe sepsis. The widespread occurrence of microvascular dysfunction in sepsis leading to tissue hypoxia, mitochondrial dysfunction, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) depletion, gives rise to organ failure.
  3. Patients with organ failure and sepsis (severe sepsis) are at a higher risk of death than patients with organ failure alone. Critically ill patients may have an increased requirement for ascorbic acid in sepsis and these patients frequently have levels below normal. Ascorbic acid administration, has been shown to correlate inversely with organ failure (human literature) and directly with survival (animal studies).

4,5 Intravenous ascorbic acid therapy decreases organ failure by providing a protective effect on several microvascular functions including improving capillary blood flow, decreasing microvascular permeability, and improving arteriolar responsiveness to vasoconstrictors. Defining the utility of novel agents to augment researchers care for severe sepsis is an important task as investigators continue the institutional focus on sepsis care.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Delaware
      • Newark, Delaware, United States, 19718
        • Chrisitana Care Health System-Christiana Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with:

  1. A suspected or confirmed infection with an order for intravenous antibiotics or antivirals
  2. The presence of acute sepsis-induced organ dysfunction

Definition of organ dysfunction:

  1. Arterial hypoxemia [PaO2 /FiO2 < 300]
  2. Hypotension [systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg or SBP decrease > 40 mmHg]
  3. Lactic acidosis [lactate > 2.5 mmol/L]
  4. Acute kidney injury [creatinine >2.0 or urine output < 0.5 ml/kg/hr for >2 hours despite fluid resuscitation]
  5. Thrombocytopenia [platelet count < 100,000]
  6. Acute coagulopathy [international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5]
  7. Hepatic failure [bilirubin > 2 mg/dL].
  8. Predisposition, Infection, Response, and Organ Failure (PIRO) score ≥ 10

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age < 18 years
  2. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  3. Requirement for immediate surgery within the treatment protocol timeframe
  4. Inability to obtain written informed consent from subject or surrogate
  5. Patient to receive comfort measures only

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: High dose IV ascorbic acid
Patients will receive 67 mg/kg IV ascorbic acid in 100 ml normal saline over 30 minutes every 8 hours (200 mg/kg/day) for 72 hours.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
The placebo group will receive 100 ml 0.9% NaCl over 30 minutes every 8 hours for 72 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Modified SOFA Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 72 hours
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score included the degree of dysfunction of six organ systems (Respiratory, Cardiovascular, Liver, Renal, Coagulation, Neurologic. A modification of the SOFA includes the exclusion of the Liver function. Total score is reported, minimum score = 0 maximum score = 20. Higher scores indicate greater degree of dysfunction.
Baseline and 72 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified SOFA Score
Time Frame: at 72 Hours
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score included the degree of dysfunction of six organ systems (Respiratory, Cardiovascular, Liver, Renal, Coagulation, Neurologic. A modification of the SOFA includes the exclusion of the Liver function. Total score is reported, minimum score = 0 maximum score = 20. Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction.
at 72 Hours
Ascorbic Acid Concentration at 32 Hours
Time Frame: 32 Hours
Ascorbic Acid Concentration Normal Ascorbic Acid Range 0.4-2.0 mg/dL
32 Hours
ICU Length of Stay
Time Frame: Length of ICU stay up to 200 hours
ICU Length of Stay in Hours
Length of ICU stay up to 200 hours
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: From ICU admission through ICU discharge, up to 2 weeks
From admission until discharge from ICU in days
From ICU admission through ICU discharge, up to 2 weeks
Change in PIRO Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 72 hours
PIRO consists of 4 assessments, Predisposition (scored 0-9), Infection (scored 0-4), Response (scored 0-6), and Organ Failure (scored 0-14) (PIRO). The total PIRO score is the sum of all subscores and ranges from 0-33 with higher scores indicating worse health.
Baseline and 72 hours
Percentage of Participants Who Died
Time Frame: From initial hospital admission through discharge, up to 2 weeks.
From initial hospital admission through discharge, up to 2 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jamie Rosini, PharmD, Christiana Care Health Services

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 8, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 23, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Normal Saline

Subscribe